Simultaneous hydrogen sulphide and carbon dioxide removal from biogas by water-swollen reverse osmosis membrane

被引:31
|
作者
Dolejs, Petr [1 ,2 ]
Postulka, Vaclav [1 ,2 ]
Sedlakova, Zuzana [1 ,3 ]
Jandova, Vera [1 ]
Vejrazka, Jiri [1 ]
Esposito, Elisa [3 ]
Jansen, Johannes Carolus [3 ]
Izak, Pavel [1 ]
机构
[1] ASCR, Inst Chem Proc Fundamentals, Vvi, Prague 16502 6, Suchdol, Czech Republic
[2] Prague Inst Chem Technol, Fac Environm Technol, CR-16628 Prague 6, Dejvice, Czech Republic
[3] ITM CNR, Inst Membrane Technol, I-87036 Arcavacata Di Rende, CS, Italy
关键词
Agro-biogas upgrading; Biomethane; Water vapour; SEM and EDX analysis; Porosimetry; Carbon dioxide; GAS SEPARATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.seppur.2014.04.041
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Biogas is a suitable alternative fuel if unwanted impurities are removed to avoid corrosion of the inner parts of an engine. A recent breakthrough in biogas purification showed that a thin hydrophilic composite membrane can create the selective water swollen barrier able to remove unwanted sour gases such as carbon dioxide and hydrogen sulphide owing to significantly higher water solubility of the latter in comparison to methane. This work presents the use of water-swollen membranes for the simultaneous removal of carbon dioxide, hydrogen sulphide and water vapour from agro-biogas. Up to 82 vol.% of carbon dioxide and 77 vol.% of hydrogen sulphide were successfully removed from the feed stream at a pressure of 220 kPa. The selection of the most suitable thin hydrophilic composite membrane based on the knowledge of its basic characteristics is discussed. SEM analysis showed that the surface of the best performing composites changed significantly upon swelling by water. It was found that a compact structure of the upper selective thin layer after the swelling by water is fundamental for obtaining a selective water-swollen membrane. The next key factor is a high porosity of the membrane support. A detailed comparison of various systems and their performance is presented. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:108 / 116
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Removal of nodularin from brackish water with reverse osmosis or vacuum distillation
    Vuori, E
    Pelander, A
    Himberg, K
    Waris, M
    Niinivaara, K
    WATER RESEARCH, 1997, 31 (11) : 2922 - 2924
  • [42] REMOVAL OF WATER FROM CLARIFIED CANE JUICE BY REVERSE-OSMOSIS
    CHANG, RLS
    MERLE, JP
    SUGAR Y AZUCAR, 1979, 74 (06): : 74 - 74
  • [43] Sequential electrolysis and reverse osmosis to improve arsenic removal from water
    Hou, Yizhi
    Mayer, Brooke K.
    AWWA WATER SCIENCE, 2022, 4 (04):
  • [44] Application of reverse osmosis technology for arsenic removal from drinking water
    Gholami, M. M.
    Mokhtari, M. A.
    Aameri, A.
    Fard, M. R. Alizadeh
    DESALINATION, 2006, 200 (1-3) : 725 - 727
  • [46] Synthesis of Bio-Cellulose Acetate Membrane From Coconut Juice Residues for Carbon Dioxide Removal From Biogas in Membrane Unit
    Khamwichit, Attaso
    Wattanasit, Sakkarin
    Dechapanya, Wipawee
    FRONTIERS IN ENERGY RESEARCH, 2021, 9
  • [47] Laboratory-Scale Investigation of Biogas Treatment by Removal of Hydrogen Sulfide and Carbon Dioxide
    Lasocki, Jakub
    Kolodziejczyk, Krzysztof
    Matuszewska, Anna
    POLISH JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES, 2015, 24 (03): : 1427 - 1434
  • [48] COD removal from industrial wastewater plants using reverse osmosis membrane
    Madaeni, S. S.
    Samieirad, S.
    MEMBRANE AND WATER TREATMENT, 2010, 1 (04): : 273 - 282
  • [49] Chemical-oxidative scrubbing for the removal of hydrogen sulphide from raw biogas: potentials and economics
    Miltner, M.
    Makaruk, A.
    Krischan, J.
    Harasek, M.
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 66 (06) : 1354 - 1360
  • [50] HYDROGEN SULPHIDE REMOVAL FROM BIOGAS STREAM BY GREEN SULPHUR BACTERIA UNDER LED ILLUMINATION
    De Luca, Elena
    Felici, Claudio
    Corsaro, Natale
    Rosa, Silvia
    Signorini, Antonella
    Izzo, Giulio
    PAPERS OF THE 22ND EUROPEAN BIOMASS CONFERENCE: SETTING THE COURSE FOR A BIOBASED ECONOMY, 2014, : 876 - 880