Implications for Welfare, Productivity and Sustainability of the Variation in Reported Levels of Mortality for Laying Hen Flocks Kept in Different Housing Systems: A Meta-Analysis of Ten Studies

被引:61
作者
Weeks, Claire A. [1 ]
Lambton, Sarah L. [1 ]
Williams, Adrian G. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bristol, Sch Vet Sci, Bristol BS18 7DU, Avon, England
[2] Cranfield Univ, Sch Energy Environm & Agrifood, Bedford, England
来源
PLOS ONE | 2016年 / 11卷 / 01期
关键词
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS; FEATHER PECKING; MANAGEMENT; FARM; PREVALENCE; END;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0146394
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Data from ten sources comprising 3,851 flocks were modelled to identify variation in levels of mortality in laying hens. The predicted increase with age was curvilinear with significant variation between the seven breed categories. Mortality was higher in loose housing systems than in cages and variable within system, confirming previous reports. Cumulative mortality (CM) was higher in flocks with intact beaks (chi 2 = 6.03; df 1; p = 0.014) than in those with trimmed beaks. Most data were available for free-range systems (2,823 flocks), where producer recorded CM at 60-80 weeks of age averaged 10% but with a range from 0% to 69.3%. Life cycle assessment showed that the main effect of increased levels of hen mortality is to increase the relative contribution of breeding overheads, so increasing environmental burdens per unit of production. Reducing CM to levels currently achieved by the 1st quartile could reduce flock greenhouse gas emissions by as much as 25%. Concurrently this would enhance hen welfare and better meet the expectation of egg consumers. More research to understand the genetic x environment interaction and detailed records of the causes of mortality is required so that improved genotypes can be developed for different systems and different breeds can be better managed within systems.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Productivity and mortality of laying hens in aviaries:: a systematic review
    Aerni, V
    Brinkhof, MWG
    Wechsler, B
    Oester, H
    Fröhlich, E
    [J]. WORLDS POULTRY SCIENCE JOURNAL, 2005, 61 (01) : 130 - 142
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2013, GREENHOUSE GAS EMISS
  • [3] [Anonymous], IS0205 DEFRA
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2006, 140402006 ISO
  • [5] THE WELFARE PROBLEMS OF LAYING HENS IN BATTERY CAGES
    BAXTER, MR
    [J]. VETERINARY RECORD, 1994, 134 (24) : 614 - 619
  • [6] Black H, 2009, 200918 MAF
  • [7] The LayWel project:: welfare implications of changes in production systems for laying hens
    Blokhuis, H. J.
    Van Niekerk, T. Fiks
    Bessei, W.
    Elson, A.
    Guemene, D.
    Kjaer, J. B.
    Levrino, G. A. Maria
    Nicol, C. J.
    Tauson, R.
    Weeks, C. A.
    Van de Weerd, H. A.
    [J]. WORLDS POULTRY SCIENCE JOURNAL, 2007, 63 (01) : 101 - 114
  • [8] Ecological and economic evaluation of Dutch egg production systems
    Dekker, S. E. M.
    de Boer, I. J. M.
    Vermeij, I.
    Aarnink, A. J. A.
    Koerkamp, P. W. G. Groot
    [J]. LIVESTOCK SCIENCE, 2011, 139 (1-2) : 109 - 121
  • [9] Poultry welfare in intensive and extensive production systems
    Elson, H. A.
    [J]. WORLDS POULTRY SCIENCE JOURNAL, 2015, 71 (03) : 449 - 460
  • [10] Cross-sectional study of the prevalence of feather pecking in laying hens in alternative systems and its associations with management and disease
    Green, LE
    Lewis, K
    Kimpton, A
    Nicol, CJ
    [J]. VETERINARY RECORD, 2000, 147 (09) : 233 - 238