Computational Methodology for the Allocation of Work and Interaction in Human-Robot Teams

被引:14
作者
Ijtsma, Martijn [1 ]
Ma, Lanssie M. [1 ]
Pritchett, Amy R. [2 ]
Feigh, Karen M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Georgia Inst Technol, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
[2] Penn State Univ, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[3] Georgia Inst Technol, Sch Aerosp Engn, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
基金
美国国家航空航天局;
关键词
computational modeling; function allocation; human robot interaction; methods; AUTOMATION; MODELS; TRUST;
D O I
10.1177/1555343419869484
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
This paper presents a three-phase computational methodology for making informed design decisions when determining the allocation of work and the interaction modes for human-robot teams. The methodology highlights the necessity to consider constraints and dependencies in the work and the work environment as a basis for team design, particularly those dependencies that arise within the dynamics of the team's collective activities. These constraints and dependencies form natural clusters in the team's work, which drive the team's performance and behavior. The proposed methodology employs network visualization and computational simulation of work models to identify dependencies resulting from the interplay of taskwork distributed between teammates, teamwork, and the work environment. Results from these analyses provide insight into not only team efficiency and performance, but also quantified measures of required teamwork, communication, and physical interaction. The paper describes each phase of the methodology in detail and demonstrates each phase with a case study examining the allocation of work in a human-robot team for space operations.
引用
收藏
页码:221 / 241
页数:21
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1996, Cognition in the wild
[2]  
Ashoori M., 2010, P 54 ANN M HUMAN FAC, P274, DOI DOI 10.1177/154193121005400402
[3]   Team Cognitive Work Analysis: Structure and Control Tasks [J].
Ashoori, Maryam ;
Burns, Catherine .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE ENGINEERING AND DECISION MAKING, 2013, 7 (02) :123-140
[4]   Human-automated judge learning: A methodology for examining human interaction with information analysis automation [J].
Bass, Ellen J. ;
Pritchett, Amy R. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS PART A-SYSTEMS AND HUMANS, 2008, 38 (04) :759-776
[5]  
Bisantz A., 2007, Reviews of human factors and ergonomics, V3, P1, DOI [10.1518/155723408X299825, DOI 10.1518/155723408X299825]
[6]  
Bualat M., 2015, AIAA SPACE 2015 C EX
[7]  
Burns C., 2009, P 53 ANN M HUMAN FAC, P314, DOI [DOI 10.1177/154193120905300432, 10.1177/154193120905300432]
[8]  
Christoffersen K, 2002, ADV HUM PER, V2, P1, DOI 10.1016/S1479-3601(02)02003-9
[9]   MABA-MABA or Abracadabra? Progress on Human–Automation Co-ordination [J].
S. W. A. Dekker ;
D. D. Woods .
Cognition, Technology & Work, 2002, 4 (4) :240-244
[10]  
Diftler M. A., 2011, IEEE INT C ROB AUT S