An overview of factors for the adoption of energy efficient eco-innovation: The cases of the Dutch brewing and paper industry

被引:13
作者
Chappin, Maryse M. H. [1 ]
van den Oever, Maurice V. D. [2 ]
Negro, Simona O. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Fac Geosci, Copernicus Inst Sustainable Dev, Innovat Studies, Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Deloitte Risk Advisory BV, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Eco-innovation; Adoption; Innovation process; Sustainability; Sustainable innovation; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL INNOVATION; SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; ETHICAL CULTURE; MANAGEMENT; ORGANIZATIONS; DETERMINANTS; CERTIFICATION; MOTIVATION; SYNERGIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124122
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study develops a framework of internal and external factors that influence the adoption of eco-innovation. We studied 80 adoption processes in the Dutch brewing industry and the Dutch paper industry and analysed the relative importance of different factors. We find that internal factors were more important than external factors. The analysis also shows differences between the industries. The financial advantage was important for both industries, but especially for the paper industry. For the brewing industry, ethical responsibility and stakeholders played a more important role in the adoption. The analysis also revealed differences for small and large firms. Ethical responsibility and stakeholders are relatively more often mentioned by small firms, whereas clear objectives and regulations were mentioned more by large firms. Our study highlights that the adoption of eco-innovation is a complex process and the position in the supply chain as well as the size of a firm influence what is important in the adoption of eco-innovation. (C) 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 95 条
[1]   Organizational support for intrapreneurship and its interaction with human capital to enhance innovative performance [J].
Alpkan, Lutfihak ;
Bulut, Cagri ;
Gunday, Gurhan ;
Ulusoy, Gunduz ;
Kilic, Kemal .
MANAGEMENT DECISION, 2010, 48 (5-6) :732-755
[2]   Systems approach to corporate sustainability - A general management framework [J].
Azapagic, A .
PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 2003, 81 (B5) :303-316
[3]   Evolving sustainably: A longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development [J].
Bansal, P .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2005, 26 (03) :197-218
[4]   Lead markets and regulation: a framework for analyzing the international diffusion of environmental innovations [J].
Beise, M ;
Rennings, K .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2005, 52 (01) :5-17
[5]  
Benn S, 2014, UNDERST ORGAN CHANG, P1
[6]  
Benn S., 2006, AUSTRALAS J ENV MAN, V13, P156, DOI DOI 10.1080/14486563.2006.10648683
[7]   The drivers for adoption of eco-innovation [J].
Bossle, Marilia Bonzanini ;
de Barcellos, Marcia Dutra ;
Vieira, Luciana Marques ;
Sauvee, Loic .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 113 :861-872
[8]  
Burhan A.H. N., 2012, Journal of Economics, Business Accountancy Ventura, V15, P257, DOI [10.14414/jebav.v15i2.79, DOI 10.14414/JEBAV.V15I2.79]
[9]   A fuzzy analytic hierarchy process method to support materiality assessment in sustainability reporting [J].
Calabrese, Armando ;
Costa, Roberta ;
Levialdi, Nathan ;
Menichini, Tamara .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 121 :248-264
[10]  
Carrillo-Hermosilla J., 2009, Eco-Innovation, P6, DOI [DOI 10.1057/9780230244856_2, 10.1057/9780230244856, DOI 10.1057/9780230244856]