Finite Element Analysis of Two Different Implant Applicable for Vertical Bone Deficiency at Maxillary Sinus

被引:2
作者
Ataol, Mert [1 ]
Kilinc, Adnan [2 ]
Saruhan, Nesrin [3 ]
Gundogdu, Mustafa [4 ]
机构
[1] Mersin Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, TR-33340 Mersin, Turkey
[2] Ataturk Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, TR-25240 Erzurum, Turkey
[3] Osmangazi Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, TR-26040 Eskisehir, Turkey
[4] Ataturk Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Prosthodont, TR-25240 Erzurum, Turkey
关键词
Finite Element Analysis; Sinus Floor Elevation; Sinus Membrane Perforation; Sinus Grafting; Dental Implant; POSTERIOR MAXILLA; STRESS-DISTRIBUTION; DENTAL IMPLANTS; AUGMENTATION; STABILITY;
D O I
10.1166/jbt.2019.1978
中图分类号
Q813 [细胞工程];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: The critical point of the sinus floor elevation procedure is retaining the membrane intact. The BoneTrust Sinus (c) (BTS) implant system is recommended by the manufacturer as it could protect the membrane from perforation and provide greater primary stability. The aim of this study was to evaluate the stress distribution on the surrounding bone and implant body of this implant design compared with the conventional BoneTrust Plus (c) (BTP) design using three-dimensional (3D) finite element analyses (FEAs). Study Design: Six different finite element models, including two implant designs of three different graft qualities (high-stiff, medium-stiff and low-stiff), were prepared for the implant surgery on an atrophic edentulous maxilla with sinus pneumatization of a healthy individual. Then, these models were loaded with vertical and 30 degrees oblique forces. With 3D FEAs, stress distributions of these models were obtained, color-coded, and shown numerically. Results: According to the results of the study, oblique loading caused higher stress than vertical loading. The stresses were highest in the crestal cortical bone, lower in the graft, and lowest in the trabecular bone. In addition, BTS implant design had similar stress distribution values on the implant body, the surrounding bone, and the graft as did the conventional BTP design. Conclusions: The BTS implant design could be effective in stress distribution similarly to the conventional design and could even be preferable because of its clinical advantages. Additionally, these are obtained that supported cortical bone thickness, graft quality and angular parallelism between implants and occlusal forces are important factors in terms of load-bearing capacity.
引用
收藏
页码:315 / 321
页数:7
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Tilted and Short Implants Supporting Fixed Prosthesis in an Atrophic Maxilla: A 3D-FEA Biomechanical Evaluation [J].
Almeida, Erika O. ;
Rocha, Eduardo P. ;
Freitas Junior, Amilcar C. ;
Anchieta, Rodolfo B. ;
Poveda, Ronald ;
Gupta, Nikhil ;
Coelho, Paulo G. .
CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2015, 17 :E332-E342
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2018, J BIONANOSCI
[3]   Bone strains around apically free versus grafted implants in the posterior maxilla of human cadavers [J].
Cehreli, Murat Cavit ;
Akkocaoglu, Murat ;
Comert, Ayhan ;
Tekdemir, Ibrahim ;
Akca, Kivanc .
MEDICAL & BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING & COMPUTING, 2007, 45 (04) :395-402
[4]   Tilted versus axially placed dental implants: A meta-analysis [J].
Chrcanovic, Bruno Ramos ;
Albrektsson, Tomas ;
Wennerberg, Ann .
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2015, 43 (02) :149-170
[5]   Evaluation of the effect of an offset implant configuration in the posterior maxilla with external hexagon implant platform: A 3-dimensional finite element analysis [J].
de Souza Batista, Victor Eduardo ;
Verri, Fellippo Ramos ;
de Faria Almeida, Daniel Augusto ;
Santiago Junior, Joel Ferreira ;
Araujo Lemos, Cleidiel Aparecido ;
Pellizzer, Eduardo Piza .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2017, 118 (03) :363-371
[6]   Biomechanical effects of implant number and diameter on 0 stress distributions in maxillary implant-supported overdentures [J].
Dimililer, Gizem ;
Kucukkurt, Sercan ;
Cetiner, Sedat .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2018, 119 (02) :244-249
[7]  
Fanuscu Mete I, 2004, J Oral Implantol, V30, P59, DOI 10.1563/0.674.1
[8]  
Fugazzotto PA, 1999, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V14, P536
[9]   In Vitro Assessment of Primary Stability of BoneTrust Sinus Implant Design [J].
Gulses, Aydin ;
Ayna, Mustafa ;
Guclu, Hakan ;
Sencimen, Metin ;
Basiry, M. Nabi ;
Gierloff, Matthias ;
Acil, Yahya .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PERIODONTICS & RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2016, 36 (05) :731-735
[10]   Influence of implant number, length, and tilting degree on stress distribution in atrophic maxilla: a finite element study [J].
Gumrukcu, Zeynep ;
Korkmaz, Yavuz Tolga .
MEDICAL & BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING & COMPUTING, 2018, 56 (06) :979-989