Which management measures lead to better performance of China's protected areas in reducing forest loss?

被引:34
作者
Feng, Chunting [1 ,2 ]
Cao, Ming [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Wei [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Hao [3 ]
Liu, Fangzheng [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Libo [1 ,2 ]
Du, Jinhong [1 ,2 ]
Zhou, Yue [1 ,2 ]
Huang, Wenjie [1 ,2 ]
Li, Junsheng [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Res Inst Environm Sci, State Key Lab Environm Criteria & Risk Assessment, State Environm Protect Key Lab Reg Ecoproc & Func, Beijing 100012, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Res Inst Environm Sci, Biodivers Res Ctr, Beijing 100012, Peoples R China
[3] Peking Univ, Sch Life Sci, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Protected areas; Reducing deforestation; Funding; Scientific research; Propensity score matching;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142895
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Protected areas (PAs) are considered essential for biodiversity conservation, and concerns about the effectiveness of PAs in terms of reducing deforestation are growing. However, few studies have identified the management measures that best reduce deforestation within existing PAs. Here, we carried out 10-year (from 2007 to 2016) field surveys and obtained a database of 10 management measures of 227 PAs mainly protecting forest ecosystems in China. We examined the contributions of the above 10 management measures in relation to the effectiveness of 227 PAs in reducing deforestation. Our results indicated that 52.68% of PAs had positive effects related to reducing deforestation (E > 0, P < 0.05). while 16.52% of PAs had negative effects (E <0, P < 0.05). The most important management measures affecting the effectiveness of PAs in reducing deforestation were funding, infrastructure, and scientific research and monitoring. Thus, our study provides evidence indicating that improved funding and scientific research benefit the effectiveness of PAs. The findings have global implications for guiding PAs to take explicit measures to improve the outcomes of biodiversity conservation. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Weighing the benefits of expanding protected areas versus managing existing ones [J].
Adams, Vanessa M. ;
Iacona, Gwenllian D. ;
Possingham, Hugh P. .
NATURE SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 2 (05) :404-411
[2]   Measuring the effectiveness of protected area networks in reducing deforestation [J].
Andam, Kwaw S. ;
Ferraro, Paul J. ;
Pfaff, Alexander ;
Sanchez-Azofeifa, G. Arturo ;
Robalino, Juan A. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2008, 105 (42) :16089-16094
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Protected Planet Report 2014
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2012, SCIENCE, DOI DOI 10.1126/science.1215904
[5]   Monitoring and Assessment of Protected Areas' Management Capacities in the Republic of Serbia [J].
Banjac, Nikola ;
Maksimovic, Rado ;
Dragas, Katarina ;
Ivetic, Jelena .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (03)
[6]   Paper park performance: Mexico's natural protected areas in the 1990s [J].
Blackman, Allen ;
Pfaff, Alexander ;
Robalino, Juan .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2015, 31 :50-61
[7]   Protected Area Effectiveness in Reducing Conversion in a Rapidly Vanishing Ecosystem: The Brazilian Cerrado [J].
Carranza, Tharsila ;
Balmford, Andrew ;
Kapos, Valerie ;
Manica, Andrea .
CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2014, 7 (03) :216-223
[8]   Impacts of Protected Areas on Local Livelihoods in Cambodia [J].
Clements, Tom ;
Suon, Seng ;
Wilkie, David S. ;
Milner-Gulland, E. J. .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2014, 64 :S125-S134
[9]   Deforestation in Colombian protected areas increased during post-conflict periods [J].
Clerici, N. ;
Armenteras, D. ;
Kareiva, P. ;
Botero, R. ;
Ramirez-Delgado, J. P. ;
Forero-Medina, G. ;
Ochoa, J. ;
Pedraza, C. ;
Schneider, L. ;
Lora, C. ;
Gomez, C. ;
Linares, M. ;
Hirashiki, C. ;
Biggs, D. .
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)
[10]  
Coad L., 2015, MEAS IMP PROT AR MAN