Integrating patient values and preferences in healthcare: a systematic review of qualitative evidence

被引:28
作者
Tringale, Michael [1 ]
Stephen, Genia [1 ]
Boylan, Anne-Marie [2 ]
Heneghan, Carl [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Kellogg Coll, Oxford, England
[2] Univ Oxford, Nuffield Dept Primary Care Hlth Sci, Oxford, England
[3] Univ Oxford, Primary Hlth Care, Oxford, England
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2022年 / 12卷 / 11期
关键词
SHARED DECISION-MAKING; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; CLINICAL-PRACTICE; CANCER-PATIENTS; CENTERED CARE; COMMUNICATION; BARRIERS; SATISFACTION; TAXONOMY; DOCTORS;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067268
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives To identify and thematically analyse how healthcare professionals (HCPs) integrate patient values and preferences (`values integration') in primary care for adults with non-communicable diseases (NCDs). Design Systematic review and meta-aggregation methods were used for extraction, synthesis and analysis of qualitative evidence. Data sources Relevant records were sourced using keywords to search 12 databases (ASSIA, CINAHL, DARE, EMBASE, ERIC, Google Scholar, GreyLit, Ovid-MEDLINE, PsycINFO, PubMed-MEDLINE, Scopus and Web of Science). Eligibility criteria Records needed to be published between 2000 and 2020 and report qualitative methods and findings in English involving HCP participants regarding primary care for adult patients. Data extraction and synthesis Relevant data including participant quotations, authors' observations, interpretations and conclusions were extracted, synthesised and analysed in a phased approach using a modified version of the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Data Extraction Tool, as well as EPPI Reviewer and NVivo software. The JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research was used to assess methodological quality of included records. Results Thirty--one records involving >1032 HCP participants and 1823 HCP-patient encounters were reviewed. Findings included 143 approaches to values integration in clinical care, thematically analysed and synthesised into four themes: (1) approaches of concern; (2) approaches of competence; (3) approaches of communication and (4) approaches of congruence. Confidence in the quality of included records was deemed high. Conclusions HCPs incorporate patient values and preferences in healthcare through a variety of approaches including showing concern for the patient as a person, demonstrating competence at managing diseases, communicating with patients as partners and tailoring, adjusting and balancing overall care. Themes in this review provide a novel framework for understanding and addressing values integration in clinical care and provide useful insights for policymakers, educators and practitioners.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] What do patient values and preferences mean? A taxonomy based on a systematic review of qualitative papers
    Bastemeijer, Carla M.
    Voogt, Lennard
    van Ewijk, Johannes P.
    Hazelzet, Jan A.
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2017, 100 (05) : 871 - 881
  • [2] Making patient values visible in healthcare: a systematic review of tools to assess patient treatment priorities and preferences in the context of multimorbidity
    Mangin, Dee
    Stephen, Gaibrie
    Bismah, Verdah
    Risdon, Cathy
    BMJ OPEN, 2016, 6 (06):
  • [3] Integrating evidence on patient preferences in healthcare policy decisions: protocol of the patient-VIP study
    Carmen D Dirksen
    Cecile MA Utens
    Manuela A Joore
    Teus A van Barneveld
    Bert Boer
    Dunja HH Dreesens
    Hans van Laarhoven
    Cees Smit
    Anne M Stiggelbout
    Trudy van der Weijden
    Implementation Science, 8
  • [4] Integrating evidence on patient preferences in healthcare policy decisions: protocol of the patient-VIP study
    Dirksen, Carmen D.
    Utens, Cecile M. A.
    Joore, Manuela A.
    van Barneveld, Teus A.
    Boer, Bert
    Dreesens, Dunja H. H.
    van Laarhoven, Hans
    Smit, Cees
    Stiggelbout, Anne M.
    van der Weijden, Trudy
    IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2013, 8
  • [5] A Systematic Review of Patient Preferences, Expectations, and Values for the Management and Treatment of Hypertension
    Xu, Xianpeng
    Guo, Tao
    Liu, Zifeng
    Chen, Peng
    Zhang, Ying
    Ji, Qingjie
    Xie, Hui
    PATIENT PREFERENCE AND ADHERENCE, 2022, 16 : 2867 - 2876
  • [6] Patient Preferences and Values in Decision Making for Migraines: A Systematic Literature Review
    Xu, Xianpeng
    Ji, Qingjie
    Shen, Min
    PAIN RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT, 2021, 2021
  • [8] Patient values and preferences on valve replacement for aortic stenosis: a systematic review
    Heen, Anja Fog
    Lytvyn, Lyubov
    Shapiro, Michael
    Guyatt, Gordon Henry
    Siemieniuk, Reed Alexander Cunningham
    Zhang, Yuan
    Manja, Veena
    Vandvik, Per Olav
    Agoritsas, Thomas
    HEART, 2021, 107 (16) : 1289 - 1295
  • [9] Seasonal influenza vaccination of healthcare workers: systematic review of qualitative evidence
    Lorenc, Theo
    Marshall, David
    Wright, Kath
    Sutcliffe, Katy
    Sowden, Amanda
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2017, 17
  • [10] Patient Preferences for Discussing Life Expectancy: a Systematic Review
    Bjork, Emma
    Thompson, Wade
    Ryg, Jesper
    Gaardboe, Ove
    Jorgensen, Trine Lembrecht
    Lundby, Carina
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2021, 36 (10) : 3136 - 3147