Permanent Leadless Cardiac Pacing Results of the LEADLESS Trial

被引:220
作者
Reddy, Vivek Y. [1 ]
Knops, Reinoud E. [2 ]
Sperzel, Johannes
Miller, Marc A. [1 ]
Petru, Jan [4 ]
Simon, Jaroslav [3 ,4 ]
Sediva, Lucie [4 ]
de Groot, Joris R. [2 ]
Tjong, Fleur V. Y.
Jacobson, Peter [5 ]
Ostrosff, Alan [5 ]
Dukkipati, Srinivas R. [1 ]
Koruth, Jacob S. [1 ]
Wilde, Arthur A. M. [2 ]
Kautzner, Josef [6 ]
Neuzil, Petr [4 ]
机构
[1] Mt Sinai Sch Med, Helmsley Elect Ctr, New York, NY 10029 USA
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Cardiol, NL-1012 WX Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Kerckhoff Heart & Thorax Ctr, Bad Nauheim, Germany
[4] Homolka Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Prague, Czech Republic
[5] Nanostim Inc, Sunnyvale, CA USA
[6] Inst Clin & Expt Med IKEM, Dept Cardiol, Prague, Czech Republic
关键词
pacemaker; cardiac; IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER-DEFIBRILLATOR; CLINICAL-EXPERIENCE; PACEMAKER; COMPLICATIONS; MULTICENTER; PREDICTORS; SOCIETY; LEADS; STIMULATION; ARRHYTHMIAS;
D O I
10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.006987
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Conventional cardiac pacemakers are associated with several potential short- and long-term complications related to either the transvenous lead or subcutaneous pulse generator. We tested the safety and clinical performance of a novel, completely self-contained leadless cardiac pacemaker. Methods and Results The primary safety end point was freedom from complications at 90 days. Secondary performance end points included implant success rate, implant time, and measures of device performance (pacing/sensing thresholds and rate-responsive performance). The mean age of the patient cohort (n=33) was 778 years, and 67% of the patients were male (n=22/33). The most common indication for cardiac pacing was permanent atrial fibrillation with atrioventricular block (n=22, 67%). The implant success rate was 97% (n=32). Five patients (15%) required the use of >1 leadless cardiac pacemaker during the procedure. One patient developed right ventricular perforation and cardiac tamponade during the implant procedure, and eventually died as the result of a stroke. The overall complication-free rate was 94% (31/33). After 3 months of follow-up, the measures of pacing performance (sensing, impedance, and pacing threshold) either improved or were stable within the accepted range. Conclusions In a prospective nonrandomized study, a completely self-contained, single-chamber leadless cardiac pacemaker has shown to be safe and feasible. The absence of a transvenous lead and subcutaneous pulse generator could represent a paradigm shift in cardiac pacing. Clinical Trial Registration URL: http://clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01700244.
引用
收藏
页码:1466 / 1471
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Leadless Cardiac Pacing: New Horizons
    Malaczynska-Rajpold, Katarzyna
    Elliot, Mark
    Wijesuriya, Nadeev
    Mehta, Vishal
    Wong, Tom
    Rinaldi, Christopher Aldo
    Behar, Jonathan M.
    CARDIOLOGY AND THERAPY, 2023, 12 (01) : 21 - 33
  • [2] Leadless technology: a new paradigm for cardiac pacing?
    Zuccheli, Giulio
    Barletta, Valentina
    Bongiorni, Maria Grazia
    MINERVA CARDIOANGIOLOGICA, 2018, 66 (01): : 113 - 123
  • [3] Permanent Leadless Cardiac Pacemaker Therapy: A Comprehensive Review
    Tjong, Fleur V. Y.
    Reddy, Vivek Y.
    CIRCULATION, 2017, 135 (15) : 1458 - 1470
  • [4] Ten Years of Leadless Cardiac Pacing
    Breeman, Karel T. N.
    Tjong, Fleur V. Y.
    Miller, Marc A.
    Neuzil, Petr
    Dukkipati, Srinivas
    Knops, Reinoud E.
    Reddy, Vivek Y.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2024, 84 (21) : 2131 - 2147
  • [5] Leadless pacing
    Sperzel, J.
    Hamm, C.
    Hain, A.
    HERZ, 2018, 43 (07) : 605 - 611
  • [6] Leadless pacing: present and future of cardiac stimulation
    Piro, Agostino
    Lavalle, Carlo
    Della Rocca, Domenico G.
    Scarparo, Paola
    Mancone, Massimo
    Maestrini, Viviana
    Di Biase, Luigi
    Natale, Andrea
    Fedele, Francesco
    GIORNALE ITALIANO DI CARDIOLOGIA, 2019, 20 (01) : 32 - 40
  • [7] Bridging the future of cardiac stimulation: physiologic or leadless pacing?
    Piemontese, Giuseppe Pio
    Toniolo, Sebastiano
    Biffi, Mauro
    Capobianco, Claudio
    Bartoli, Lorenzo
    Sorrentino, Sergio
    Minguzzi, Alessandro
    Angeletti, Andrea
    Statuto, Giovanni
    Ziacchi, Matteo
    Martignani, Cristian
    Massaro, Giulia
    Diemberger, Igor
    Spadotto, Alberto
    REVIEWS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2022, 23 (03)
  • [8] Leadless Pacing: Therapy, Challenges and Novelties
    Wijesuriya, Nadeev
    De Vere, Felicity
    Mehta, Vishal
    Niederer, Steven
    Rinaldi, Christopher A.
    Behar, Jonathan M.
    ARRHYTHMIA & ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY REVIEW, 2023, 12
  • [9] Cardiac pacing - Will the future be exclusively leadless?
    Falk, Volkmar
    Starck, Christoph T.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES, 2016, 13 (05) : 421 - 422
  • [10] Leadless Cardiac Pacing: New Horizons
    Katarzyna Malaczynska-Rajpold
    Mark Elliot
    Nadeev Wijesuriya
    Vishal Mehta
    Tom Wong
    Christopher Aldo Rinaldi
    Jonathan M. Behar
    Cardiology and Therapy, 2023, 12 : 21 - 33