Socioeconomic Differences in the Uptake of Home Dialysis

被引:32
作者
Grace, Blair S. [1 ,2 ]
Clayton, Philip A. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Gray, Nicholas A. [1 ,5 ,6 ]
McDonald, Stephen P. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Royal Adelaide Hosp, Australia & New Zealand Dialysis & Transplant Reg, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
[2] Univ Adelaide, Fac Hlth Sci, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[3] Royal Prince Alfred Hosp, Dept Renal Med, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Univ Sydney, Sydney Med Sch, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[5] Nambour Gen Hosp, Dept Renal Med, Nambour, Qld, Australia
[6] Univ Queensland, Sunshine Coast Clin Sch, Nambour Gen Hosp, Nambour, Qld, Australia
来源
CLINICAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY | 2014年 / 9卷 / 05期
关键词
peritoneal dialysis; Epidemiology and outcomes; clinical epidemiology; PERITONEAL-DIALYSIS; MODALITY SELECTION; KIDNEY-DISEASE; ESRD PATIENTS; HEMODIALYSIS; AUSTRALIA; MORTALITY; OUTCOMES; REGISTRY; QUALITY;
D O I
10.2215/CJN.08770813
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background and objectivesHome dialysis creates fewer lifestyle disruptions while providing similar or better outcomes than in-center hemodialysis. Socioeconomically advantaged patients are more likely to commence home dialysis (peritoneal dialysis and home hemodialysis) in many developed countries. This study investigated associations between socioeconomic status and uptake of home dialysis in Australia, a country with universal access to health care and comparatively high rates of home dialysis.Design, setting, participants, & measurementsThis study analyzed 23,281 non-Indigenous adult patients who commenced chronic RRT in Australia from 2000 to 2011 according to the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry in a retrospective cohort study. This study investigated the proportion of patients who were ever likely to use home dialysis using nonmixture cure models and followed patients until the end of 2011 (median follow-up time=3.0 years, interquartile range=1.3-5.5 years). The main predictor was area socioeconomic status from postcodes grouped into quartiles using standard indices.ResultsPatients from the most advantaged quartile of areas were less likely to commence peritoneal dialysis (odds ratio, 0.63; 95% confidence interval, 0.58 to 0.69) and more likely to use in-center hemodialysis than patients from the most disadvantaged areas (odds ratio, 1.19; 95% confidence interval, 1.10 to 1.30). Socioeconomic status was not associated with uptake of home hemodialysis. Rural areas were more disadvantaged and had higher rates of peritoneal dialysis, and privately funded hospitals rarely used home dialysis. Patients from the most advantaged quartile of areas were more likely to use private hospitals than patients from the most disadvantaged quartile (odds ratio, 5.9; 95% confidence interval, 4.6 to 7.5).ConclusionThe lower incidence of peritoneal dialysis among patients from advantaged areas seems to be multifactorial. Identifying and addressing barriers to home dialysis in Australia could improve patient quality of life and reduce costs.
引用
收藏
页码:929 / 935
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Socioeconomic Factors and Racial and Ethnic Differences in the Initiation of Home Dialysis
    Shen, Jenny, I
    Chen, Lucia
    Vangala, Sitaram
    Leng, Lynn
    Shah, Anuja
    Saxena, Anjali B.
    Perl, Jeffrey
    Norris, Keith C.
    KIDNEY MEDICINE, 2020, 2 (02) : 105 - 115
  • [2] Home Sweet Home: A Program Report on Promoting the Uptake of Home Dialysis
    Churchill, Lucas James
    Reintjes, Frances
    Pauly, Robert
    Shah, Nikhil
    Thompson, Stephanie
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY HEALTH AND DISEASE, 2025, 12
  • [3] Staying home when peritoneal dialysis ends: the integrated home dialysis approach
    Pecce, Alex
    Belhumeur, Lea
    Nadeau-Fredette, Annie-Claire
    CURRENT OPINION IN NEPHROLOGY AND HYPERTENSION, 2025, 34 (01) : 104 - 111
  • [4] The use of virtual physician mentoring to enhance home dialysis knowledge and uptake
    Ashley, Justin
    Abra, Graham
    Schiller, Brigitte
    Bennett, Paul N.
    Mehr, Ali Poyan
    Bargman, Joanne M.
    Chan, Christopher T.
    NEPHROLOGY, 2021, 26 (07) : 569 - 577
  • [5] From Home Dialysis Access to Home Dialysis Quality
    Weinhandl, Eric D.
    Forfang, Derek
    ADVANCES IN CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE, 2022, 29 (01) : 52 - 58
  • [6] Dialysis Modality Education Timing and Home Dialysis Uptake: A Quality Improvement Study
    Lu, Declan
    Akhtar, Mishal
    Dubrofsky, Lisa
    Auguste, Bourne L.
    KIDNEY MEDICINE, 2024, 6 (11)
  • [7] Survival on Home Dialysis in New Zealand
    Marshall, Mark R.
    Walker, Rachael C.
    Polkinghorne, Kevan R.
    Lynn, Kelvin L.
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (05):
  • [8] The United States' Perspectives on Home Dialysis
    Qamar, Mohammad
    Bender, Filitsa
    Rault, Raymond
    Piraino, Beth
    ADVANCES IN CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE, 2009, 16 (03) : 189 - 197
  • [9] Racial Differences in Home Dialysis Utilization and Outcomes in Canada
    Trinh, Emilie
    Na, Yingbo
    Sood, Manish M.
    Chan, Christopher T.
    Perl, Jeffrey
    CLINICAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2017, 12 (11): : 1841 - 1851
  • [10] Centre variation in home dialysis uptake: A survey of kidney centre practice in relation to home dialysis organisation and delivery in England
    Damery, Sarah
    Lambie, Mark
    Williams, Iestyn
    Coyle, David
    Fotheringham, James
    Solis-Trapala, Ivonne
    Allen, Kerry
    Potts, Jessica
    Dikomitis, Lisa
    Davies, Simon J.
    PERITONEAL DIALYSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2024, 44 (04): : 265 - 274