Targeted Multiprobe Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Analysis for Elucidation of Inconclusive Pancreatobiliary Cytology

被引:15
|
作者
Vlajnic, Tatjana [1 ]
Somaini, Gina [1 ]
Savic, Spasenija [1 ]
Barascud, Audrey [1 ]
Grilli, Bruno [1 ]
Herzog, Michelle [1 ]
Obermann, Ellen C. [1 ]
Holmes, Brittany J. [2 ]
Ali, Syed Z. [2 ]
Degen, Lukas [3 ]
Bubendorf, Lukas [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Basel Hosp, Inst Pathol, CH-4031 Basel, Switzerland
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ Hosp, Dept Pathol, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
[3] Univ Basel Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, CH-4031 Basel, Switzerland
关键词
atypia; pancreatic cancer; cytology; fluorescence in situ hybridization; FISH; fine-needle aspiration; biliary tract; NEEDLE-ASPIRATION SAMPLES; DUCT BRUSHING CYTOLOGY; BILE-DUCT; K-RAS; CHRONIC-PANCREATITIS; ROUTINE CYTOLOGY; BILIARY; DIAGNOSIS; STRICTURES; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.1002/cncy.21429
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Endoscopic fine-needle aspiration (FNA) and brush cytology are standard methods for the diagnosis of pancreatobiliary malignancies. Although the majority of cytological diagnoses are straightforward, there remains a difficult category of inconclusive cytology. This study explored the utility of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) to improve the diagnostic stratification between reactive and malignant cells in cases of inconclusive cytology. METHODS: The multiprobe FISH assay UroVysion was used for copy number assessment of chromosomes 3, 7, 17, and the 9p21 locus on Papanicolaou-stained specimens with a diagnosis of inconclusive cytology (n=50), adenocarcinoma (n=31) and no evidence of malignancy (n=9). The target cells were photographed and their coordinates saved on an automated stage prior to hybridization. A positive test was defined as increased copy number (>2) of at least 2 chromosomes (3, 7, or 17) in at least 4 atypical cells, or loss of 9p21 in at least 12 cells. RESULTS: FISH confirmed all 31 cytological diagnoses of pancreatobiliary adenocarcinomas, and was negative in the 9 patients with negative cytology. Among the 50 cases with inconclusive cytology, FISH detected 19 of 31 cases with a final diagnosis of adenocarcinoma, and was negative in all 19 cases with no final evidence of malignancy (sensitivity of 61.3%, specificity of 100%, positive predictive value of 100%, negative predictive value of 61.3%). Loss of 9p21 was found in 43 (86%) of all 50 FISH-positive cases. CONCLUSIONS: Multiprobe FISH combined with automated relocation of atypical cells is a powerful technique to clarify inconclusive cytology of the pancreatobiliary tract, allowing for a better distinction between reactive atypia and malignancy. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol) 2014; 122: 627-34. (C) 2014 American Cancer Society.
引用
收藏
页码:627 / 634
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A comparison of cytology and fluorescence in situ hybridization for the detection of urothelial carcinoma
    Halling, KC
    King, W
    Sokolova, IA
    Meyer, RG
    Burkhardt, HM
    Halling, AC
    Cheville, JC
    Sebo, TJ
    Ramakumar, S
    Stewart, CS
    Pankratz, S
    O'Kane, DJ
    Seelig, SA
    Lieber, MM
    Jenkins, RB
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2000, 164 (05): : 1768 - 1775
  • [22] Evaluating the Significance of Pancreatobiliary Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Polysomy on Prognosis in De Novo Cholangiocarcinoma
    Ji, Hyun
    Fritcher, Emily Barr G.
    Yin, Jun
    Bainter, Tiffany M.
    Zemla, Tyler J.
    Gores, Gregory J.
    Halling, Kevin C.
    Kipp, Benjamin R.
    Roberts, Lewis R.
    CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2022, 13 (10) : e00523
  • [23] FLUORESCENCE IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION (FISH) FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF MALIGNANT PANCREATOBILIARY TRACT STRICTURES IN PATIENTS WITH JAUNDICE
    Sartori, M.
    Orsello, M.
    Montino, F.
    Ballare, M.
    Balzarini, M.
    Garello, E.
    Boldorini, R.
    Paganotti, A.
    Andorno, S.
    Del Piano, M.
    JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 2009, 50 : S108 - S108
  • [24] Diagnostic Utility of Multiprobe Fluorescence in situ Hybridization Assay for Detecting Cytogenetic Aberrations in Acute Leukemia
    Kim, Bo-Ram
    Choi, Jae-Lim
    Kim, Ji-Eun
    Woo, Kwang-Sook
    Kim, Kyeong-Hee
    Kim, Jeong-Man
    Kim, Sung-Hyun
    Han, Jin-Yeong
    ANNALS OF LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2014, 34 (03) : 198 - 202
  • [25] Elucidation of abnormal fertilization by single-cell analysis with fluorescence in situ hybridization and polymorphic marker analysis
    Malcov, Mira
    Frumkin, Tsvia
    Shwartz, Tamar
    Azem, Foad
    Amit, Ami
    Yaron, Yuval
    Ben-Yosef, Dalit
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2009, 91 (03) : 932.e3 - 932.e6
  • [26] Comparison of urinary cytology and fluorescence in situ hybridization in the detection of urothelial neoplasia: An analysis of discordant results
    McHale, Teresa
    Ohori, N. Paul
    Cieply, Kathy M.
    Sherer, Carol
    Bastacky, Sheldon I.
    DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2019, 47 (04) : 282 - 288
  • [27] Computerized Analysis of Cytology and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) in Induced Sputum for Lung Cancer Detection
    Guber, Alexander
    Greif, Joel
    Rona, Roni
    Fireman, Elizabeth
    Madi, Lea
    Kaplan, Tal
    Yemini, Zipi
    Gottfried, Maya
    Katz, Ruth L.
    Daniely, Michal
    CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2010, 118 (05) : 269 - 277
  • [28] Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Analysis of Pancreatoblastoma
    Wang, Chang-Liang
    Zhao, Wen-Hua
    Yu, Jinming
    Li, Sheng
    PANCREAS, 2009, 38 (02) : 223 - 224
  • [29] Use of interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization as a powerful diagnostic tool in cytology
    Jiang, F
    Katz, RL
    DIAGNOSTIC MOLECULAR PATHOLOGY, 2002, 11 (01) : 47 - 57
  • [30] Has Urine Cytology a Role to Play in the Era of Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization?
    Ajit, Dulhan
    Dighe, Swati
    Desai, Sangeeta
    ACTA CYTOLOGICA, 2010, 54 (06) : 1118 - 1122