The reliability and sensitivity to change of acoustic measures of voice quality

被引:101
作者
Carding, PN
Steen, IN
Webb, A
Mackenzie, K
Deary, IJ
Wilson, JA
机构
[1] Newcastle Univ, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 7RU, Tyne & Wear, England
[2] Newcastle Univ, Ctr Hlth Serv Res, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 7RU, Tyne & Wear, England
[3] Glasgow Royal Infirm, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Glasgow G4 0SF, Lanark, Scotland
[4] Univ Edinburgh, Dept Psychol, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
关键词
voice disorders; dysphonia; voice quality; acoustic measurement; perturbation;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2273.2004.00846.x
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
This study aimed to evaluate the reliability and sensitivity to change of three commonly used acoustic parameters as measured by the Multi-Dimensional Voice Programme (MDVP); jitter, shimmer and noise-to-harmonic ratio. A total of 231 subjects' voices were recorded and analysed. The sample comprised 145 dysphonic patients who received intervention (surgery or voice therapy), 36 dysphonic patients who received no intervention, and 50 non-dysphonic (normal) subjects. All voices were recorded and analysed on two occasions (before and after treatment, or test-retest assessment) using a standard procedure. These data were analysed using standard psychometric procedures for assessing reliability and responsiveness. The acoustic analysis measures demonstrated poor to moderate reliability and effect size with respect to their sensitivity to change. Caution should be exercised in the injudicious use of computer-based acoustic analysis systems as an isolated measure of voice outcome in any clinical trial of interventions aimed at improving voice quality.
引用
收藏
页码:538 / 544
页数:7
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Post-thyroidectomy superior laryngeal nerve injury [J].
Aluffi, P ;
Policarpo, M ;
Cherovac, C ;
Olina, M ;
Dosdegani, R ;
Pia, F .
EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2001, 258 (09) :451-454
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2000, Evaluating voice therapy: Measuring the effectiveness of treatment
[3]   Objective evaluation of the quality of voice following radiation therapy for T-1 glottic cancer [J].
Aref, A ;
Dworkin, J ;
Devi, S ;
Denton, L ;
Fontanesi, J .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1997, 45 (02) :149-153
[4]   Inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate improves acoustic measures of voice in patients with asthma [J].
Balter, MS ;
Adams, SG ;
Chapman, KR .
CHEST, 2001, 120 (06) :1829-1834
[5]   Acoustic analysis of voice quality with or without false vocal fold displacement after cordectomy [J].
Bertino, G ;
Bellomo, A ;
Ferrero, FE ;
Ferlito, A .
JOURNAL OF VOICE, 2001, 15 (01) :131-140
[6]  
Bland M., 2000, INTRO MED STAT
[7]   Intrasubject variability of objective voice measures [J].
Bough, ID ;
Heuer, RJ ;
Sataloff, RT ;
Hills, JR ;
Cater, JR .
JOURNAL OF VOICE, 1996, 10 (02) :166-174
[8]   Acoustic analysis of pathological voices [J].
Boyanov, B ;
Hadjitodorov, S .
IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY MAGAZINE, 1997, 16 (04) :74-82
[9]   Dysphonia and delayed food allergy: A provocation/neutralization study with strobovideolaryngoscopy [J].
Dixon, HS .
OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 1999, 121 (04) :418-429
[10]  
Dunn G., 1989, Design and analysis of reliability studies: the statistical evaluation of measurement errors