Research and development and trade policies for product innovation in the presence of foreign competition

被引:9
作者
Buryi, Pavlo [1 ]
Lahiri, Sajal [2 ]
机构
[1] Harrisburg Univ Sci & Technol, Harrisburg, PA USA
[2] Southern Illinois Univ Carbondale, Dept Econ, Carbondale, IL 62901 USA
关键词
Product innovation; R&D; Matching subsidy; Foreign competition; Tariffs; DEVELOPMENT SUBSIDIES; INTERNATIONAL COMPETITION; IMPORT COMPETITION; INFANT INDUSTRIES; QUALITY; INVESTMENT; STIMULATE; DUOPOLY; GROWTH; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.econmod.2018.11.026
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper examines two policy instruments a matching grant and import tariffs for encouraging research and development (R&D) in product innovation by a domestic firm when it faces foreign competition. We do so by developing a theoretical model of product innovation where R&D effort is endogenous and its outcome uncertain. We examine the effects of a reduction in import tariffs on private expenditure on R&D, on public support for such R&D, and on total R&D expenditure. We find that in response to a reduction in import tariffs, the domestic firm always reduces its private R&D investments, but the total level of R&D expenditure (i.e., including public support) might go up depending on the level of tariffs. In particular, we find that it will go up if the initial level of tariff is higher than a critical level. When tariff is endogenous, we find that the socially optimal level of tariffs is positive. One finding that is of particular interest is that supporting private attempts to product innovate in the form of a matching grant program leads to a socially optimal level of product R&D.
引用
收藏
页码:429 / 440
页数:12
相关论文
共 76 条
[1]   On tariff and quality innovation in a market with discrete preferences [J].
Acharyya, Rajat ;
Banerjee, Swapnendu .
ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2012, 29 (03) :917-925
[2]   A MODEL OF GROWTH THROUGH CREATIVE DESTRUCTION [J].
AGHION, P ;
HOWITT, P .
ECONOMETRICA, 1992, 60 (02) :323-351
[3]   Competition and innovation: An inverted-U relationship [J].
Aghion, P ;
Bloom, N ;
Blundell, R ;
Griffith, R ;
Howitt, P .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2005, 120 (02) :701-728
[4]  
Aghion P., 2002, NBER WORKING PAPERS, V9269
[5]  
Ahmed K., 2016, ARTHANITI, V15, P1
[6]   IMPORT COMPETITION AND QUALITY UPGRADING [J].
Amiti, Mary ;
Khandelwal, Amit K. .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2013, 95 (02) :476-490
[7]   THE SENSITIVITY OF STRATEGIC AND CORRECTIVE RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT POLICY IN OLIGOPOLISTIC INDUSTRIES [J].
BAGWELL, K ;
STAIGER, RW .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 1994, 36 (1-2) :133-150
[8]   What Do Trade Negotiators Negotiate About? Empirical Evidence from the World Trade Organization [J].
Bagwell, Kyle ;
Staiger, Robert W. .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2011, 101 (04) :1238-1273
[9]   CASE AGAINST INFANT-INDUSTRY TARIFF PROTECTION [J].
BALDWIN, RE .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1969, 77 (03) :295-305
[10]   Growth, economies of scale, and targeting in Japan (1955-1990) [J].
Beason, R ;
Weinstein, DE .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 1996, 78 (02) :286-295