Permanent Leadless Cardiac Pacing Results of the LEADLESS Trial

被引:220
作者
Reddy, Vivek Y. [1 ]
Knops, Reinoud E. [2 ]
Sperzel, Johannes
Miller, Marc A. [1 ]
Petru, Jan [4 ]
Simon, Jaroslav [3 ,4 ]
Sediva, Lucie [4 ]
de Groot, Joris R. [2 ]
Tjong, Fleur V. Y.
Jacobson, Peter [5 ]
Ostrosff, Alan [5 ]
Dukkipati, Srinivas R. [1 ]
Koruth, Jacob S. [1 ]
Wilde, Arthur A. M. [2 ]
Kautzner, Josef [6 ]
Neuzil, Petr [4 ]
机构
[1] Mt Sinai Sch Med, Helmsley Elect Ctr, New York, NY 10029 USA
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Cardiol, NL-1012 WX Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Kerckhoff Heart & Thorax Ctr, Bad Nauheim, Germany
[4] Homolka Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Prague, Czech Republic
[5] Nanostim Inc, Sunnyvale, CA USA
[6] Inst Clin & Expt Med IKEM, Dept Cardiol, Prague, Czech Republic
关键词
pacemaker; cardiac; IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER-DEFIBRILLATOR; CLINICAL-EXPERIENCE; PACEMAKER; COMPLICATIONS; MULTICENTER; PREDICTORS; SOCIETY; LEADS; STIMULATION; ARRHYTHMIAS;
D O I
10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.006987
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Conventional cardiac pacemakers are associated with several potential short- and long-term complications related to either the transvenous lead or subcutaneous pulse generator. We tested the safety and clinical performance of a novel, completely self-contained leadless cardiac pacemaker. Methods and Results The primary safety end point was freedom from complications at 90 days. Secondary performance end points included implant success rate, implant time, and measures of device performance (pacing/sensing thresholds and rate-responsive performance). The mean age of the patient cohort (n=33) was 778 years, and 67% of the patients were male (n=22/33). The most common indication for cardiac pacing was permanent atrial fibrillation with atrioventricular block (n=22, 67%). The implant success rate was 97% (n=32). Five patients (15%) required the use of >1 leadless cardiac pacemaker during the procedure. One patient developed right ventricular perforation and cardiac tamponade during the implant procedure, and eventually died as the result of a stroke. The overall complication-free rate was 94% (31/33). After 3 months of follow-up, the measures of pacing performance (sensing, impedance, and pacing threshold) either improved or were stable within the accepted range. Conclusions In a prospective nonrandomized study, a completely self-contained, single-chamber leadless cardiac pacemaker has shown to be safe and feasible. The absence of a transvenous lead and subcutaneous pulse generator could represent a paradigm shift in cardiac pacing. Clinical Trial Registration URL: http://clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01700244.
引用
收藏
页码:1466 / 1471
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Advances in cardiac pacing with leadless pacemakers and conduction system pacing
    Somani, Sulaiman
    Rogers, Albert J.
    CURRENT OPINION IN CARDIOLOGY, 2024, 39 (01) : 1 - 5
  • [22] Leadless Cardiac Pacemakers: Current status of a modern approach in pacing
    Sideris, Skevos
    Archontakis, Stefanos
    Dilaveris, Polychronis
    Gatzoulis, Konstantinos A.
    Trachanas, Konstantinos
    Sotiropoulos, Ilias
    Arsenos, Petros
    Tousoulis, Dimitrios
    Kallikazaros, Ioannis
    HELLENIC JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 58 (06) : 403 - 410
  • [23] Leadless cardiac pacing systems: current status and future prospects
    Beurskens, Niek E. G.
    Breeman, Karel T. N.
    Dasselaar, Kosse J.
    Meijer, A. Chris
    Quast, Anne-Floor B. E.
    Tjong, Fleur V. Y.
    Knops, Reinoud E.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES, 2019, 16 (11) : 923 - 930
  • [24] Tracking the motion of intracardiac structures aids the development of future leadless pacing systems
    Razeghi, Orod
    Strocchi, Marina
    Lee, Angela
    Longobardi, Stefano
    Sidhu, Baldeep S.
    Gould, Justin
    Behar, Jonathan M.
    Rajani, Ronak
    Rinaldi, Christopher A.
    Niederer, Steven A.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2020, 31 (09) : 2431 - 2439
  • [25] Chronic Performance of a Leadless Cardiac Pacemaker 1-Year Follow-Up of the LEADLESS Trial
    Knops, Reinoud E.
    Tjong, Fleur V. Y.
    Neuzil, Petr
    Sperzel, Johannes
    Miller, Marc A.
    Petru, Jan
    Simon, Jaroslav
    Sediva, Lucie
    de Groot, Joris R.
    Dukkipati, Srinivas R.
    Koruth, Jacob S.
    Wilde, Arthur A. M.
    Kautzner, Josef
    Reddy, Vivek Y.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2015, 65 (15) : 1497 - 1504
  • [26] Leadless Permanent Pacing: A Single Centre Australian Experience
    Denman, Russell A.
    Lee, Adam C.
    Mengel, Caleb
    Townsend, Simon
    Betts, John
    Bovey, Nicole
    Wright, Daniel
    Davison, Oscar
    Haqqani, Haris M.
    HEART LUNG AND CIRCULATION, 2019, 28 (11) : 1677 - 1682
  • [27] Leadless pacemakers: A new era in cardiac pacing
    Seriwala, Haseeb Munaf
    Khan, Muhammad Shahzeb
    Munir, Muhammad Bilal
    Bin Riaz, Irbaz
    Riaz, Haris
    Saba, Samir
    Voigt, Andrew H.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 67 (1-2) : 1 - 5
  • [28] New Pacing Guidelines 2021-Leadless Pacing
    Sultan, Arian
    AKTUELLE KARDIOLOGIE, 2022, 11 (03) : 252 - 256
  • [29] Leadless pacing: Going for the jugular
    Saleem-Talib, Shmaila
    van Driel, Vincent J.
    Chaldoupi, Sevasti-Maria
    Nikolic, Tanja
    van Wessel, Harry
    Borleffs, C. Jan Willem
    Ramanna, Hemanth
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2019, 42 (04): : 395 - 399
  • [30] In the wireless era: leadless pacing
    Lee, Kathy L.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF CARDIOVASCULAR THERAPY, 2010, 8 (02) : 171 - 174