The Relationship between Investor Materiality and the Sustainable Development Goals: A Methodological Framework

被引:51
作者
Betti, Gianni [1 ]
Consolandi, Costanza [2 ]
Eccles, Robert G. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Siena, Dept Econ & Stat, I-53100 Siena, Italy
[2] Univ Siena, Dept Business & Law, I-53100 Siena, Italy
[3] Univ Oxford, Said Business Sch, Oxford OX1 1HP, England
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
sustainability; Sustainable Development Goals; SDG; materiality; financial performance; impact; Sustainability Accounting Standard Board; SASB; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.3390/su10072248
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The world has great expectations for how the private sector, both companies and investors, can support the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). In fact, it is generally believed that these goals cannot be achieved without strong support from the private sector. But will making the world a better place hurt financial returns? The answer is "No" if companies focus on the SDGs and their associated targets that benefit from strong performance on the material environmental, social, and governance (ESG) issues that matter to investors. In this paper we map the 30 generic ESG issues identified by the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) to the SDGs and their targets. We show that some SASB issues are more material for a given SDG than others. We also show that some SASB issues are more important to the SDGs in general than others. We also map the material ESG issues for each of SASB's 79 industries to the SDGs and to their targets. For each sector, there are particular SDGs where it has high impact and for each SDG there are particular sectors that have a high impact on it, and some sectors are more important to the SDGs in aggregate than others. The same is true at the target level. This mapping can be used as a guide for both companies and investors who want to understand how value-creating ESG performance can contribute to the SDGs. This paper is divided into four parts. Part I explains the motivation for this study. Part II explains our methodology and Part III the results. Part IV concludes with a summary of our results and some reflections on how our mapping methodology can be improved.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Marital disruption and economic well-being: a comparative analysis [J].
Aassve, Arnstein ;
Betti, Gianni ;
Mazzuco, Stefano ;
Mencarini, Letizia .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-STATISTICS IN SOCIETY, 2007, 170 :781-799
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2015, BUSINESS UN WORKING
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1990, INCOME WEALTH DISTRI, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-84250-4_18
[4]   Employment measure in developing countries via minimum wage and poverty new fuzzy approach [J].
Besma B. .
OPSEARCH, 2015, 52 (2) :329-339
[5]   Fuzzy Multidimensional Indicators of Quality of Life: The Empirical Case of Macedonia [J].
Betti, Gianni ;
Soldi, Rossella ;
Talev, Ilija .
SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH, 2016, 127 (01) :39-53
[6]   Educational Mismatch of Graduates: a Multidimensional and Fuzzy Indicator [J].
Betti, Gianni ;
D'Agostino, Antonella ;
Neri, Laura .
SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH, 2011, 103 (03) :465-480
[7]   Stakeholder relations and stock returns: On errors in investors' expectations and learning [J].
Borgers, Arian ;
Derwall, Jeroen ;
Koedijk, Kees ;
ter Horst, Jenke .
JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL FINANCE, 2013, 22 :159-175
[8]  
Chakravorti B., 2017, CO CAN CHAMPION SUST
[9]  
Cheli B., 1995, EC NOTES SIENA, P115
[10]  
Eccles Robert, 2018, FORBES