A meta-analysis of the relationship between working memory and second language reading comprehension: Does task type matter?

被引:25
作者
Shin, Jihye [1 ]
机构
[1] No Arizona Univ, Flagstaff, AZ 86011 USA
关键词
meta-analysis; second language reading comprehension; working memory; INFERENTIAL COMPREHENSION; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; EFFECT SIZES; CAPACITY; KNOWLEDGE; ENGLISH; FAMILIARITY; MODERATORS; SKILLS;
D O I
10.1017/S0142716420000272
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
Despite the increasing attention paid to the role of working memory in reading, findings and measurement of working memory have been inconsistent. The current meta-analysis aims to provide a quantitative description of the overall relationship between second language (L2) reading comprehension and working memory measured through reading span task and identify methodological features that moderate this relationship. Following a comprehensive search, 25 primary studies (23 peer-reviewed studies and 2 dissertations) were included comprising 37 unique samples (N = 2,682), all of which were coded for substantive and methodological features. The results showed that (a) there is a moderate relationship between L2 reading comprehension and working memory (r = .30), (b) reading span task features such as the scoring procedure, task language, and final word recall order moderate this relationship, and (c) the degree to which working memory's involvement in L2 reading comprehension may vary depending on the type of reading tasks at hand. Implications are discussed in terms of conceptualization and measurement of working memory. Future directions are also offered in relation to measurement practices to encourage consistency and to improve our understanding of the link between working memory and L2 reading comprehension.
引用
收藏
页码:873 / 900
页数:28
相关论文
共 80 条
[1]  
Adams R., 2014, Applied Research on English Language, V3, P19
[2]   Effects of Variations in Reading Span Task Design on the Relationship Between Working Memory Capacity and Second Language Reading [J].
Alptekin, Cem ;
Ozemir, Oya ;
Ercetin, Gulcan .
MODERN LANGUAGE JOURNAL, 2014, 98 (02) :536-552
[3]   Effects of Working Memory Capacity and Content Familiarity on Literal and Inferential Comprehension in L2 Reading [J].
Alptekin, Cem ;
Ercetin, Gulcan .
TESOL QUARTERLY, 2011, 45 (02) :235-266
[4]   Assessing the relationship of working memory to L2 reading: Does the nature of comprehension process and reading span task make a difference? [J].
Alptekin, Cem ;
Ercetin, Gulcan .
SYSTEM, 2009, 37 (04) :627-639
[5]   The role of L1 and L2 working memory in literal and inferential comprehension in L2 reading [J].
Alptekin, Cem ;
Ercetin, Guelcan .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN READING, 2010, 33 (02) :206-219
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2001, PRACTICAL META ANAL
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Working Memory and Academic Learning: Assessment and Intervention
[8]   Working memory [J].
Baddeley, Alan .
CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2010, 20 (04) :R136-R140
[9]  
Baddeley A.D., 1990, HUMAN MEMORY THEORY
[10]  
Bailer C, 2011, THESIS