Do Environmental Regulations Increase Bilateral Trade Flows?

被引:31
作者
Tsurumi, Tetsuya [1 ]
Managi, Shunsuke [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Hibiki, Akira [5 ]
机构
[1] Nanzan Univ, Fac Policy Studies, Seto, Aichi 4890863, Japan
[2] Kyushu Univ, Sch Engn, Dept Urban Engn, Nishi Ku, Fukuoka 8190395, Japan
[3] Kyushu Univ, Sch Engn, Dept Environm Engn, Nishi Ku, Fukuoka 8190395, Japan
[4] Queensland Univ Technol, Sch Business, Brisbane, Qld 4001, Australia
[5] Tohoku Univ, Grad Sch Econ & Management, Aoba Ku, Sendai, Miyagi 9808576, Japan
关键词
environmental regulations; Porter hypothesis; trade and environment; gravity model; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; IMPACT; GRAVITY; COMPETITIVENESS; PRODUCTIVITY; POLLUTION; EXCHANGE; PATTERNS; POLICIES;
D O I
10.1515/bejeap-2014-0164
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The argument that stringent environmental regulations are generally thought to harm export flows is crucial when determining policy recommendations related to environmental preservation and international competitiveness. By using bilateral trade data, we examine the relationships between trade flows and various environmental stringency indices. Previous studies have used energy intensity, abatement cost intensity, and survey indices for regulations as proxies for the strictness of environmental policy. However, they have overlooked the indirect effect of environmental regulations on trade flows. If the strong version of the Porter hypothesis is confirmed, we need to consider the effect of environmental regulation on gross domestic product (GDP), because GDP induced by environmental regulation affects trade flows. The present study clarifies the effects of regulation on trade flows by distinguishing between the indirect and direct effects. Our results indicate an observed non-negligible indirect effect of regulation, implying that the overall effect of appropriate regulation benefits trade flows.
引用
收藏
页码:1549 / 1577
页数:29
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Gravity with gravitas: A solution to the border puzzle [J].
Anderson, JE ;
van Wincoop, E .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2003, 93 (01) :170-192
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2006, NBER working papers
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2001, GLOBAL COMPETITIVENE
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2004, GLOBAL COMPETITIVENE
[5]  
[Anonymous], CHAIRS PAPER C PORTE
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2002, WORLD EC FORUM
[7]  
[Anonymous], ADV SPATIAL ECONOMET
[8]  
[Anonymous], DISCUSSION PAPER SER
[9]  
[Anonymous], FED RESERVE BANK ST
[10]  
Barro R.J., 2010, A new data set of educational attainment in the world, 1950-2010