Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Fecal Microbiota Transplant in Active Ulcerative Colitis

被引:118
作者
Ding, Xiao [1 ,2 ]
Li, Qianqian [1 ]
Li, Pan [1 ,3 ]
Zhang, Ting [1 ]
Cui, Bota [1 ,3 ]
Ji, Guozhong [1 ,3 ]
Lu, Xiang [2 ]
Zhang, Faming [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Med Univ, Med Ctr Digest Dis, Affiliated Hosp 2, 121 Jiang Jia Yuan, Nanjing 210011, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Med Univ, Sir Run Run Hosp, Dept Geriatr, 109 Longmian Ave, Nanjing 211166, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[3] Nanjing Med Univ, Key Lab Holist Integrat Enterol, Nanjing 210011, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
INFLAMMATORY-BOWEL-DISEASE; INDUCTION THERAPY; GUT MICROBIOME; REMISSION; CHALLENGES; STRATEGY; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1007/s40264-019-00809-2
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Introduction and objective The therapeutic role of fecal microbiota transplantation in ulcerative colitis varies across different reports. This study aims to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of a strategy called step-up fecal microbiota transplantation for ulcerative colitis. Methods Two clinical trials (NCT01790061, NCT02560727) for moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (Mayo score range 6-12) were performed from November 2012 to July 2017. Both studies were pooled for analysis on the safety and efficacy of fecal microbiota transplantation in patients with ulcerative colitis over a 1-year follow-up. The step-up fecal microbiota transplantation strategy included step 1: single fecal microbiota transplantation; step 2: two or more fecal microbiota transplantations; and step 3: fecal microbiota transplantations followed by immunosuppressants. Long-term clinical efficacy and adverse events were assessed, and multiple factors related to fecal microbiota transplantation were evaluated. Results Of 134 eligible patients in this real-word study, 81.3% (109/134) were included for analysis. The follow-up ranged from 1 to 5 years. Fecal microbiota transplantation-related adverse events were observed in 17.4% (43/247) of fecal microbiota transplantation procedures including one serious adverse event (myasthenia gravis) and 56 non-serious adverse events. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that both the method of preparation of microbiota from stool using the automatic system and the delivery method of colonic transendoscopic enteral tubing were associated with a lower rate of fecal microbiota transplantation-related adverse events (p=0.023, p=0.017, respectively). In total, 74.3% (81/109) and 51.4% (56/109) of patients achieved clinical response at 1 month and 3 months after step-up fecal microbiota transplantation, respectively. Conclusions Fecal microbiota transplantation should be a safe and promising therapy for ulcerative colitis. The improved fecal microbiota preparation and colonic transendoscopic enteral tubing might reduce the rate of adverse events in ulcerative colitis.
引用
收藏
页码:869 / 880
页数:12
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] Temporal Bacterial Community Dynamics Vary Among Ulcerative Colitis Patients After Fecal Microbiota Transplantation
    Angelberger, Sieglinde
    Reinisch, Walter
    Makristathis, Athanasios
    Lichtenberger, Cornelia
    Dejaco, Clemens
    Papay, Pavol
    Novacek, Gottfried
    Trauner, Michael
    Loy, Alexander
    Erry, David B.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2013, 108 (10) : 1620 - 1630
  • [2] Vedolizumab induction therapy for inflammatory bowel disease in clinical practice - a nationwide consecutive German cohort study
    Baumgart, D. C.
    Bokemeyer, B.
    Drabik, A.
    Stallmach, A.
    Schreiber, S.
    [J]. ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2016, 43 (10) : 1090 - 1102
  • [3] BENNET JD, 1989, LANCET, V1, P164
  • [4] Therapeutic faecal microbiota transplantation: current status and future developments
    Borody, Thomas J.
    Brandt, Lawrence J.
    Paramsothy, Sudarshan
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 30 (01) : 97 - 105
  • [5] Profiling Living Bacteria Informs Preparation of Fecal Microbiota Transplantations
    Chu, Nathaniel D.
    Smith, Mark B.
    Perrotta, Allison R.
    Kassam, Zain
    Alm, Eric J.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (01):
  • [6] Effect of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation on 8-Week Remission in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Costello, Samuel P.
    Hughes, Patrick A.
    Waters, Oliver
    Bryant, Robert, V
    Vincent, Andrew D.
    Blatchford, Paul
    Katsikeros, Rosa
    Makanyanga, Jesica
    Campaniello, Melissa A.
    Mavrangelos, Chris
    Rosewarne, Carly P.
    Bickley, Chelsea
    Peters, Cian
    Schoeman, Mark N.
    Conlon, Michael A.
    Roberts-Thomson, Ian C.
    Andrews, Jane M.
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2019, 321 (02): : 156 - 164
  • [7] Step-up fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) strategy
    Cui, Bota
    Li, Pan
    Xu, Lijuan
    Peng, Zhaoyuan
    Xiang, Jie
    He, Zhi
    Zhang, Ting
    Ji, Guozhong
    Nie, Yongzhan
    Wu, Kaichun
    Fan, Daiming
    Zhang, Faming
    [J]. GUT MICROBES, 2016, 7 (04) : 323 - 328
  • [8] Step-up fecal microbiota transplantation strategy: a pilot study for steroid-dependent ulcerative colitis
    Cui, Bota
    Li, Pan
    Xu, Lijuan
    Zhao, Youquan
    Wang, Huiquan
    Peng, Zhaoyuan
    Xu, Hai'e
    Xiang, Jie
    He, Zhi
    Zhang, Ting
    Nie, Yongzhan
    Wu, Kaichun
    Fan, Daiming
    Ji, Guozhong
    Zhang, Faming
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2015, 13
  • [9] Fecal microbiota transplantation through mid-gut for refractory Crohn's disease: Safety, feasibility, and efficacy trial results
    Cui, Bota
    Feng, Qiang
    Wang, Honggang
    Wang, Min
    Peng, Zhaoyuan
    Li, Pan
    Huang, Guangming
    Liu, Zheng
    Wu, Ping
    Fan, Zhining
    Ji, Guozhong
    Wang, Xin
    Wu, Kaichun
    Fan, Daiming
    Zhang, Faming
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2015, 30 (01) : 51 - 58
  • [10] Why is it so difficult to evaluate faecal microbiota transplantation as a treatment for ulcerative colitis?
    Fairhurst, Natalie Grace
    Travis, Simon P. L.
    [J]. INTESTINAL RESEARCH, 2018, 16 (02) : 209 - 215