Efficacy and tolerability of pharmacological interventions for pulmonary arterial hypertension: A network meta-analysis

Purpose: This network meta-analysis (NMA) is designed to compare the efficacy and tolerability of various therapies and combinations for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Method: We conducted a systematic search in databases PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library. Treatment efficacy and tolerability were compared by synthesizing direct and indirect evidence. The surface under the curve ranking area was utilized to rank multiple interventions. Result A total of 43 randomized clinical trials were included in our NMA. With regard to efficacy outcomes, including 6 min walking distance (6MWD), functional class amelioration (FCA), death, clinical worsening (CW), pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR), mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP), cardiac index (CI), and mean right atrial pressure (mRAP), endothelin receptor antagonists (ERA), phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor (PDE-51s), ERA combined with PDE-5Is (EAP), and prostacyclin analogs (PGI) combined with ERA (PAE) performed better than others. Meanwhile PAP and PGE demonstrated better than others in tolerability. Overall, EAP and PAE showed good efficacy and were well-tolerated among all therapies. Conclusion: Overall, we recommend EAP as the optimal choice for patients with PAH in clinical practice and PAE as suboptimal in view of their desirable performance in efficacy. Most of the combination therapies performed better than monotherapies.