Umbilical hernia repair with mesh: identifying effectors of ideal outcomes

被引:15
作者
Colavita, Paul D. [1 ]
Belyansky, Igor [1 ]
Walters, Amanda L. [1 ]
Zemlyak, Alla Y. [1 ]
Lincourt, Amy E. [1 ]
Heniford, B. Todd [1 ]
Augenstein, Vedra A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Carolinas Med Ctr, Div Gastrointestinal & Minimally Invas Surg, Carolinas Laparoscop & Adv Surg Program, Charlotte, NC 28203 USA
关键词
Umbilical hernia; Quality of life; Carolinas Comfort Score; Laparoscopic umbilical hernia repair; Open umbilical hernia repair; Mesh; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL; INCISIONAL HERNIA; INGUINAL-HERNIA; LIGHTWEIGHT; PAIN; SUTURE; IMPACT; TEP;
D O I
10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.12.031
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: Quality of life has become an important focus for improvement in hernia repair. METHODS: The International Hernia Mesh Registry was queried. The Carolinas Comfort Scale quantitated quality of life at 1-month, 6-month, and annual follow-up. Scores of 0 (completely asymptomatic) in all categories without recurrence defined an ideal outcome. RESULTS: The analysis consisted of 363 umbilical hernia repairs; 18.7% were laparoscopic. Demographics included age of 51.5 +/- 13.8 years, 24.5% were female, and the average body mass index was 30.63 +/- 5.9 kg/m(2). Mean defect size was 4.3 +/- 3.1 cm(2). Mean follow-up was 18.2 months. Absent/minimal preoperative symptoms were predictive of ideal outcome at all time points and increasing age was predictive at 6 months and 1 year. At 6 months, the use of fixation sutures alone versus tacks (odds ratio 14.1) predicted ideal outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Ideal outcomes are dependent on both patient-specific and operative factors. The durable, ideal outcome in umbilical hernia repair is most likely in an older, asymptomatic patient who undergoes mesh fixation with permanent suture. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:342 / 349
页数:8
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   Randomized clinical trial comparing suture and mesh repair of umbilical hernia in adults [J].
Arroyo, A ;
García, P ;
Pérez, F ;
Andreu, J ;
Candela, F ;
Calpena, R .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2001, 88 (10) :1321-1323
[2]   Does mesh offer an advantage over tissue in the open repair of umbilical hernias? A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Aslani, N. ;
Brown, C. J. .
HERNIA, 2010, 14 (05) :455-462
[3]   Prospective, Comparative Study of Postoperative Quality of Life in TEP, TAPP, and Modified Lichtenstein Repairs [J].
Belyansky, Igor ;
Tsirline, Victor B. ;
Klima, David A. ;
Walters, Amanda L. ;
Lincourt, Amy E. ;
Heniford, Todd B. .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2011, 254 (05) :709-715
[4]   Open intraperitoneal versus retromuscular mesh repair for umbilical hernias less than 3cm diameter [J].
Berrevoet, Frederik ;
D'Hont, Frederik ;
Rogiers, Xavier ;
Troisi, Roberto ;
de Hemptinne, Bernard .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2011, 201 (01) :85-90
[5]  
Black N, 1991, Int J Technol Assess Health Care, V7, P533
[6]   Three-year results of a randomized clinical trial of lightweight or standard polypropylene mesh in Lichtenstein repair of primary inguinal hernia [J].
Bringman, S. ;
Wollert, S. ;
Osterberg, J. ;
Smedberg, S. ;
Granlund, H. ;
Heikkinen, T. -J. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2006, 93 (09) :1056-1059
[7]   Early results of a randomized multicenter trial comparing Prolene and VyproII mesh in bilateral endoscopic extraperitoneal hernioplast (TEP) [J].
Bringman, S ;
Wollert, S ;
Osterberg, J ;
Heikkinen, T .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2005, 19 (04) :536-540
[8]  
Carbonell AM, 2003, AM SURGEON, V69, P688
[9]   Inguinal hernia repair: The choice of prosthesis outweighs that of technique [J].
Champault G. ;
Bernard C. ;
Rizk N. ;
Polliand C. .
Hernia, 2007, 11 (2) :125-128
[10]  
Cobb William S, 2005, Surg Innov, V12, P63, DOI 10.1177/155335060501200109