Targeted Multiprobe Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Analysis for Elucidation of Inconclusive Pancreatobiliary Cytology

被引:15
|
作者
Vlajnic, Tatjana [1 ]
Somaini, Gina [1 ]
Savic, Spasenija [1 ]
Barascud, Audrey [1 ]
Grilli, Bruno [1 ]
Herzog, Michelle [1 ]
Obermann, Ellen C. [1 ]
Holmes, Brittany J. [2 ]
Ali, Syed Z. [2 ]
Degen, Lukas [3 ]
Bubendorf, Lukas [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Basel Hosp, Inst Pathol, CH-4031 Basel, Switzerland
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ Hosp, Dept Pathol, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
[3] Univ Basel Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, CH-4031 Basel, Switzerland
关键词
atypia; pancreatic cancer; cytology; fluorescence in situ hybridization; FISH; fine-needle aspiration; biliary tract; NEEDLE-ASPIRATION SAMPLES; DUCT BRUSHING CYTOLOGY; BILE-DUCT; K-RAS; CHRONIC-PANCREATITIS; ROUTINE CYTOLOGY; BILIARY; DIAGNOSIS; STRICTURES; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.1002/cncy.21429
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Endoscopic fine-needle aspiration (FNA) and brush cytology are standard methods for the diagnosis of pancreatobiliary malignancies. Although the majority of cytological diagnoses are straightforward, there remains a difficult category of inconclusive cytology. This study explored the utility of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) to improve the diagnostic stratification between reactive and malignant cells in cases of inconclusive cytology. METHODS: The multiprobe FISH assay UroVysion was used for copy number assessment of chromosomes 3, 7, 17, and the 9p21 locus on Papanicolaou-stained specimens with a diagnosis of inconclusive cytology (n=50), adenocarcinoma (n=31) and no evidence of malignancy (n=9). The target cells were photographed and their coordinates saved on an automated stage prior to hybridization. A positive test was defined as increased copy number (>2) of at least 2 chromosomes (3, 7, or 17) in at least 4 atypical cells, or loss of 9p21 in at least 12 cells. RESULTS: FISH confirmed all 31 cytological diagnoses of pancreatobiliary adenocarcinomas, and was negative in the 9 patients with negative cytology. Among the 50 cases with inconclusive cytology, FISH detected 19 of 31 cases with a final diagnosis of adenocarcinoma, and was negative in all 19 cases with no final evidence of malignancy (sensitivity of 61.3%, specificity of 100%, positive predictive value of 100%, negative predictive value of 61.3%). Loss of 9p21 was found in 43 (86%) of all 50 FISH-positive cases. CONCLUSIONS: Multiprobe FISH combined with automated relocation of atypical cells is a powerful technique to clarify inconclusive cytology of the pancreatobiliary tract, allowing for a better distinction between reactive atypia and malignancy. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol) 2014; 122: 627-34. (C) 2014 American Cancer Society.
引用
收藏
页码:627 / 634
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Multiprobe FISH for the elucidation of equivocal pancreatobiliary cytology
    Vlajnic, T.
    Somaini, G.
    Savic, S.
    Barascud, A.
    Degen, L.
    Obermann, E.
    Bubendorf, L.
    VIRCHOWS ARCHIV, 2013, 463 (02) : 132 - 132
  • [2] Routine brush cytology and fluorescence in situ hybridization for assessment of pancreatobiliary strictures
    Smoczynski, Marian
    Jablonska, Anna
    Matyskiel, Anita
    Lakomy, Joanna
    Dubowik, Michal
    Marek, Iwona
    Biernat, Wojciech
    Limon, Janusz
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2012, 75 (01) : 65 - 73
  • [3] The Role of Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization in Pancreatobiliary Brushing Cytology: A Large Retrospective Review with Histologic Correlation
    Khan, Jaffar
    De la Sancha, Carlo
    Saad, Mohammed
    Alkashash, Ahmad
    Ullah, Asad
    Alruwaii, Fatimah
    Zarate, Luis Velasquez
    Cramer, Harvey M.
    Wu, Howard H.
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2022, 12 (10)
  • [4] Reflex Ordering of Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) in Conjunction with Cytology in the Diagnosis of Pancreatobiliary Carcinoma: An Institutional Experience
    Cazzolli, Taryn
    Hackman, Sarah
    Nazarullah, Alia
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2023, 103 (03) : S283 - S284
  • [5] Improving the Accuracy of Pancreatobiliary Tract Cytology With Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization A Molecular Test With Proven Clinical Success
    Kipp, Benjamin R.
    Fritcher, Emily G. Barr
    Pettengill, Jennifer E.
    Halling, Kevin C.
    Clayton, Amy C.
    CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2013, 121 (11) : 610 - 619
  • [6] An Optimized Set of Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Probes for Detection of Pancreatobiliary Tract Cancer in Cytology Brush Samples
    Fritcher, Emily G. Barr
    Voss, Jesse S.
    Brankley, Shannon M.
    Campion, Michael B.
    Jenkins, Sarah M.
    Keeney, Matthew E.
    Henry, Michael R.
    Kerr, Sarah M.
    Chaiteerakij, Roongruedee
    Pestova, Ekaterina V.
    Clayton, Amy C.
    Zhang, Jun
    Roberts, Lewis R.
    Gores, Gregory J.
    Halling, Kevin C.
    Kipp, Benjamin R.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2015, 149 (07) : 1813 - +
  • [7] Phylogenetic analysis of multiprobe fluorescence in situ hybridization data from tumor cell populations
    Chowdhury, Salim Akhter
    Shackney, Stanley E.
    Heselmeyer-Haddad, Kerstin
    Ried, Thomas
    Schaeffer, Alejandro A.
    Schwartz, Russell
    BIOINFORMATICS, 2013, 29 (13) : 189 - 198
  • [8] Common Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Applications in Cytology
    Savic, Spasenija
    Bubendorf, Lukas
    ARCHIVES OF PATHOLOGY & LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2016, 140 (12) : 1323 - 1330
  • [9] Correlating routine cytology, quantitative nuclear morphometry by digital image analysis, and genetic alterations by fluorescence in situ hybridization to assess the sensitivity of cytology for detecting pancreatobiliary tract malignancy
    Fritcher, Emily G. Barr
    Kipp, Benjamin R.
    Slezak, Jeffrey M.
    Moreno-Luna, Laura E.
    Gores, Gregory J.
    Levy, Michael J.
    Roberts, Lewis R.
    Halling, Kevin C.
    Sebo, Thomas J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2007, 128 (02) : 272 - 279
  • [10] The Development of a Tailored Pancreatobiliary Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization (FISH) Assay to Improve Detection of Malignancy in Pancreatobiliary Brushings
    Fritcher, E. G. Barr
    Kipp, B. R.
    Voss, J. S.
    Brankley, S. M.
    Keeney, M. E.
    Campion, M. B.
    Pestova, E. V.
    Sokolova, I. A.
    Song, M.
    Roberts, L. R.
    Gores, G.
    Clayton, A. C.
    Halling, K. C.
    JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2013, 15 (06): : 909 - 909