Development and Validation of a National Data Registry for Midwife-Led Births: The Midwives Alliance of North America Statistics Project 2.0 Dataset

被引:33
作者
Cheyney, Melissa [1 ,2 ]
Bovbjerg, Marit [2 ,3 ]
Everson, Courtney [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Gordon, Wendy [5 ]
Hannibal, Darcy [6 ,7 ]
Vedam, Saraswathi [2 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Oregon State Univ, Dept Anthropol, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA
[2] MANA Div Res, Chicago, IL USA
[3] Oregon State Univ, Coll Publ Hlth & Human Sci, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA
[4] Midwives Coll Utah, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[5] Bastyr Univ Seattle, Dept Midwifery, Washington, DC USA
[6] Univ Calif Davis, Calif Natl Primate Res Ctr, Behav Management Program, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[7] Univ Calif Davis, McCowan Anim Behav Lab Welf & Conservat, Dept Populat Hlth, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[8] Univ British Columbia, Fac Med, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
关键词
birth center; cohort study; data collection; home childbirth; midwifery; parturition; registry; research design; NEONATAL-OUTCOMES; HOME BIRTHS;
D O I
10.1111/jmwh.12165
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
IntroductionIn 2004, the Midwives Alliance of North America's (MANA's) Division of Research developed a Web-based data collection system to gather information on the practices and outcomes associated with midwife-led births in the United States. This system, called the MANA Statistics Project (MANA Stats), grew out of a widely acknowledged need for more reliable data on outcomes by intended place of birth. This article describes the history and development of the MANA Stats birth registry and provides an analysis of the 2.0 dataset's content, strengths, and limitations. MethodsData collection and review procedures for the MANA Stats 2.0 dataset are described, along with methods for the assessment of data accuracy. We calculated descriptive statistics for client demographics and contributing midwife credentials, and assessed the quality of data by calculating point estimates, 95% confidence intervals, and kappa statistics for key outcomes on pre- and postreview samples of records. ResultsThe MANA Stats 2.0 dataset (2004-2009) contains 24,848 courses of care, 20,893 of which are for women who planned a home or birth center birth at the onset of labor. The majority of these records were planned home births (81%). Births were attended primarily by certified professional midwives (73%), and clients were largely white (92%), married (87%), and college-educated (49%). Data quality analyses of 9932 records revealed no differences between pre- and postreviewed samples for 7 key benchmarking variables (kappa, 0.98-1.00). DiscussionThe MANA Stats 2.0 data were accurately entered by participants; any errors in this dataset are likely random and not systematic. The primary limitation of the 2.0 dataset is that the sample was captured through voluntary participation; thus, it may not accurately reflect population-based outcomes. The dataset's primary strength is that it will allow for the examination of research questions on normal physiologic birth and midwife-led birth outcomes by intended place of birth.
引用
收藏
页码:8 / 16
页数:9
相关论文
共 44 条
[11]  
Berg C., 2001, STRATEGIES REDUCE PR
[12]   The Rising Cesarean Delivery Rate in America What Are the Consequences? [J].
Blanchette, Howard .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2011, 118 (03) :687-690
[13]  
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, ICD ICD 10 INT CLASS
[14]  
Cheyney M, 2011, 21 CENTURY MOTHERHOO, P27
[15]   Outcomes of Care for 16,924 Planned Home Births in the United States: The Midwives Alliance of North America Statistics Project, 2004 to 2009 [J].
Cheyney, Melissa ;
Bovbjerg, Marit ;
Everson, Courtney ;
Gordon, Wendy ;
Hannibal, Darcy ;
Vedam, Saraswathi .
JOURNAL OF MIDWIFERY & WOMENS HEALTH, 2014, 59 (01) :17-27
[16]   Improving midwifery practice: The American College of Nurse-Midwives' benchmarking project [J].
Collins-Fulea, C ;
Mohr, JJ ;
Tillett, J .
JOURNAL OF MIDWIFERY & WOMENS HEALTH, 2005, 50 (06) :461-471
[17]  
Davis-Floyd R, 2009, SCI ACROSS CULT, V5, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-90-481-2599-9_1
[18]   Listening to Mothers II: Report of the Second National US Survey of Women's Childbearing Experiences [J].
Declercq, Eugene R. ;
Sakala, Carol ;
Corry, Maureen P. ;
Applebaum, Sandra .
JOURNAL OF PERINATAL EDUCATION, 2007, 16 (04) :9-14
[19]   Previous cesarean section and the risk of postpartum maternal complications and adverse neonatal outcomes in future pregnancies [J].
Galyean, A. M. ;
Lagrew, D. C. ;
Bush, M. C. ;
Kurtzman, J. T. .
JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2009, 29 (11) :726-730
[20]  
Gliklich R E., Registries for Evaluating Patient Outcomes: A User's Guide, DOI [DOI 10.23970/AHRQEPCREGISTRIES4, 10.23970/ahrqepcregistries4]