Failure rates in nonlatex surgical gloves

被引:24
作者
Korniewicz, DM
Garzon, L
Seltzer, J
Feinleib, M
机构
[1] Univ Miami, Sch Nursing, Res & Doctoral Program, Sch Med,Dept Surg & Epidemiol, Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA
[2] Old Dominion Univ, Sch Nursing, Norfolk, VA USA
[3] Univ Maryland, Sch Nursing, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
[4] Univ Maryland, Med Ctr, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
[5] Johns Hopkins Univ, Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Baltimore, MD USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.ajic.2003.12.005
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: The purpose of this study was to compare the frequency of glove defects for nonlatex surgical gloves while surgeons performed routine surgery and to evaluate surgeons' satisfaction with nonlatex sterile gloves. Methods: Two brands of latex gloves and 6 brands of nonlatex gloves were tested. Gloves were collected at the end of each surgical procedure and tested for visual defects and barrier integrity using an automated calibrated water test machine consistent with FDA's recommended standards. A total of 6386 gloves used by 101 surgeons and 164 residents representing 15 surgical services were included in the analysis. Results: Higher after-use defect rates occurred in nonlatex surgical gloves than in latex gloves. Higher times of use were related to higher defect rates for some surgical specialties, and both surgeons and residents were less satisfied with nonlatex surgical gloves. Conclusion: Intact latex and nonlatex surgical gloves provide adequate barrier protection. Nonlatex surgical gloves have higher failure rates and lower user satisfaction than latex gloves do. Both nonlatex and latex gloves should be changed after 2 to 3 hours of use because the barrier of either type of glove becomes compromised with extended use.
引用
收藏
页码:268 / 273
页数:6
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   ANATOMY OF A DEFECTIVE BARRIER - SEQUENTIAL GLOVE LEAK DETECTION IN A SURGICAL AND DENTAL ENVIRONMENT [J].
ALBIN, MS ;
BUNEGIN, L ;
DUKE, ES ;
RITTER, RR ;
PAGE, CP .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1992, 20 (02) :170-184
[2]  
[Anonymous], B AM COLL SURG
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1999, ERR HUMAN BUILDING S
[4]   The permeability of dental procedure and examination gloves by an alcohol based disinfectant [J].
Baumann, MA ;
Rath, B ;
Fischer, JH ;
Iffland, R .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 2000, 16 (02) :139-144
[5]   Risk and management of blood-borne infections in health care workers [J].
Beltrami, EM ;
Williams, IT ;
Shapiro, CN ;
Chamberland, ME .
CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY REVIEWS, 2000, 13 (03) :385-+
[6]  
BENNETT B, 1991, OBSTET GYNECOL, V78, P1019
[7]  
Centers for Disease Control, 1988, MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, V37, P377
[8]   NEW ADVANCES IN ELECTRONIC DEVICES FOR HOLE DETECTION [J].
COX, MJ ;
BROMBERG, WJ ;
ZURA, RD ;
FORESMAN, PA ;
MORGAN, RG ;
EDLICH, RF .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED BIOMATERIALS, 1994, 5 (03) :257-264
[9]   Improving infection control in general practice [J].
Farrow, SC ;
Zeuner, D ;
Hall, C .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY FOR THE PROMOTION OF HEALTH, 1999, 119 (01) :17-22
[10]   Dental surgeons with natural rubber latex allergy: a report of 20 cases [J].
Field, EA .
OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE-OXFORD, 1999, 49 (02) :103-107