How do environmental regulations affect industrial dynamics? Evidence from China's pollution-intensive industries

被引:129
|
作者
Zhou, Yi [1 ,2 ]
Zhu, Shengjun [1 ]
He, Canfei [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Coll Urban & Environm Sci, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China
[2] Peking Univ, Lincoln Inst Ctr Urban Dev & Land Policy, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Environmental regulation; Pollution haven hypothesis; Porter hypothesis; Firm heterogeneity; Government intervention; ECONOMIC TRANSITION; FIRMS; ENFORCEMENT; HYPOTHESIS; STRATEGIES; MANAGEMENT; GEOGRAPHY; LOCATION; REFORMS; POLICY;
D O I
10.1016/j.habitatint.2016.12.002
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Pollution haven hypothesis (PHH) and porter hypothesis (PH) offer two different perspectives to understand the relationship between industrial dynamics and environmental regulations. This paper seeks to move beyond existing studies that are based on either the PHH or the PH while neglecting the other, towards an analytical framework that not only pays more attention to the ways in which the PHH and the PH co-exist, but also acknowledges the role of firm heterogeneity and local government intervention. Based on a firm-level industrial dataset and a dataset on China's polluting firms, this paper studies the relationship between environmental regulations and industrial dynamics in China's pollution-intensive industries at the firm level. Empirical results confirm the co-existence of the PH and the PHH. Furthermore, firm heterogeneity and government intervention both have the potential to inflect the relationship between environmental regulations and industrial dynamics. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:10 / 18
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] How do industrial land price and environmental regulations affect spatiotemporal variations of pollution-intensive industries? Regional analysis in China
    Hu, Jiameng
    Liang, Junhong
    Fang, Jian
    He, Huagui
    Chen, Fei
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 333
  • [2] The impact of environmental regulations on the location of pollution-intensive industries in China
    Shen, Jing
    Wei, Yehua Dennis
    Yang, Zi
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 148 : 785 - 794
  • [3] Stimulate or inhibit? Multiple environmental regulations and pollution-intensive Industries' Transfer in China
    Jiang, Zhujun
    Lyu, Pinjie
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 328
  • [4] Spatial Impact of Industrial Agglomeration and Environmental Regulation on Environmental Pollution—Evidence from Pollution-Intensive Industries in China
    Zheng-Xia He
    Chang-Shuai Cao
    Jian-Ming Wang
    Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy, 2022, 15 : 1525 - 1555
  • [5] Spatial Impact of Industrial Agglomeration and Environmental Regulation on Environmental Pollution-Evidence from Pollution-Intensive Industries in China
    He, Zheng-Xia
    Cao, Chang-Shuai
    Wang, Jian-Ming
    APPLIED SPATIAL ANALYSIS AND POLICY, 2022, 15 (04) : 1525 - 1555
  • [6] Going green or going away: Environmental regulation, economic geography and firms' strategies in China's pollution-intensive industries
    Zhu, Shengjun
    He, Canfei
    Liu, Ying
    GEOFORUM, 2014, 55 : 53 - 65
  • [7] Do Environmental Regulations Influence the Competitiveness of Pollution-Intensive Products?
    Lu, Yang
    FRONTIERS OF ECONOMICS IN CHINA, 2010, 5 (02) : 276 - 298
  • [8] Environmental Regulation for Transfer of Pollution-Intensive Industries: Evidence From Chinese Provinces
    Li, Weiqing
    Sun, Huaping
    Du, Yunsu
    Li, Ziyao
    Taghizadeh-Hesary, Farhad
    FRONTIERS IN ENERGY RESEARCH, 2020, 8
  • [9] The Impact of Heterogeneous Environmental Regulations on Location Choices of Pollution-Intensive Firms in China
    Tang, Chenghui
    Dou, Jianmin
    FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2021, 9
  • [10] How Promotion Incentives and Environmental Regulations Affect China's Environmental Pollution?
    Liu, Shiwen
    Zhang, Zhong
    Xu, Guangyao
    Zhang, Zhen
    Li, Hongyuan
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (05) : 1 - 20