Novel robotic catheter remote control system: Feasibility and safety of transseptal puncture and endocardial catheter navigation

被引:120
作者
Saliba, Walid [1 ]
Cummings, Jennifer E. [1 ]
Oh, Seil [1 ]
Zhang, Youhua [1 ]
Mazgalev, Todor N. [1 ]
Schweikert, Robert A. [1 ]
Burkhardt, J. David [1 ]
Natale, Andrea [1 ]
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Dept Cardiovasc Med, Sect Cardiac Electrophysiol & Pacing, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
关键词
ablation; mapping; catheters;
D O I
10.1111/j.1540-8167.2006.00556.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: The aims of this study were to demonstrate the safety and the feasibility of the robotic catheter remote control system (CCS) in endocardial navigation in all cardiac chambers, as well as facilitation of the transseptal puncture. Background: CCS has been developed to facilitate control and precise positioning of catheters within the cardiovascular system. Methods: CCS consists of a remote catheter manipulator, a set up joint, a physician workstation, and a steerable guide catheter (SGC) and sheath. A conventional 4-mm tip catheter was inserted through the SGC to perform mapping of five predefined targets in each cardiac chamber. Seven mongrel dogs were used in this study. Intracardiac echocardiography and three-dimensional (3-D) electroanatomical mapping were integrated with CCS to facilitate catheter manipulation and to guide transseptal puncture. The time to complete the transseptal puncture and the time to complete access to the predefined targets in each cardiac chamber were measured. Gross and microscopic examinations of the accessed and ablation sites were performed to evaluate safety. Results: Transseptal puncture was performed successfully in all animals with a mean time of 7 +/- 3 minutes. Procedure times to access the five targets in the right atrium, right ventricle, left atrium, and left ventricle were 5.6 +/- 1.7, 4.6 +/- 1.5, 13.5 +/- 11.0, 7.0 +/- 2.9 minutes, respectively. There were no intracardiac damages associated with catheter manipulation noted in the excised hearts. Conclusions: Endocardial catheter navigation and mapping using the robotic catheter remote control is safe and feasible. Moreover, the CCS could be used to perform transseptal puncture and left atrial instrumentation.
引用
收藏
页码:1102 / 1105
页数:4
相关论文
共 6 条
  • [1] Early experience with a computerized robotically controlled catheter system
    Al-Ahmad, A
    Grossman, JD
    Wang, PJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2005, 12 (03) : 199 - 202
  • [2] Initial experience with remote catheter ablation using a novel magnetic navigation system -: Magnetic remote catheter ablation
    Ernst, S
    Ouyang, FF
    Linder, C
    Hertting, K
    Stahl, F
    Chun, J
    Hachiya, H
    Bänsch, D
    Antz, M
    Kuck, KH
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2004, 109 (12) : 1472 - 1475
  • [3] Novel, magnetically guided catheter for endocardial mapping and radiofrequency catheter ablation
    Faddis, MN
    Blume, W
    Finney, J
    Hall, A
    Rauch, J
    Sell, J
    Bae, KT
    Talcott, M
    Lindsay, B
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2002, 106 (23) : 2980 - 2985
  • [4] Magnetic guidance system for cardiac electrophysiology - A prospective trial of safety and efficacy in humans
    Faddis, MN
    Chen, J
    Osborn, J
    Talcott, M
    Cain, ME
    Lindsay, BD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2003, 42 (11) : 1952 - 1958
  • [5] Drug therapy - Radio-frequency ablation as treatment for cardiac arrhythmias
    Morady, F
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1999, 340 (07) : 534 - 544
  • [6] Catheter ablation for cardiac arrhythmias
    Wellens, HJJ
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2004, 351 (12) : 1172 - 1174