Demographic gaps or preparation gaps?: The large impact of incoming preparation on performance of students in introductory physics

被引:70
作者
Salehi, Shima [1 ,2 ]
Burkholder, Eric [1 ]
Lepage, G. Peter [3 ]
Pollock, Steven [4 ]
Wieman, Carl [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Phys, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Grad Sch Educ, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[3] Cornell Univ, Lab Elementary Particle Phys, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
[4] Univ Colorado, Dept Phys, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
来源
PHYSICAL REVIEW PHYSICS EDUCATION RESEARCH | 2019年 / 15卷 / 02期
关键词
GENDER-DIFFERENCES; UNIVERSITY PHYSICS; AFRICAN-AMERICAN; ACHIEVEMENT; ENGAGEMENT; SCIENCE;
D O I
10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.15.020114
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
We have studied the impact of incoming preparation and demographic variables on student performance on the final exam in the standard introductory calculus-based mechanics course at three different institutions. Multivariable regression analysis was used to examine the extent to which exam scores can be predicted by a variety of variables that arc available to most faculty and departments. The results are surprisingly consistent across the institutions, with only math SAT or ACT scores and concept inventory prescores having predictive power. They explain 20%-30% of the variation in student exam performance in all three cases. In all cases, although there appear to be gaps in exam performance if one considers only demographic variables (gender, underrepresented minority, first generation), once these two proxies of incoming preparation are controlled for, there is no longer a demographic gap. There is only a preparation gap that applies equally across the entire student population. This work shows that to properly understand differences in student performance, it is important to do statistical analyses that take multiple variables into account, covering both subject-specific and general preparation. Course designs and teaching better matched to the incoming student preparation will likely eliminate performance gaps across demographic groups, while also improving the success of all students.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] Adams WK, 2005, AIP CONF PROC, V790, P45, DOI 10.1063/1.2084697
  • [2] LIKELIHOOD OF A MODEL AND INFORMATION CRITERIA
    AKAIKE, H
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 1981, 16 (01) : 3 - 14
  • [3] Enhancing Diversity in Undergraduate Science: Self-Efficacy Drives Performance Gains with Active Learning
    Ballen, Cissy J.
    Wieman, Carl
    Salehi, Shima
    Searle, Jeremy B.
    Zamudio, Kelly R.
    [J]. CBE-LIFE SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2017, 16 (04):
  • [4] Beichner R.J., 2007, Research-Based Reform of University Physics, V1, P2
  • [5] Toward equity through participation in Modeling Instruction in introductory university physics
    Brewe, Eric
    Sawtelle, Vashti
    Kramer, Laird H.
    O'Brien, George E.
    Rodriguez, Idaykis
    Pamela, Priscilla
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW SPECIAL TOPICS-PHYSICS EDUCATION RESEARCH, 2010, 6 (01):
  • [6] Peer Instruction: Ten years of experience and results
    Crouch, CH
    Mazur, E
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 2001, 69 (09) : 970 - 977
  • [7] Evaluating innovation in studio physics
    Cummings, K
    Marx, J
    Thornton, R
    Kuhl, D
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 1999, 67 (07) : S38 - S44
  • [8] Gender gaps and gendered action in a first-year physics laboratory
    Day, James
    Stang, Jared B.
    Holmes, N. G.
    Kumar, Dhaneesh
    Bonn, D. A.
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW PHYSICS EDUCATION RESEARCH, 2016, 12 (02):
  • [9] Beneath the numbers: A review of gender disparities in undergraduate education across science, technology, engineering, and math disciplines
    Eddy, Sarah L.
    Brownell, Sara E.
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW PHYSICS EDUCATION RESEARCH, 2016, 12 (02):
  • [10] Getting Under the Hood: How and for Whom Does Increasing Course Structure Work?
    Eddy, Sarah L.
    Hogan, Kelly A.
    [J]. CBE-LIFE SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2014, 13 (03): : 453 - 468