Targeted Multiprobe Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Analysis for Elucidation of Inconclusive Pancreatobiliary Cytology

被引:15
|
作者
Vlajnic, Tatjana [1 ]
Somaini, Gina [1 ]
Savic, Spasenija [1 ]
Barascud, Audrey [1 ]
Grilli, Bruno [1 ]
Herzog, Michelle [1 ]
Obermann, Ellen C. [1 ]
Holmes, Brittany J. [2 ]
Ali, Syed Z. [2 ]
Degen, Lukas [3 ]
Bubendorf, Lukas [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Basel Hosp, Inst Pathol, CH-4031 Basel, Switzerland
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ Hosp, Dept Pathol, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
[3] Univ Basel Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, CH-4031 Basel, Switzerland
关键词
atypia; pancreatic cancer; cytology; fluorescence in situ hybridization; FISH; fine-needle aspiration; biliary tract; NEEDLE-ASPIRATION SAMPLES; DUCT BRUSHING CYTOLOGY; BILE-DUCT; K-RAS; CHRONIC-PANCREATITIS; ROUTINE CYTOLOGY; BILIARY; DIAGNOSIS; STRICTURES; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.1002/cncy.21429
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Endoscopic fine-needle aspiration (FNA) and brush cytology are standard methods for the diagnosis of pancreatobiliary malignancies. Although the majority of cytological diagnoses are straightforward, there remains a difficult category of inconclusive cytology. This study explored the utility of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) to improve the diagnostic stratification between reactive and malignant cells in cases of inconclusive cytology. METHODS: The multiprobe FISH assay UroVysion was used for copy number assessment of chromosomes 3, 7, 17, and the 9p21 locus on Papanicolaou-stained specimens with a diagnosis of inconclusive cytology (n=50), adenocarcinoma (n=31) and no evidence of malignancy (n=9). The target cells were photographed and their coordinates saved on an automated stage prior to hybridization. A positive test was defined as increased copy number (>2) of at least 2 chromosomes (3, 7, or 17) in at least 4 atypical cells, or loss of 9p21 in at least 12 cells. RESULTS: FISH confirmed all 31 cytological diagnoses of pancreatobiliary adenocarcinomas, and was negative in the 9 patients with negative cytology. Among the 50 cases with inconclusive cytology, FISH detected 19 of 31 cases with a final diagnosis of adenocarcinoma, and was negative in all 19 cases with no final evidence of malignancy (sensitivity of 61.3%, specificity of 100%, positive predictive value of 100%, negative predictive value of 61.3%). Loss of 9p21 was found in 43 (86%) of all 50 FISH-positive cases. CONCLUSIONS: Multiprobe FISH combined with automated relocation of atypical cells is a powerful technique to clarify inconclusive cytology of the pancreatobiliary tract, allowing for a better distinction between reactive atypia and malignancy. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol) 2014; 122: 627-34. (C) 2014 American Cancer Society.
引用
收藏
页码:627 / 634
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Predicting gefitinib responsiveness in lung cancer by fluorescence in situ hybridization/chromogenic in situ hybridization analysis of EGFR and HER2 in biopsy and cytology specimens
    Daniele, Lorenzo
    Macri, Luigia
    Schena, Marina
    Dongiovanni, Diego
    Bonello, Lisa
    Armando, Enrico
    Ciuffreda, Libero
    Bertetto, Oscar
    Bussolati, Gianni
    Sapino, Anna
    MOLECULAR CANCER THERAPEUTICS, 2007, 6 (04) : 1223 - 1229
  • [42] Analysis of ameloblastomas by comparative genomic hybridization and fluorescence in situ hybridization
    Toida, M
    Balázs, M
    Treszl, A
    Rákosy, Z
    Kato, K
    Yamazaki, Y
    Matsui, T
    Suwa, T
    Hatakeyama, D
    Makita, H
    Mori, S
    Yamashita, T
    Shibata, T
    Adány, R
    CANCER GENETICS AND CYTOGENETICS, 2005, 159 (02) : 99 - 104
  • [43] Comparison of Urine Cytology and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization in Upper Urothelial Tract Samples
    Reynolds, J. P.
    Voss, J. S.
    Kipp, B. R.
    Karnes, R. J.
    Nassar, A.
    Sebo, T. J.
    Clayton, A. C.
    Zhang, J.
    Henry, M. R.
    Halling, K. C.
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2011, 24 : 102A - 102A
  • [44] Evaluation of Urinary Diversion Specimens by Routine Cytology and Fluorescence In-Situ Hybridization
    Voss, Jesse
    Clayton, Amy
    Henry, Michael
    Zhang, Jun
    Karnes, R. Jeffery
    Hailing, Kevin
    CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2010, 118 (05) : 330 - 331
  • [45] Comparison of Urine Cytology and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization in Upper Urothelial Tract Samples
    Reynolds, Jordan P.
    Voss, Jesse S.
    Kipp, Benjamin R.
    Karnes, R. Jeffrey
    Nassar, Aziza
    Clayton, Amy C.
    Henry, Michael R.
    Sebo, Thomas J.
    Zhang, Jun
    Halling, Kevin C.
    CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2014, 122 (06) : 459 - 467
  • [46] A comparison of cytology and fluorescence in situ hybridization for the detection of lung cancer in bronchoscopic specimens
    Halling, Kevin C.
    Rickman, Otis B.
    Kipp, Benjamin R.
    Harwood, Aaron R.
    Doerr, Clinton H.
    Jett, James R.
    CHEST, 2006, 130 (03) : 694 - 701
  • [47] A comparison of fluorescence in situ hybridization and cytology for detecting lung cancer in bronchoscopic specimens
    Rickman, O
    Harwood, A
    Doerr, C
    Jett, J
    Halling, K
    LUNG CANCER, 2005, 49 : S161 - S161
  • [48] Comparison of Urine Cytology and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization in Upper Urothelial Tract Samples
    Reynolds, J. P.
    Voss, J. S.
    Kipp, B. R.
    Karnes, R. J.
    Nassar, A.
    Sebo, T. J.
    Clayton, A. C.
    Zhang, J.
    Henry, M. R.
    Halling, K. C.
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2011, 91 : 102A - 102A
  • [49] Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) as an adjunct technique to cytology in evaluating urine samples
    Veeramachaneni, R
    Nordberg, ML
    Martin, S
    Herrera, GA
    Turbat-Herrera, EA
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2002, 15 (01) : 186A - 186A
  • [50] Detection of urothelial carcinoma: Correlation between cytology and fluorescence in situ hybridization.
    Wolff, DJ
    Keane, T
    Felicissimo, C
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2003, 73 (05) : 226 - 226