Antimicrobial Policies in United States Beef Production: Choosing the Right Instruments to Reduce Antimicrobial Use and Resistance Under Structural and Market Constraints

被引:12
作者
Lhermie, Guillaume [1 ]
Chiu, Leslie Verteramo [1 ]
Kaniyamattam, Karun [1 ]
Tauer, Loren William [2 ]
Scott, Harvey Morgan [3 ]
Grohn, Yrjo Tapio [1 ]
机构
[1] Cornell Univ, Coll Vet Med, Dept Populat Med & Diagnost Sci, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
[2] Cornell Univ, Cornell SC Johnson Coll Business, Dyson Sch Appl Econ & Management, Ithaca, NY USA
[3] Texas A&M Univ, Coll Vet Med & Biomed Sci, Dept Vet Pathobiol, College Stn, TX USA
来源
FRONTIERS IN VETERINARY SCIENCE | 2019年 / 6卷
基金
美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
policy analysis; antimicrobial use; antimicrobial resistance; beef production system; policy instruments; economics; DISEASE; MANAGEMENT; PROGRAMS; CALVES;
D O I
10.3389/fvets.2019.00245
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
Antimicrobial use (AMU) in animal agriculture contributes to the selection of resistant bacteria, potentially constituting a public health threat. To address antimicrobial resistance, public policies set by governments, as well as intra-sectoral approaches, can be implemented. In this paper, we explore how common policy instruments such as regulations, economic incentives, and voluntary agreements could help reduce AMU in beef production. We first describe the structure of the beef supply chain which directly influences the choice of policy instruments. We describe how externalities and imperfect information affect this system. We then discuss how five policy instruments would each perform to achieve a reduction in AMU. Bovine respiratory disease complex (BRD) represents the major driver of AMU in beef production; consequently, reducing its incidence would decrease significantly the amounts of antimicrobials administered. We consider control options for BRD at different stages of the beef supply chain.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2008, United States Standards for Beans, P1
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2013, ASS RISK HUM SALM AS
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2017, 2016 SUMM REP ANT SO
  • [4] Anses, 2018, RAPP ANN MED VET CON
  • [5] Second-best theory and the use of multiple policy instruments
    Bennear, Lori Snyder
    Stavins, Robert N.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2007, 37 (01) : 111 - 129
  • [6] Borck Hog B., 2017, DANMAP 2016 USE ANTI
  • [7] Brorsen B.W., 2002, J AGRIC APPL ECON, V34, P489, DOI DOI 10.1017/S1074070800009263
  • [8] Voluntary agreements between government and business-A scoping review of the literature with specific reference to the Public Health Responsibility Deal
    Bryden, Anna
    Petticrew, Mark
    Mays, Nicholas
    Eastmure, Elizabeth
    Knai, Cecile
    [J]. HEALTH POLICY, 2013, 110 (2-3) : 186 - 197
  • [9] Canfax Research Services, 2015, EC CONS PREC CALV, P1
  • [10] CDC, 2013, ANT RES THREATS US