Is public investment complementary to private investment in Indian agriculture? Evidence from NARDL approach

被引:18
作者
Akber, Nusrat [1 ]
Paltasingh, Kirtti Ranjan [1 ]
机构
[1] SMVD Univ, Sch Econ, Jammu, Jammu & Kashmir, India
关键词
credit; crowding-in; out; farm investment; Indian agriculture; NARDL model; E22; Q17; Q14; AUTOREGRESSIVE TIME-SERIES; CAPITAL FORMATION; UNIT-ROOT; HYPOTHESIS; GROWTH;
D O I
10.1111/agec.12515
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
The issue of complementarity between public farm investment and private farm investment in Indian agriculture is an unsettled empirical question in the literature, which has not been studied adequately. Few studies analyzing the trends of both types of investments have produced contradictory results. Thus, this study attempts to bridge that gap, by examining the hypothesis of crowding-in/crowding-out effect of public sector investment on private investment. Time series data for a period of 45 years from 1971 to 2015 has been used. Adopting a 'nonlinear auto-regressive distributive lag' (NARDL) model the study confirms a strong crowding-in effect of public investment on private investment in short run, but relatively a weak complementarity between the two over long-run. Moreover, the public canal intensity as a major component of public investment has been observed to have much stronger effect on private investment than the public investment itself. It is also found that private investment is constrained by its own lagged values, institutional credit and terms of trade during both short-run and long-run. The policy suggestion of this study calls for an immediate arrest of declining trend of public investment.
引用
收藏
页码:643 / 655
页数:13
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Does financial development asymmetrically affect CO2 emissions in China? An application of the nonlinear autoregressive distributed lag (NARDL) model [J].
Ahmad, Manzoor ;
Khan, Zeeshan ;
Rahman, Zia Ur ;
Khan, Shehzad .
CARBON MANAGEMENT, 2018, 9 (06) :631-644
[2]   Impact of institutions and public research on private agricultural research [J].
Alfranca, O ;
Huffman, WE .
AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2001, 25 (2-3) :191-198
[3]  
Alka Singh Alka Singh, 2015, Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, V70, P246
[4]  
Ballabh V., 2016, VICISSITUDES AGR FAS, P377
[5]  
Blejer M., 1984, Finance and Development, V21, P26
[6]  
BLEJER MI, 1984, INT MONET FUND S PAP, V31, P379
[7]  
Broock W. A., 1996, Econometric Reviews, V15, P197, DOI [DOI 10.1080/07474939608800353, https://doi.org/10.1080/07474939608800353]
[8]  
Chand R., 2000, 11 NAT CTR AGR EC PO
[9]  
Dhawan B. D., 1996, Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, V51, P209
[10]  
Dhawan BD, 1997, ECON POLIT WEEKLY, V32, P710