Alveolar Ridge Split on Horizontal Bone Augmentation: A Systematic Review

被引:46
|
作者
Elnayef, Basel [1 ]
Monje, Alberto [2 ]
Lin, Guo-Hao [2 ]
Gargallo-Albiol, Jordi [1 ]
Chan, Hsun-Liang [1 ]
Wang, Hom-Lay [2 ]
Hernandez-Alfaro, Federico [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Int Catalunya, Dept Oral Surg & Implantol, Barcelona, Spain
[2] Univ Michigan, Dept Periodont & Oral Med, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
alveolar ridge augmentation; bone regeneration; dental implants; osteotomy; systematic review; treatment outcome; IMMEDIATE IMPLANT PLACEMENT; ANORGANIC BOVINE BONE; EXPANSION TECHNIQUE; TOOTH EXTRACTION; MANDIBULAR RIDGE; CREST TECHNIQUE; BLOCK GRAFTS; FOLLOW-UP; MAXILLARY; RECONSTRUCTION;
D O I
10.11607/jomi.4051
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: Many techniques have been proposed to overcome the limitations displayed by maxillary atrophy. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the predictability, dimensional changes, and associated factors to successfully perform the alveolar ridge split (ARS) technique of augmentation. Materials and Methods: An electronic and manual literature searches was conducted by two independent reviewers in several databases, including Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Cochrane Oral Health Group Trials Register, for articles written in English up to February 2014. A manual search was also performed to ensure a thorough screening process. Based on the PICO (problem, intervention, comparison, outcome) model, the chief question of this study was: Can patients with horizontal ridge deficiency be successfully treated with the ARS technique and implant therapy? Results: Overall, 17 articles met the inclusion criteria, and a subsequent meta-analysis was performed. A Cohen kappa interagreement rate of 0.82 was reached. The implant survival rate of the included studies was 97.0% (range, 94.4% to 100%) with the full-thickness flap (FTF) approach and 95.7% (range, 86.6% to 100%) with the partial-thickness flap (PTF) approach. The weighted mean (WM) of horizontal bone width gain was calculated for included studies using FTF for the ARS technique. Four studies that had data were included in the meta-analysis. The WM +/- standard deviation of bone width gain was 3.19 +/- 1.19 mm (range, 2.00 to 4.03 mm). For studies using PTF for ARS, only one study provided mean and standard deviation of horizontal bone width gain (4.13 +/- 3.13 mm); hence, meta-analysis could not be performed. Buccal wall fracture represented the most frequent postoperative complication, followed by postoperative ridge resorption. Conclusion: In selected scenarios, the ARS technique might represent a predictable approach as demonstrated by a high implant survival rate, adequate horizontal bone gain, and minimal intra-and postoperative complications. Further research is needed to determine the influence of the grafting materials inserted and flap tissue biotype, as well as the anatomical characteristics on final bone augmentation outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:596 / 606
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A novel approach for horizontal augmentation with split box: A method that combines split bone block and ridge split techniques
    Dergin, Guhan
    Can, Sinem Busra kirac
    Can, Serhat
    JOURNAL OF STOMATOLOGY ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2024, 125 (06)
  • [22] Alveolar ridge augmentation with the perforated and nonperforated bone grafts
    de Avila, Erica Dorigatti
    Scarso Filho, Jose
    de Oliveira Ramalho, Lizete Toledo
    Real Gabrielli, Mario Francisco
    Pereira Filho, Valfrido Antonio
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTAL AND IMPLANT SCIENCE, 2014, 44 (01) : 33 - 38
  • [23] The outcome of intraoral onlay block bone grafts on alveolar ridge augmentations: A systematic review
    Aloy-Prosper, Amparo
    Penarrocha-Oltra, David
    Penarrocha-Diago, Maria
    Penarrocha-Diago, Miguel
    MEDICINA ORAL PATOLOGIA ORAL Y CIRUGIA BUCAL, 2015, 20 (02): : E251 - E258
  • [24] Lateral Alveolar Ridge Augmentation with Autogenous Tooth Block Graft Compared with Autogenous Bone Block Graft: a Systematic Review
    Starch-Jensen, Thomas
    Vitenson, Julie
    Deluiz, Daniel
    Ostergaard, Kimie Bols
    Tinoco, Eduardo Muniz Barretto
    JOMR-JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL RESEARCH, 2022, 13 (01):
  • [25] Clinical Outcomes of Alveolar Ridge Augmentation with In Situ Autogenous Block Bone: A Retrospective Review
    Yang, Zinan
    Liang, Qian
    Lu, Haibin
    Chu, Hongxing
    Gan, Zekun
    Rong, Mingdeng
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2021, 36 (05) : 1008 - 1015
  • [26] Alveolar ridge augmentation with the Bone Into Bone technique: a histological and histomorphometric analysis
    Lopez, M. A.
    Passarelli, P. C.
    Rella, E.
    Netti, A.
    Lopez, A.
    Casale, M.
    D'Addona, A.
    JOURNAL OF OSSEOINTEGRATION, 2021, 13 (03) : 121 - 126
  • [27] Tooth shell versus bone shell technique for horizontal maxillary alveolar ridge augmentation
    Awad, Khaled Ahmed Ibrahim
    Tawik, Mohamed Abdel-Monem
    Hussein, Mohamed Mohamed
    El-Farag, Shaimaa Ahmed Abo
    Sameaa, Sally El Sayed Abdel
    BMC ORAL HEALTH, 2025, 25 (01):
  • [28] Simple Bone Augmentation for Alveolar Ridge Defects
    Haggerty, Christopher J.
    Vogel, Christopher T.
    Fisher, G. Rawleigh
    ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2015, 27 (02) : 203 - +
  • [29] Preparation of allogeneic bone for alveolar ridge augmentation
    Krasny, Kornel
    Kaminski, Artur
    Krasny, Marta
    Czech, Tomasz
    Wojtowicz, Andrzej
    CELL AND TISSUE BANKING, 2017, 18 (03) : 313 - 321
  • [30] Extensive augmentation of the alveolar ridge using autogenous calvarial split bone grafts for dental rehabilitation
    Iizuka, T
    Smolka, W
    Hallermann, W
    Mericske-Stern, R
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2004, 15 (05) : 607 - 615