Multi-level safety climate associations with safety behaviors in the fire service

被引:24
作者
Smith, Todd D. [1 ]
DeJoy, David M. [2 ]
Dyal, Mari-Amanda [3 ]
Pu, Yongjia [4 ]
Dickinson, Stephanie [4 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ, Sch Publ Hlth Bloomington, Dept Appl Hlth Sci, 1025 E 7th St,Rm 116, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
[2] Univ Georgia, Coll Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Promot & Behav, Workplace Hlth Grp, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[3] Kennesaw State Univ, Dept Hlth Promot & Phys Educ, Kennesaw, GA 30144 USA
[4] Indiana Univ, Sch Publ Hlth Bloomington, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Bloomington, IN USA
关键词
INTERRATER RELIABILITY; SOCIAL-EXCHANGE; FIT INDEXES; PERFORMANCE; MANAGEMENT; MODEL; CITIZENSHIP; CULTURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jsr.2019.02.005
中图分类号
TB18 [人体工程学];
学科分类号
1201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Limited research associated with safety climate has been completed within the fire service. Given this dearth of information, the present study sought to identify a valid and reliable measure of safety climate at both the workgroup and organizational levels within the fire service. Methods: Researchers surveyed 994 firefighters in two large metropolitan fire departments. Preliminary analyses including psychometrics, confirmatory factor analyses, and shared perception analyses were completed. A linear mixed model analysis was then completed to assess the relationships between workgroup safety climate, organizational safety climate, and safety behaviors, including both safety compliance and safety citizenship behaviors. Results: Measures of safety climate at the workgroup (WGSC) and organizational levels (OSC) were derived. WGSC factors include supervisor support (alpha = 0.92), vertical cohesion (alpha = 0.89), and horizontal cohesion (alpha = 0.94). OSC factors include management commitment (alpha = 0.91), safety programs/policies (alpha = 0.89), perceived fairness (alpha = 0.86) and incident command (alpha = 0.90). Confirmatory factor analyses confirmed our multi-factor models were a good fit to the data. The linear mixed model analysis found that WGSC positively predicted safety compliance behavior (B = 0.13, p <.001) and safety citizenship behavior (B = 0.22, p <.001) and OSC positively predicted safety compliance behavior (B = 0.16, p <.001) and safety citizenship behavior (B = 0.15, p <.001). Conclusions: This work presents reliable and valid measures of both workgroup and organizational safety climate, which have positive relationships with safety behavior outcomes. Practical application: The measures, which were developed through an extensive multi-method process, provide a means for researchers and practitioners to assess safety climate in the fire service and provides guidance for future safety climate research, including informing intervention research, which could potentially bolster safety climate and enhance safety in the fire service. (C) 2019 National Safety Council and Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:53 / 60
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Safety climate and safety behaviors in the construction industry: The importance of co-workers commitment to safety
    Schwatka, Natalie V.
    Rosecrance, John C.
    WORK-A JOURNAL OF PREVENTION ASSESSMENT & REHABILITATION, 2016, 54 (02): : 401 - 413
  • [32] Bivalent fears of evaluation: A developmentally-informed, multi-informant, and multi-modal examination of associations with safety behaviors
    Racz, Sarah J.
    Qasmieh, Noor
    Reyes, Andres De Los
    JOURNAL OF ANXIETY DISORDERS, 2024, 103
  • [33] A Multi-Domain instrument for safety Climate: Military safety climate questionnaire (MSCQ) and NOSACQ-50
    Schuler, M.
    Matuszczyk, J. Vega
    SAFETY SCIENCE, 2022, 154
  • [34] Effects of a behavior-based safety observation program: Promoting safe behaviors and safety climate at work
    Yang, Eunhwa
    Kim, Yujin
    Rodgers, Charner
    WORK-A JOURNAL OF PREVENTION ASSESSMENT & REHABILITATION, 2024, 77 (01): : 133 - 145
  • [35] Climate as situational strength: Safety climate strength as a cross-level moderator of the relationship between conscientiousness and safety behaviour
    Lee, Sunhee
    Dalal, Reeshad S.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF WORK AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 25 (01) : 120 - 132
  • [36] The effects of service climate and the effective leadership behaviour of supervisors on frontline employee service quality: A multi-level analysis
    Hui, C. Harry
    Chiu, Warren C. K.
    Yu, Philip L. H.
    Cheng, Kevin
    Tse, Herman H. M.
    JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 80 : 151 - 172
  • [37] Study on safety characteristics of the spur gear pair considering time-varying backlash in the established multi-level safety domains
    Li, Zheng-Fa
    Zhu, Ling-Yun
    Chen, Shi-Qian
    Chen, Zai-Gang
    Gou, Xiang-Feng
    NONLINEAR DYNAMICS, 2022, 109 (03) : 1297 - 1324
  • [38] Perceptions of safety climate across construction personnel: Associations with injury rates
    Marin, Luz S.
    Lipscomb, Hester
    Cifuentes, Manuel
    Punnett, Laura
    SAFETY SCIENCE, 2019, 118 : 487 - 496
  • [39] Lean manufacturing implementation, context and behaviors of multi-level leadership A mixed-methods exploratory research
    Tortorella, Guilherme
    Fettermann, Diego
    Anzanello, Michel
    Sawhney, Rapinder
    JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2017, 28 (07) : 867 - 891
  • [40] Safety-Specific Leadership, Goal Orientation, and Near-Miss Recognition: The Cross-Level Moderating Effects of Safety Climate
    Lu, Hongxu
    Wu, Ting
    Shao, Yan
    Liu, Yanbin
    Wang, Xiaoxuan
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 10