Comparison of different multi-objective calibration criteria using a conceptual rainfall-runoff model of flood events

被引:64
作者
Moussa, R. [1 ]
Chahinian, N. [2 ]
机构
[1] INRA, UMR LISAH SupAgro IRD, Lab Etude Interact Entre Sol Agrosyst Hydrosyst, F-34060 Montpellier, France
[2] Univ Montpellier 2, Case Courrier MSE, F-34095 Montpellier 5, France
关键词
MULTICRITERIA OPTIMIZATION; AUTOMATIC CALIBRATION; GLOBAL OPTIMIZATION; HYDROLOGIC-MODELS; CATCHMENT; UNCERTAINTY; EFFICIENT; ALGORITHMS; SIMULATION; STRATEGIES;
D O I
10.5194/hess-13-519-2009
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
A conceptual lumped rainfall-runoff flood event model was developed and applied on the Gardon catchment located in Southern France and various single-objective and multi-objective functions were used for its calibration. The model was calibrated on 15 events and validated on 14 others. The results of both the calibration and validation phases are compared on the basis of their performance with regards to six criteria, three global criteria and three relative criteria representing volume, peakflow, and the root mean square error. The first type of criteria gives more weight to large events whereas the second considers all events to be of equal weight. The results show that the calibrated parameter values are dependent on the type of criteria used. Significant trade-offs are observed between the different objectives: no unique set of parameters is able to satisfy all objectives simultaneously. Instead, the solution to the calibration problem is given by a set of Pareto optimal solutions. From this set of optimal solutions, a balanced aggregated objective function is proposed, as a compromise between up to three objective functions. The single-objective and multi-objective calibration strategies are compared both in terms of parameter variation bounds and simulation quality. The results of this study indicate that two well chosen and non-redundant objective functions are sufficient to calibrate the model and that the use of three objective functions does not necessarily yield different results. The problems of non-uniqueness in model calibration, and the choice of the adequate objective functions for flood event models, emphasise the importance of the modeller's intervention. The recent advances in automatic optimisation techniques do not minimise the user's responsibility, who has to choose multiple criteria based on the aims of the study, his appreciation on the errors induced by data and model structure and his knowledge of the catchment's hydrology.
引用
收藏
页码:519 / 535
页数:17
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]   A soil moisture index as an auxiliary ANN input for stream flow forecasting [J].
Anctil, F ;
Michel, C ;
Perrin, C ;
Andréassian, V .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2004, 286 (1-4) :155-167
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2003, Water science and application, DOI [DOI 10.1029/WS006P0009, 10.1029/WS006]
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2005, MULTICRITERIA OPTIMI
[4]  
Bates B, 1990, NAT C HYDR ENG SAN D, P330
[5]  
Bergstrom S., 1995, Computer models of watershed hydrology., P443
[6]   PROPHECY, REALITY AND UNCERTAINTY IN DISTRIBUTED HYDROLOGICAL MODELING [J].
BEVEN, K .
ADVANCES IN WATER RESOURCES, 1993, 16 (01) :41-51
[7]   THE FUTURE OF DISTRIBUTED MODELS - MODEL CALIBRATION AND UNCERTAINTY PREDICTION [J].
BEVEN, K ;
BINLEY, A .
HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 1992, 6 (03) :279-298
[8]   Toward improved calibration of hydrologic models: Combining the strengths of manual and automatic methods [J].
Boyle, DP ;
Gupta, HV ;
Sorooshian, S .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2000, 36 (12) :3663-3674
[9]   On the estimation of antecedent wetness conditions in rainfall-runoff modelling [J].
Brocca, L. ;
Melone, F. ;
Moramarco, T. .
HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2008, 22 (05) :629-642
[10]   Comparison of infiltration models to simulate flood events at the field scale [J].
Chahinian, N ;
Moussa, R ;
Andrieux, P ;
Voltz, M .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2005, 306 (1-4) :191-214