An integrated fuzzy MCDM approach and analysis to evaluate the financial performance of Iranian cement companies

被引:29
作者
Moghimi, Rohollah [1 ]
Anvari, Alireza [2 ]
机构
[1] Gachsaran Branch IAU, Dept Ind Management, Gachsaran, Iran
[2] Gachsaran Branch IAU, Dept Ind Engn & Management, Gachsaran, Iran
关键词
Fuzzy AHP; TOPSIS; Performance assessment; Cement companies; GROUP DECISION-MAKING; EXTENT ANALYSIS METHOD; LOCATION SELECTION; HIERARCHY PROCESS; AHP; QUALITY; SERVICE; SYSTEM; VENDOR; MODEL;
D O I
10.1007/s00170-013-5370-6
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
In today's highly competitive environment, suitable appraisal of a company's performance is of vital importance not only for the company but also for its suppliers and customers. The main objectives of this study were to analyze the financial ratios of Iranian cement-producing companies and to develop a fuzzy model to evaluate financial performance. The proposed fuzzy approach is based on the fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (FAHP) and the technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) method. In contrast to other studies in the literature, in the present study, the FAHP method was used in determining the weightage of criteria by decision makers and the TOPSIS method was used in determining the ranking of the companies. The proposed combined method was used to evaluate the performance of eight Iranian cement companies listed in the Tehran Stock Exchange using data from their financial tables and subsequent ranking of these companies. The final results of the analysis revealed the performance ranking of the companies Sabhan, Sarab, Sedasht, Safar, Sekaroun, Sakarma, Sanir, and Sahrmoz with priority scores of 0/55, 0/51, 0/50, 0/49, 0/42, 0/37, 0/36, and 0/33, respectively. The results indicate an overall performance ranking because the weights of the criteria were determined by decision makers with different experiences, positions, and proficiencies. If it is desired, it is possible to make an evaluation only for creditors, investors, or shareholders; however, in such cases, the weights of the criteria will vary and the ranking of the companies can change. The proposed method can also be applied to the evaluation of companies in other sectors.
引用
收藏
页码:685 / 698
页数:14
相关论文
共 79 条
[1]   Evaluation of CIM technologies in saudi industries using AHP [J].
Al-Ahmari, A. M. A. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 34 (7-8) :736-747
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2011, INT J COMPUT NETWORK
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1981, MULTIPLE ATTRIBUTES
[4]   A group AHP-based tool to evaluate effective factors toward leanness in automotive industries [J].
Anvan A.R. ;
Mojahed M. ;
Zulkifh N. ;
Yusuff R.M. ;
Ismail Y. ;
Hojjati S.M.H. .
Journal of Applied Sciences, 2011, 11 (17) :3142-3151
[5]  
Asgharpour MJ, 2010, MULTIPLE CRITERIA DE
[6]   A fuzzy AHP approach to evaluating machine tool alternatives [J].
Ayag, Z ;
Özdemir, RG .
JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT MANUFACTURING, 2006, 17 (02) :179-190
[7]   Performance measurement model for Turkish aviation firms using the rough-AHP and TOPSIS methods under fuzzy environment [J].
Aydogan, Emel Kizilkaya .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2011, 38 (04) :3992-3998
[8]   A unique fuzzy multi-criteria decision making: computer simulation approach for productive operators' assignment in cellular manufacturing systems with uncertainty and vagueness [J].
Azadeh, Ali ;
Nazari-Shirkouhi, Salman ;
Hatami-Shirkouhi, Loghman ;
Ansarinejad, Ayyub .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 56 (1-4) :329-343
[9]  
Bakhtiari P, 2000, FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
[10]  
Basligil H, 2005, SIGMA J ENG NAT SCI, V23, P24