The influence of luting cement on the probabilities of survival and modes of failure of cast full-coverage crowns

被引:38
作者
Mitchell, CA
Abbariki, M
Orr, JF
机构
[1] Queens Univ Belfast, Royal Victoria Hosp, Sch Clin Dent, Div Restorat Dent, Belfast BT12 6BP, Antrim, North Ireland
[2] Queens Univ Belfast, Sch Mech & Mfg Engn, Belfast BT12 6BP, Antrim, North Ireland
关键词
dental cements; dental restoration; permanent crowns; Weibull analysis;
D O I
10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00009-9
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives. This study compares the probabilities of survival and modes of failure of cast full-coverage crowns bonded with five cements when subjected to tensile pull-off testing. Methods. Five groups of 25 sound human premolar teeth wen prepared for full-coverage crowns, impressions recorded and customized castings fabricated in Ni-Cr-Mb bonding alloy. The cements tested were zinc phosphate, a hand-mixed and capsulated conventional glass-ionomer cement, a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement and a resin composite luting cement. The cemented crowns were stared in water at 37 degrees C for 24 h prior to application of a tensile pull-off force at a strain rate of 10 mm/min. The loads at failure were ranked and modelled by derived Weibull functions each describing the probability of a given specimen failing under a given load. Non-parametric statistical analysis was also applied to the results. Results. There were no significant differences between the loads at failure of zinc phosphate cement, the hand-mixed or the capsulated glass-ionomer cements. The resin-modified glass-ionomer cement and the resin composite cement failed at significantly higher loads than the other three cements, but were not significantly different from each other. The Weibull modulus ranking for each cement from highest to lowest was resin composite = zinc phosphate, resin-modified glass-ionomer, hand-mixed conventional glass-ionomer and capsulated conventional glass-ionomer cement. Significance. Weibull analysis allows dentists to compare the probability of survival of a crown bonded with different cements at a chosen load giving an indication of cement reliability. (C) 2000 Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:198 / 206
页数:9
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
Beech D R, 1985, Dent Mater, V1, P154, DOI 10.1016/S0109-5641(85)80009-9
[2]  
Black S M, 1989, Restorative Dent, V5, P39
[3]   DENTAL CEMENTS - ARE THEY THE WEAK LINK [J].
CHRISTENSEN, GJ .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 1991, 122 (12) :63-64
[4]  
CHUPEIN TF, 1879, DENT COSMOS, V21, P695
[5]  
Creyke WEC, 1982, DESIGN NONDUCTILE MA
[6]   Current status of luting agents for fixed prosthodontics [J].
Diaz-Arnold, AM ;
Vargas, MA ;
Haselton, DR .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1999, 81 (02) :135-141
[7]   Retentive strengths of cast gold crowns using glass ionomer, compomer, or resin cement [J].
Ernst, CP ;
Wenzl, N ;
Stender, E ;
Willershausen, B .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1998, 79 (04) :472-476
[8]   RETENTIVE STRENGTH, DISINTEGRATION, AND MARGINAL QUALITY OF LUTING CEMENTS [J].
GORODOVSKY, S ;
ZIDAN, O .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1992, 68 (02) :269-274
[9]  
Holtz P, 1977, BRIT DENT J, V142, P41
[10]   A SURVEY OF GENERAL DENTAL PRACTITIONERS APPROACH TO THE RESTORATION OF ROOT-FILLED TEETH [J].
HUSSEY, DL ;
KILLOUGH, SA .
INTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL, 1995, 28 (02) :91-94