Alveolar Ridge Split on Horizontal Bone Augmentation: A Systematic Review

被引:46
|
作者
Elnayef, Basel [1 ]
Monje, Alberto [2 ]
Lin, Guo-Hao [2 ]
Gargallo-Albiol, Jordi [1 ]
Chan, Hsun-Liang [1 ]
Wang, Hom-Lay [2 ]
Hernandez-Alfaro, Federico [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Int Catalunya, Dept Oral Surg & Implantol, Barcelona, Spain
[2] Univ Michigan, Dept Periodont & Oral Med, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
alveolar ridge augmentation; bone regeneration; dental implants; osteotomy; systematic review; treatment outcome; IMMEDIATE IMPLANT PLACEMENT; ANORGANIC BOVINE BONE; EXPANSION TECHNIQUE; TOOTH EXTRACTION; MANDIBULAR RIDGE; CREST TECHNIQUE; BLOCK GRAFTS; FOLLOW-UP; MAXILLARY; RECONSTRUCTION;
D O I
10.11607/jomi.4051
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: Many techniques have been proposed to overcome the limitations displayed by maxillary atrophy. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the predictability, dimensional changes, and associated factors to successfully perform the alveolar ridge split (ARS) technique of augmentation. Materials and Methods: An electronic and manual literature searches was conducted by two independent reviewers in several databases, including Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Cochrane Oral Health Group Trials Register, for articles written in English up to February 2014. A manual search was also performed to ensure a thorough screening process. Based on the PICO (problem, intervention, comparison, outcome) model, the chief question of this study was: Can patients with horizontal ridge deficiency be successfully treated with the ARS technique and implant therapy? Results: Overall, 17 articles met the inclusion criteria, and a subsequent meta-analysis was performed. A Cohen kappa interagreement rate of 0.82 was reached. The implant survival rate of the included studies was 97.0% (range, 94.4% to 100%) with the full-thickness flap (FTF) approach and 95.7% (range, 86.6% to 100%) with the partial-thickness flap (PTF) approach. The weighted mean (WM) of horizontal bone width gain was calculated for included studies using FTF for the ARS technique. Four studies that had data were included in the meta-analysis. The WM +/- standard deviation of bone width gain was 3.19 +/- 1.19 mm (range, 2.00 to 4.03 mm). For studies using PTF for ARS, only one study provided mean and standard deviation of horizontal bone width gain (4.13 +/- 3.13 mm); hence, meta-analysis could not be performed. Buccal wall fracture represented the most frequent postoperative complication, followed by postoperative ridge resorption. Conclusion: In selected scenarios, the ARS technique might represent a predictable approach as demonstrated by a high implant survival rate, adequate horizontal bone gain, and minimal intra-and postoperative complications. Further research is needed to determine the influence of the grafting materials inserted and flap tissue biotype, as well as the anatomical characteristics on final bone augmentation outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:596 / 606
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Horizontal Augmentation Through the Ridge-Split Procedure: A Predictable Surgical Modality in Implant Reconstruction
    Tolstunov, Len
    Hicke, Bruce
    JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2013, 39 (01) : 59 - 68
  • [32] Alveolar ridge augmentation using the shell technique with allogeneic and autogenous bone plates in a split-mouth design-A retrospective case report from five patients
    Tunkel, Jochen
    de Stavola, Luca
    Kloss-Brandstaetter, Anita
    CLINICAL CASE REPORTS, 2021, 9 (02): : 947 - 959
  • [33] A Novel Approach for Horizontal Augmentation of Posterior Maxilla Using Ridge Split Technique
    Karan, Nazife Begum
    Akinci, Huseyin Ozan
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2019, 30 (05) : 1584 - 1588
  • [34] Assessment of the potential of growth factors for localized alveolar ridge augmentation: a systematic review
    Jung, Ronald E.
    Thoma, Daniel S.
    Hammerle, Christoph H. F.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2008, 35 : 255 - 281
  • [35] Lateral augmentation of the jaw by the split expansion ridge technique. A critical review
    Artzi, Zvi
    PERIODONTOLOGY 2000, 2023, 93 (01) : 205 - 220
  • [36] Application of modified alveolar ridge augmentation technique for horizontal bone augmentation in posterior mandibular region: Report of 3 cases
    Chu, Shunli
    Xu, Hongwei
    Li, Xianjing
    Guo, Tianqi
    Ting, Zhu
    Zhou, Yanmin
    CLINICAL CASE REPORTS, 2019, 7 (12): : 2548 - 2564
  • [37] Long-Term Survival Rates of Titanium Implants Placed in Expanded Alveolar Ridges Using Split Crest Procedures: A Systematic Review
    Mestas, Gianfranco
    Alarcon, Marco
    Chambrone, Leandro
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2016, 31 (03) : 591 - 599
  • [38] Alveolar ridge reconstruction with titanium meshes: A systematic review of the literature
    dal Polo, Marco Rasia
    Poli, Pier-Paolo
    Rancitelli, Davide
    Beretta, Mario
    Maiorana, Carlo
    MEDICINA ORAL PATOLOGIA ORAL Y CIRUGIA BUCAL, 2014, 19 (06): : E639 - E646
  • [39] Alveolar ridge preservation. A systematic review
    Attila Horváth
    Nikos Mardas
    Luis André Mezzomo
    Ian G. Needleman
    Nikos Donos
    Clinical Oral Investigations, 2013, 17 : 341 - 363
  • [40] Alveolar ridge preservation. A systematic review
    Horvath, Attila
    Mardas, Nikos
    Mezzomo, Luis Andre
    Needleman, Ian G.
    Donos, Nikos
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2013, 17 (02) : 341 - 363