Transcranial random noise stimulation is more effective than transcranial direct current stimulation for enhancing working memory in healthy individuals: Behavioural and electrophysiological evidence

被引:55
|
作者
Murphy, O. W. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
Hoy, K. E. [5 ,6 ]
Wong, D. [3 ,4 ,7 ]
Bailey, N. W. [5 ,6 ]
Fitzgerald, P. B. [5 ,6 ]
Segrave, R. A. [8 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Alfred, Cent Clin Sch, Monash Alfred Psychiat Res Ctr, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Monash Univ, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Monash Univ, Sch Psychol Sci, Monash Inst Cognit & Clin Neurosci, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] Monash Univ, Monash Biomed Imaging, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[5] Epworth Healthcare, Epworth Ctr Innovat Mental Hlth, Camberwell, Vic, Australia
[6] Monash Univ, Cent Clin Sch, Dept Psychiat, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[7] La Trobe Univ, Sch Psychol & Publ Hlth, Bundoora, Vic, Australia
[8] Monash Univ, Brain & Mental Hlth Res Hub, Sch Psychol Sci, Clayton, Vic, Australia
[9] Monash Univ, Monash Biomed Imaging, Monash Inst Cognit & Clin Neurosci, Clayton, Vic, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
tDCS; tRNS; DLPFC; EEG; Working memory; DORSOLATERAL PREFRONTAL CORTEX; NONINVASIVE BRAIN-STIMULATION; SERIAL-ADDITION TASK; OSCILLATIONS; GAMMA; TDCS; ENHANCEMENT; MAINTENANCE; COGNITION; LOAD;
D O I
10.1016/j.brs.2020.07.001
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been shown to improve working memory (WM) performance in healthy individuals, however effects tend to be modest and variable. Transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) can be delivered with a direct-current offset (DC-offset) to induce equal or even greater effects on cortical excitability than tDCS. To-date, no research has directly compared the effects of these techniques on WM performance or underlying neurophysiological activity. Objective: To compare the effects of anodal tDCS, tRNS + DC-offset, or sham stimulation over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) on WM performance and task-related EEG oscillatory activity in healthy adults. Methods: Using a between-subjects design, 49 participants were allocated to receive either anodal tDCS (N = 16), high-frequency tRNS + DC-offset (N = 16), or sham stimulation (N = 17) to the left DLPFC. Changes in WM performance were assessed using the Sternberg WM task completed before and 5- and 25-min post-stimulation. Event-related synchronisation/desynchronisation (ERS/ERD) of oscillatory activity was analysed from EEG recorded during WM encoding and maintenance. Results: tRNS induced more pronounced and consistent enhancements in WM accuracy when compared to both tDCS and sham stimulation. Improvements in WM performance following tRNS were accompanied by increased theta ERS and diminished gamma ERD during WM encoding, which were significantly greater than those observed following anodal tDCS or sham stimulation. Conclusions: These findings demonstrate the potential of tRNS + DC-offset to modulate cognitive and electrophysiological measures of WM and raise the possibility that tRNS + DC-offset may be more effective and reliable than tDCS for enhancing WM performance in healthy individuals. (C) 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1370 / 1380
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Augmentation of working memory training by transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)
    Ruf, Steffen Philipp
    Fallgatter, Andreas J.
    Plewnia, Christian
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2017, 7
  • [22] Uncertainty and Promise: the Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Working Memory
    Jantz T.K.
    Katz B.
    Reuter-Lorenz P.A.
    Current Behavioral Neuroscience Reports, 2016, 3 (2) : 109 - 121
  • [23] A direct comparison of the electrophysiological effects of transcranial direct and alternating current stimulation in healthy subjects
    Kim, Jiheon
    Jang, Kuk-In
    Roh, Daeyoung
    Kim, Hansol
    Kim, Do Hoon
    BRAIN RESEARCH, 2020, 1747
  • [24] Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Modulates Verbal Working Memory
    Boehringer, Andreas
    Macher, Katja
    Dukart, Juergen
    Villringer, Arno
    Pleger, Burkhard
    BRAIN STIMULATION, 2013, 6 (04) : 649 - 653
  • [25] No Evidence for Enhancing Prospective Memory with Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Across Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex
    Ellis, Derek M.
    Veloria, Gianne K. G.
    Arnett, Ciera R.
    Vogel, Anne E.
    Pitaes, Margarida
    Brewer, Gene A.
    JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE ENHANCEMENT, 2020, 4 (03) : 333 - 339
  • [26] The Effects of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Working Memory
    Katsoulaki, Marianna
    Kastrinis, Alexandros
    Tsekoura, Maria
    GENEDIS 2016: GENETICS AND NEURODEGENERATION, 2017, 987 : 283 - 289
  • [27] Transcranial direct current stimulation over the right DLPFC selectively modulates subprocesses in working memory
    Wang, Jiarui
    Tian, Jinhua
    Hao, Renning
    Tian, Lili
    Liu, Qiang
    PEERJ, 2018, 6
  • [28] Behavioural and electrophysiological modulations induced by transcranial direct current stimulation in healthy elderly and Alzheimer's disease patients: A pilot study
    Cespon, J.
    Rodella, C.
    Miniussi, C.
    Pellicciari, M. C.
    CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2019, 130 (11) : 2038 - 2052
  • [29] Improvement of the Working Memory by Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Healthy Older Adults
    Seo, Min-Ho
    Park, Sung-Hee
    Seo, Jeong-Hwan
    Kim, Yun-Hee
    Ko, Myoung-Hwan
    ANNALS OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE-ARM, 2011, 35 (02): : 201 - 206
  • [30] Shaping Memory Accuracy by Left Prefrontal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
    Zwissler, Bastian
    Sperber, Christoph
    Aigeldinger, Sina
    Schindler, Sebastian
    Kissler, Johanna
    Plewnia, Christian
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2014, 34 (11) : 4022 - 4026