Vibration Alert to the Brain: Evoked and Induced MEG Responses to High-Frequency Vibrotactile Stimuli on the Index Finger of Dominant and Non-dominant Hand

被引:7
作者
Kim, Min-Young [1 ]
Kwon, Hyukchan [1 ]
Yang, Tae-Heon [2 ]
Kim, Kiwoong [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Korea Res Inst Stand & Sci, Quantum Technol, Daejeon, South Korea
[2] Korea Natl Univ Transportat, Dept Elect Engn, Chungju Si, South Korea
[3] Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Med Phys, Daejeon, South Korea
[4] Chungbuk Natl Univ, Dept Phys, Cheongju, South Korea
关键词
magnetoencephalography (MEG); vibrotactile stimulation; time-locked responses; alpha suppression; beta suppression; SECONDARY SOMATOSENSORY CORTEX; MAGNETIC-FIELDS; CORTICAL OSCILLATIONS; TACTILE STIMULATION; GLABROUS SKIN; HUMANS; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; SYNCHRONIZATION; ACTIVATION; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.3389/fnhum.2020.576082
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Background: In recent years, vibrotactile haptic feedback technology has been widely used for user interfaces in the mobile devices. Although functional neuroimaging studies have investigated human brain responses to different types of tactile inputs, the neural mechanisms underlying high-frequency vibrotactile perception are still relatively unknown. Our aim was to investigate neuromagnetic brain responses to high-frequency vibrotactile stimulation, using magnetoencephalography (MEG). Methods: We measured 152-channel whole-head MEG in 30 healthy, right-handed volunteers (aged 20-28 years, 15 females). A total of 300 vibrotactile stimuli were presented at the tip of either the left index finger or the right index finger in two separate sessions. Sinusoidal vibrations at 150 Hz for 200 ms were generated with random inter-stimulus intervals between 1.6 and 2.4 s. Both time-locked analysis and time-frequency analysis were performed to identify peak responses and oscillatory modulations elicited by high-frequency vibrations. The significance of the evoked and induced responses for dominant and non-dominant hand stimulation conditions was statistically tested, respectively. The difference in responses between stimulation conditions was also statistically evaluated. Results: Prominent peak responses were observed at 56 ms (M50) and at 100 ms (M100) for both stimulation conditions. The M50 response revealed clear dipolar field patterns in the contralateral side with significant cortical activations in the contralateral primary sensorimotor area, whereas the M100 response was not as prominent as the M50. Vibrotactile stimulation induced significant suppression of both alpha (8-12 Hz) and beta (20-30 Hz) band activity during the mid-latency period (0.2-0.4 s), primarily in sensorimotor areas contralateral to the stimulation side. In addition, a significant alpha enhancement effect in posterior regions was accompanied with alpha suppressions in sensorimotor regions. The alpha suppression was observed in a broader distribution of cortical areas for the non-dominant hand stimulation. Conclusion: Our data demonstrate that high-frequency tactile vibrations, which is known to primarily activate Pacinian corpuscles, elicit somatosensory M50 and M100 responses in the evoked fields and induce modulations of alpha and beta band oscillations during mid-latency periods. Our study is also consistent with that the primary sensorimotor area is significantly involved in the processing of high-frequency vibrotactile information with contralateral dominance.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 103 条
[1]  
Alahakone AU, 2009, IEEE ASME INT C ADV, P1141
[2]   Somatosensory responses to nothing: An MEG study of expectations during omission of tactile stimulations [J].
Andersen, Lau M. ;
Lundqvist, Daniel .
NEUROIMAGE, 2019, 184 :78-89
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2019, FRONT NEUROSCI SWITZ
[4]   Magnetoencephalography for brain electrophysiology and imaging [J].
Baillet, Sylvain .
NATURE NEUROSCIENCE, 2017, 20 (03) :327-339
[5]   Tactile spatial attention enhances gamma-band activity in somatosensory cortex and reduces low-frequency activity in parieto-occipital areas [J].
Bauer, M ;
Oostenveld, R ;
Peeters, M ;
Fries, P .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2006, 26 (02) :490-501
[6]   Tactile intensity and population codes [J].
Bensmaia, Sliman J. .
BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2008, 190 (02) :165-173
[7]   CUTANEOUS SENSORY RECEPTORS [J].
BIRDER, LA ;
PERL, ER .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1994, 11 (06) :534-552
[8]   4 CHANNELS MEDIATE THE MECHANICAL ASPECTS OF TOUCH [J].
BOLANOWSKI, SJ ;
GESCHEIDER, GA ;
VERRILLO, RT ;
CHECKOSKY, CM .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1988, 84 (05) :1680-1694
[9]   Convergence across Tactile Afferent Types in Primary and Secondary Somatosensory Cortices [J].
Carter, Andrew W. ;
Chen, Spencer C. ;
Lovell, Nigel H. ;
Vickery, Richard M. ;
Morley, John W. .
PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (09)
[10]   Somatosensory processing in neurodevelopmental disorders [J].
Cascio, Carissa J. .
JOURNAL OF NEURODEVELOPMENTAL DISORDERS, 2010, 2 (02) :62-69