Alveolar Ridge Split on Horizontal Bone Augmentation: A Systematic Review

被引:46
|
作者
Elnayef, Basel [1 ]
Monje, Alberto [2 ]
Lin, Guo-Hao [2 ]
Gargallo-Albiol, Jordi [1 ]
Chan, Hsun-Liang [1 ]
Wang, Hom-Lay [2 ]
Hernandez-Alfaro, Federico [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Int Catalunya, Dept Oral Surg & Implantol, Barcelona, Spain
[2] Univ Michigan, Dept Periodont & Oral Med, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
alveolar ridge augmentation; bone regeneration; dental implants; osteotomy; systematic review; treatment outcome; IMMEDIATE IMPLANT PLACEMENT; ANORGANIC BOVINE BONE; EXPANSION TECHNIQUE; TOOTH EXTRACTION; MANDIBULAR RIDGE; CREST TECHNIQUE; BLOCK GRAFTS; FOLLOW-UP; MAXILLARY; RECONSTRUCTION;
D O I
10.11607/jomi.4051
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: Many techniques have been proposed to overcome the limitations displayed by maxillary atrophy. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the predictability, dimensional changes, and associated factors to successfully perform the alveolar ridge split (ARS) technique of augmentation. Materials and Methods: An electronic and manual literature searches was conducted by two independent reviewers in several databases, including Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Cochrane Oral Health Group Trials Register, for articles written in English up to February 2014. A manual search was also performed to ensure a thorough screening process. Based on the PICO (problem, intervention, comparison, outcome) model, the chief question of this study was: Can patients with horizontal ridge deficiency be successfully treated with the ARS technique and implant therapy? Results: Overall, 17 articles met the inclusion criteria, and a subsequent meta-analysis was performed. A Cohen kappa interagreement rate of 0.82 was reached. The implant survival rate of the included studies was 97.0% (range, 94.4% to 100%) with the full-thickness flap (FTF) approach and 95.7% (range, 86.6% to 100%) with the partial-thickness flap (PTF) approach. The weighted mean (WM) of horizontal bone width gain was calculated for included studies using FTF for the ARS technique. Four studies that had data were included in the meta-analysis. The WM +/- standard deviation of bone width gain was 3.19 +/- 1.19 mm (range, 2.00 to 4.03 mm). For studies using PTF for ARS, only one study provided mean and standard deviation of horizontal bone width gain (4.13 +/- 3.13 mm); hence, meta-analysis could not be performed. Buccal wall fracture represented the most frequent postoperative complication, followed by postoperative ridge resorption. Conclusion: In selected scenarios, the ARS technique might represent a predictable approach as demonstrated by a high implant survival rate, adequate horizontal bone gain, and minimal intra-and postoperative complications. Further research is needed to determine the influence of the grafting materials inserted and flap tissue biotype, as well as the anatomical characteristics on final bone augmentation outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:596 / 606
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Assessment of clinical outcomes and histomorphometric findings in alveolar ridge augmentation procedures with allogeneic bone block grafts: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Perez-Gonzalez, Fabian
    Molinero-Mourelle, Pedro
    Sanchez-Labrador, Luis
    Saez-Alcaide, Luis Miguel
    Limones, Alvaro
    Cortes-Breton Brinkmann, Jorge
    Lopez-Quiles, Juan
    MEDICINA ORAL PATOLOGIA ORAL Y CIRUGIA BUCAL, 2020, 25 (02): : E291 - E298
  • [42] Lateral Alveolar Ridge Augmentation with an Autogenous Bone Block Graft Alone with or without Barrier Membrane Coverage: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Gorgis, Romario
    Qazo, Lianna
    Bruun, Niels Henrik
    Starch-Jensen, Thomas
    JOMR-JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL RESEARCH, 2021, 12 (03):
  • [43] Are there specific indications for the different alveolar bone augmentation procedures for implant placement? A systematic review
    Milinkovic, I.
    Cordaro, L.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2014, 43 (05) : 606 - 625
  • [44] Horizontal and Vertical Ridge Augmentation in Localized Alveolar Deficient Sites: A Retrospective Case Series
    Annibali, Susanna
    Bignozzi, Isabella
    Sammartino, Gilberto
    La Monaca, Gerardo
    Cristalli, Maria Paola
    IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2012, 21 (03) : 175 - 185
  • [45] Clinical performance of alveolar ridge augmentation with xenogeneic bone block grafts versus autogenous bone block grafts. A systematic review
    Sanchez-Labrador, Luis
    Molinero-Mourelle, Pedro
    Perez-Gonzalez, Fabian
    Saez-Alcaide, Luis Miguel
    Brinkmann, Jorge Cortes-Breton
    Martinez, Juan Lopez-Quiles
    Martinez-Gonzalez, Jose Maria
    JOURNAL OF STOMATOLOGY ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2021, 122 (03) : 293 - 302
  • [46] Alveolar ridge augmentation with cortical osteotomies for dental implantation
    Lalo, J.
    Verrons, A-S
    Lezy, J-P
    REVUE DE STOMATOLOGIE DE CHIRURGIE MAXILLO-FACIALE ET DE CHIRURGIE ORALE, 2012, 113 (04) : 276 - 290
  • [47] Alveolar ridge augmentation by distraction osteogenesis
    Rachmiel, A
    Srouji, S
    Peled, M
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2001, 30 (06) : 510 - 517
  • [48] Vertical Ridge Gain with Various Bone Augmentation Techniques: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Hameed, Muhammad Hasan
    Gul, Meisha
    Ghafoor, Robia
    Khan, Farhan Raza
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2019, 28 (04): : 421 - 427
  • [49] The alveolar ridge splitting/expansion technique: a systematic review
    Bassetti, Mario A.
    Bassetti, Renzo G.
    Bosshardt, Dieter D.
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2016, 27 (03) : 310 - 324
  • [50] Tissue-engineered bone for lateral alveolar ridge augmentation: A case report
    Strietzel, FP
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2006, 21 (01) : 131 - 135