Performance Comparison of Software Defined Networking Simulators for Tactical Network: Mininet vs. OPNET

被引:0
作者
Lee, Seungwoon [1 ]
Ali, Jehad [1 ]
Roh, Byeong-hee [1 ]
机构
[1] Ajou Univ, Dept Comp Engn, Suwon, South Korea
来源
2019 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTING, NETWORKING AND COMMUNICATIONS (ICNC) | 2019年
关键词
Software-Defined Networking; Modeling and Simulation; OPNET; Mininet; End-To-End Delay; Jitter; Tactical Network;
D O I
10.1109/iccnc.2019.8685572
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Software Defined Networking (SDN) has revolutionized the networking industry and also tactical communication due to its flexibility, innovation, and ease of programmability. However, modeling, evaluation, and testing of SDN based applications present several challenges. Mininet simulator has been developed for the study of SDN and used for SDN simulation in general. Although it is possible to prototype virtual SDN networks fast with Mininet, it is not for stress testing to validate the stability and reliability and simulation suitable for the real environment. The state-of-the-art network simulation tool OPNET recently OPNET has introduced the SDN Model, which can he used with a system in the loop (SITL). However, there is no research published yet which shows the use of OPNET for SDN. This paper rigorously compares the OPNET and Mininet for SDN experiments, we compare end-to-end delay, jitter, and RTT between controllers and switches. As a result, the Mininet environment cannot apply the network load, so it is desirable to use OPNET for simulation of the real environment or for the stability and reliability test.
引用
收藏
页码:197 / 202
页数:6
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] Anderson D., 2017, IEEE MILCOM 2017
  • [2] [Anonymous], THESIS
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2016, MILITARY COMMUNICATI
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2005, Iperf, the TCP/UDP Bandwidth Measurement Tool
  • [5] [Anonymous], THESIS
  • [6] A tool for the generation of realistic network workload for emerging networking scenarios
    Botta, Alessio
    Dainotti, Alberto
    Pescape, Antonio
    [J]. COMPUTER NETWORKS, 2012, 56 (15) : 3531 - 3547
  • [7] Du P., 2017, IEEE MILCOM 2017
  • [8] Fras M, 2011, INFORM MIDEM, V41, P27
  • [9] Gupta N, 2013, SPRINGERBRIEF MATER, P31, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-01243-8_5
  • [10] Henderson T., NETWORK SIMULATOR 3