Critical assessment of geochronological data from the Carajas Mineral Province, Brazil: Implications for metallogeny and tectonic evolution

被引:19
|
作者
Trunfull, Eliza F. [1 ]
Hagemann, Steffen G. [1 ]
Xavier, Roberto P. [2 ]
Moreto, Carolina P. N. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Australia, Ctr Explorat Targeting, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
[2] Univ Estadual Campinas, Inst Geosci, BR-13083870 Campinas, SP, Brazil
关键词
Carajas Mineral Province; Fe-oxide Cu-Au deposits; Geochronology; Sossego; Igarape Bahia; Salobo; OXIDE-COPPER-GOLD; U-PB GEOCHRONOLOGY; A-TYPE GRANITES; PD-PT DEPOSIT; SOUTHEASTERN AMAZONIAN CRATON; FLUID-INDUCED NUCLEATION; SERRA-DOS-CARAJAS; GRAO-PARA GROUP; CU-AU; HYDROTHERMAL ALTERATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.oregeorev.2020.103556
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
The Carajas Domain in the Amazonian Craton, Brazil, displays remarkable metallogenetic diversity, containing iron-oxide-copper-gold (IOCG), Cu-Au, Mn, Fe, Ni-Co, PGE-Cr and Au-PGE mineral systems. It consists of Mesoarchean (2.83-3.08 Ga) basement granitoids and gneisses overlain by the ca. 2.73-2.76 Ga rift related meta-volcanosedimentary units of the Neoarchean Carajas Basin. Coeval ca. 2.76 mafic-ultramafic complexes host nickel-cobalt laterite (Vermelho, Puma-Onca) and magmatic PGE-Cr (Luanga) deposits. Unconformably overlying this is the aguas Claras Formation, a package of fluvial to shallow marine sedimentary rocks of controversial but probable Archean age, based on 2.6-2.7 Ga cross cutting mafic dikes. This hosts manganese deposits (Azul), small polymetallic Cu-Au deposits (Breves) and the Serra Pelada Au-Pt-Pd deposit. IOCG deposits are located along WNW regional shear zones hosted within the Itacaiunas Supergroup, Mesoarchean basement, and bimodal 2.76-2.73 Ga Neoarchean granitoids and gabbro. Geochronology supports the existence of multiple, superimposed and episodic hydrothermal and mineral systems. Multiple mineralization ages are common within single deposits and establishing the age of primary mineralization, as opposed to overprinting hydrothermal events, is challenging. Copper mineralization formed as early as ca. 2.76 Ga, coeval with basin formation, while structurally controlled IOCG deposits formed, or were substantially modified, during multiple hydrothermal episodes: ca. 2.72-2.68 Ga, 2.6-2.45 Ga and 1.88 Ga. For the northern IOCG deposits (e.g. Salobo and Igarape Bahia/AlemAo), a temporal overlap between 2.57 Ga mineralization and the 2.57 Ga alkaline Old Salobo Granite is commonly used to infer a genetic link. Yet this geochronology's reliability is debatable; younger ages exist for the Old Salobo Granite (2.55-2.53 Ga), zircons are metamict, and older mineralization ages have been reported, suggesting a more complex history. The occurrence of ages ca. 2.60-2.45 Ga is spatially restricted to the north and coincides with an important, yet poorly understood, tectono-thermal event involving reactivation of the northern Cinzento Shear Zone and amphibolite facies metamorphism. Whether IOCG deposits formed during this tectonic event or represent substantially modified or metamorphosed older mineralization (or both), is contentious. Older mineralization ca. 2.71 Ga at the Igarape Cinzento IOCG deposit in the north is coeval with the southern IOCG deposits, formed ca. 2.72-2.68 Ga (Sequeirinho, Bacaba and Bacuri). This does not convincingly overlap with the intrusion of widespread 2.76-2.73 Ga "syntectonic" granitoids so a genetic link with magmatic fluids is speculative and basinal brines may play a role. Due to controversy regarding the timing of compression and basin closure, the tectonic setting is debated; mineralization either formed during rifting or synchronous with basin inversion, but the latter is more supported by geochronology and ore textures. In the south, Paleoproterozoic ca. 1.88 Ga IOCGs (the Sossego-Curral orebodies of the Sossego deposit and Alvo 118), or alternatively overprinting Cu-Au systems, formed coeval with craton wide, A-type, 1.88 Ga granite magmatism. This magmatic-hydrothermal system is responsible for a large part of the metallogenetic diversity of Carajas Domain. Small (generally < 50Mt) Cu-Au deposits (e.g. Breves and Estrela) formed 1.88 Ga and show close spatial relationships to 1.88 Ga granites and alteration styles consistent with granitic influence (e.g. greisenization, enrichment in granitophile elements Bi-W-Sn). These granites are locally Sn-W mineralized in the Rio Maria Domain (e.g. Velho Guilherme Intrusive Suite). The enigmatic Serra Pelada hydrothermal Au-Pt-Pd deposit also formed ca.1.88 Ga and magmatic fluids have been implicated in the hypogene enrichment of the giant Serra Norte iron ore deposits.
引用
收藏
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Tectonic Evolution of the Eastern Southern Alps (Italy): A Reappraisal From New Structural Data and Geochronological Constraints
    Curzi, Manuel
    Viola, Giulio
    Zuccari, Costantino
    Aldega, Luca
    Billi, Andrea
    van der Lelij, Roelant
    Kylander-Clark, Andrew
    Vignaroli, Gianluca
    TECTONICS, 2024, 43 (03) : 1 - 30
  • [32] Geochronological and geochemical data of paragneiss and amphibolite from the Chencai Group in South China: Implications for petrogenesis and tectonic significance
    Lu Kejia
    Li Longming
    Lin Shoufa
    Ren Shenglian
    Feng Lamei
    Han Xu
    Ge Yanpeng
    Jiang Jian
    Wang, Lei
    Wang Bo
    GEOLOGICAL JOURNAL, 2020, 55 (10) : 6823 - 6840
  • [33] A fluid inclusion and stable isotope (O, H, S and C) study of the Archean IOCG Cristalino deposit, Carajas mineral Province, Brazil: Implications to ore genesis
    Craveiro, Gustavo Souza
    Nobre Villas, Raimundo Netuno
    Xavier, Roberto Perez
    ORE GEOLOGY REVIEWS, 2020, 127
  • [34] Sources of mineralizing fluids in Cu-Au systems from the Carajas Mineral Province (Brazil): constraints from in-situ microanalysis of hydrogen and boron isotopes in tourmaline
    Xavier, Roberto Perez
    Trumbull, Robert B.
    Wiedenbeck, Michael
    Soares Monteiro, Lena Virginia
    MINERAL DEPOSIT RESEARCH FOR A HIGH-TECH WORLD, VOLS. 1-4, 2013, : 1402 - 1405
  • [35] Carboniferous-Triassic felsic igneous rocks and typical mineral deposits in the Truong Son orogenic belt, SE Asia: Implications for Paleo-Tethyan tectonic evolution and metallogeny
    Hou, Lin
    Xiong, Fuhao
    Wang, Wei
    Guo, Linnan
    Peng, Huijuan
    Ni, Shijun
    Zhang, Qiming
    ORE GEOLOGY REVIEWS, 2019, 112
  • [36] SHRIMP U-Pb zircon geochronology of granitoids from Dongping area, Hebei Province, China: constraints on tectonic evolution and geodynamic setting for gold metallogeny
    Miao, LC
    Qiu, YM
    McNaughton, N
    Luo, ZK
    Groves, D
    Zhai, YS
    Fan, WM
    Zhai, MG
    Guan, K
    ORE GEOLOGY REVIEWS, 2002, 19 (3-4) : 187 - 204
  • [37] Mapping iron oxides with Landsat-8/OLI and EO-1/Hyperion imagery from the Serra Norte iron deposits in the Carajas Mineral Province, Brazil
    Ducart, Diego Fernando
    Silva, Adalene Moreira
    Bemfica Toledo, Catarina Laboure
    de Assis, Luciano Mozer
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF GEOLOGY, 2016, 46 (03) : 331 - 349
  • [38] Tectonic Evolution of Southeast Central Asian Orogenic Belt: Evidence from Geochronological Data and Paleontology of the Early Paleozoic Deposits in Inner Mongolia
    Wang, Shijie
    Li, Shichao
    Li, Wenjie
    Xu, Zhongyuan
    Zhang, Jinfeng
    Li, Changhai
    Shi, Qiang
    Liu, Yang
    Wang, Wenlong
    Guan, Qingbin
    JOURNAL OF EARTH SCIENCE, 2020, 31 (04) : 743 - 756
  • [39] THE EFFECTS OF POST-CUMULUS ALTERATION ON THE DISTRIBUTION OF CHALCOPHILE ELEMENTS IN MAGMATIC SULFIDE DEPOSITS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR THE FORMATION OF LOW-S-HIGH-PGE ZONES: THE LUANGA DEPOSIT, CARAJAS MINERAL PROVINCE, BRAZIL
    Mansur, Eduardo
    Barnes, Sarah-Jane
    Ferreira Filho, Cesar F.
    CANADIAN MINERALOGIST, 2021, 59 (06) : 1453 - 1484
  • [40] TONALITE-TRONDHJEMITE AND LEUCOGRANODIORITE-GRANITE SUITES FROM THE RIO MARIA DOMAIN, CARAJAS PROVINCE, BRAZIL: IMPLICATIONS FOR DISCRIMINATION AND ORIGIN OF THE ARCHEAN Na-GRANITOIDS
    Costa de Almeida, Jose de Arimateia
    Dall'agnol, Roberto
    Rocha, Marcilio Cardoso
    CANADIAN MINERALOGIST, 2017, 55 (03) : 437 - 456