BRCA1 Promotes Unloading of the CMG Helicase from a Stalled DNA Replication Fork

被引:90
|
作者
Long, David T. [1 ]
Joukov, Vladimir [1 ]
Budzowska, Magda [1 ]
Walter, Johannes C. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Dept Biol Chem & Mol Pharmacol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Howard Hughes Med Inst, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
CROSS-LINK REPAIR; FANCONI-ANEMIA PATHWAY; XENOPUS EGG EXTRACTS; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; POLYMERASE-EPSILON; DAMAGE RESPONSE; CELL-CYCLE; MONOUBIQUITINATED FANCD2; TUMOR-SUPPRESSOR; MAMMALIAN-CELLS;
D O I
10.1016/j.molcel.2014.08.012
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The tumor suppressor protein BRCA1 promotes homologous recombination (HR), a high-fidelity mechanism to repair DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) that arise during normal replication and in response to DNA-damaging agents. Recent genetic experiments indicate that BRCA1 also performs an HR-independent function during the repair of DNA interstrand crosslinks (ICLs). Here we show that BRCA1 is required to unload the CMG helicase complex from chromatin after replication forks collide with an ICL. Eviction of the stalled helicase allows leading strands to be extended toward the ICL, followed by endonucleolytic processing of the crosslink, lesion bypass, and DSB repair. Our results identify BRCA1-dependent helicase unloading as a critical, early event in ICL repair.
引用
收藏
页码:174 / 185
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Stalled replication fork rescue requires a novel DNA helicase
    Bianco, Piero
    METHODS, 2016, 108 : 40 - 47
  • [2] The DNA replication fork suppresses CMG unloading from chromatin before termination
    Low, Emily
    Chistol, Gheorghe
    Zaher, Manal S.
    Kochenova, Olga, V
    Walter, Johannes C.
    GENES & DEVELOPMENT, 2020, 34 (21-22) : 1534 - 1545
  • [3] Isomerization of BRCA1–BARD1 promotes replication fork protection
    Manuel Daza-Martin
    Katarzyna Starowicz
    Mohammed Jamshad
    Stephanie Tye
    George E. Ronson
    Hannah L. MacKay
    Anoop Singh Chauhan
    Alexandra K. Walker
    Helen R. Stone
    James F. J. Beesley
    Jennifer L. Coles
    Alexander J. Garvin
    Grant S. Stewart
    Thomas J. McCorvie
    Xiaodong Zhang
    Ruth M. Densham
    Joanna R. Morris
    Nature, 2019, 571 : 521 - 527
  • [4] Synergism between CMG helicase and leading strand DNA polymerase at replication fork
    Zhichun Xu
    Jianrong Feng
    Daqi Yu
    Yunjing Huo
    Xiaohui Ma
    Wai Hei Lam
    Zheng Liu
    Xiang David Li
    Toyotaka Ishibashi
    Shangyu Dang
    Yuanliang Zhai
    Nature Communications, 14
  • [5] Synergism between CMG helicase and leading strand DNA polymerase at replication fork
    Xu, Zhichun
    Feng, Jianrong
    Yu, Daqi
    Huo, Yunjing
    Ma, Xiaohui
    Lam, Wai Hei
    Liu, Zheng
    Li, Xiang David
    Ishibashi, Toyotaka
    Dang, Shangyu
    Zhai, Yuanliang
    NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2023, 14 (01)
  • [6] SSB and the RecG DNA helicase: an intimate association to rescue a stalled replication fork
    Bianco, Piero R.
    Lyubchenko, Yuri L.
    PROTEIN SCIENCE, 2017, 26 (04) : 638 - 649
  • [7] Replication Fork Activation Is Enabled by a Single-Stranded DNA Gate in CMG Helicase
    Wasserman, Michael R.
    Schauer, Grant D.
    O'Donnell, Michael E.
    Liu, Shixin
    CELL, 2019, 178 (03) : 600 - +
  • [8] Replication Fork Activation is Enabled by a Single-Stranded DNA Gate in CMG Helicase
    Wasserman, Michael R.
    Schauer, Grant D.
    O'Donnell, Michael E.
    Liu, Shixin
    BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2020, 118 (03) : 375A - 375A
  • [9] CMG helicase disassembly is controlled by replication fork DNA, replisome components and a ubiquitin threshold
    Deegan, Tom D.
    Mukherjee, Progya P.
    Fujisawa, Ryo
    Rivera, Cristian Polo
    Labib, Karim
    ELIFE, 2020, 9
  • [10] Replication Fork Reversal during DNA Interstrand Crosslink Repair Requires CMG Unloading
    Amunugama, Ravindra
    Willcox, Smaranda
    Wu, R. Alex
    Abdullah, Ummi B.
    El-Sagheer, Afaf H.
    Brown, Tom
    McHugh, Peter J.
    Griffith, Jack D.
    Walter, Johannes C.
    CELL REPORTS, 2018, 23 (12): : 3419 - 3428