Selective attention, working memory, and animal intelligence

被引:62
作者
Matzel, Louis D. [1 ]
Kolata, Stefan [1 ]
机构
[1] Rutgers State Univ, Dept Psychol, Program Behav Neurosci, Piscataway, NJ 08854 USA
关键词
General intelligence; Fluid intelligence; Learning; Selective attention; Working memory; Short-term memory; Aging; Transgenics; Prefrontal cortex; Mice; Humans; GENERAL LEARNING-ABILITY; HETEROGENEOUS STOCK MICE; SHORT-TERM-MEMORY; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; FLUID INTELLIGENCE; STRESS REACTIVITY; CAPACITY; MAINTENANCE; EXPLORATION; MECHANISMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.07.002
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Accumulating evidence indicates that the storage and processing capabilities of the human working memory system co-vary with individuals' performance on a wide range of cognitive tasks. The ubiquitous nature of this relationship suggests that variations in these processes may underlie individual differences in intelligence. Here we briefly review relevant data which supports this view. Furthermore, we emphasize an emerging literature describing a trait in genetically heterogeneous mice that is quantitatively and qualitatively analogous to general intelligence (g) in humans. As in humans, this animal analog of g co-varies with individual differences in both storage and processing components of the working memory system. Absent some of the complications associated with work with human subjects (e.g., phonological processing), this work with laboratory animals has provided an opportunity to assess otherwise intractable hypotheses. For instance, it has been possible in animals to manipulate individual aspects of the working memory system (e.g., selective attention), and to observe causal relationships between these variables and the expression of general cognitive abilities. This work with laboratory animals has coincided with human imaging studies (briefly reviewed here) which suggest that common brain structures (e.g., prefrontal cortex) mediate the efficacy of selective attention and the performance of individuals on intelligence test batteries. In total, this evidence suggests an evolutionary conservation of the processes that co-vary with and/or regulate "intelligence" and provides a framework for promoting these abilities in both young and old animals. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:23 / 30
页数:8
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]  
Ackerman P.L., 2005, COGNITION INTELLIGEN, P142
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1998, IQ HUMAN INTELLIGENC
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1998, The g factor
[4]   Overlapping mechanisms of attention and spatial working memory [J].
Awh, E ;
Jonides, J .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2001, 5 (03) :119-126
[5]   Working memory: Looking back and looking forward [J].
Baddeley, A .
NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE, 2003, 4 (10) :829-839
[6]  
Baddeley AD., 1974, PSYCHOL LEARN MOTIV, V8, P47, DOI [DOI 10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60452-1, 10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60452-1]
[7]  
Baddeley AD., 1999, Working memory: The multiple-component model
[8]   What kind of attention modulates the Stroop effect? [J].
Besner, D ;
Stolz, JA .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 1999, 6 (01) :99-104
[9]   Of mice and mentality [J].
Blinkhorn, S .
NATURE, 2003, 424 (6952) :1004-1005
[10]   Temporal dynamics of brain activation during a working memory task [J].
Cohen, JD ;
Perlstein, WM ;
Braver, TS ;
Nystrom, LE ;
Noll, DC ;
Jonides, J ;
Smith, EE .
NATURE, 1997, 386 (6625) :604-608