Clinical equivalence of IV paracetamol compared to IV dipyrone for postoperative analgesia after surgery for breast cancer

被引:43
作者
Kampe, Sandra
Warm, Mathias
Landwehr, Susanne
Dagtekin, Oguzhan
Haussmann, Sascha
Paul, Matthias
Pilgram, Barbara
Kiencke, Peter
机构
[1] Univ Cologne, Dept Anaesthesiol, D-50931 Cologne, Germany
[2] Univ Cologne, Dept Gynaecol, D-50931 Cologne, Germany
[3] Inst Empir Hlth Ecom, Burscheid, Germany
关键词
analgesic efficacy; breast surgery; dipyrone; paracetamol; postoperative analgesia;
D O I
10.1185/030079906X132659
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To assess clinical efficacy of IV paracetamol 1 g and IV dipyrone 1 g on a 24-h dosing schedule in this randomised, double-blinded study of 40 ASA I-III ( American Society of Anesthesiologists classification of physical status) patients undergoing surgery for breast cancer. Research design and methods: General anaesthesia using remifentanil and propofol was performed for surgery. The patients were randomly allocated to two groups, receiving infusions of paracetamol 1 g/100 mL ( Para Group) or of dipyrone 1 g/100 mL ( Dipy Group) 30 min before arrival in the recovery area and every 6 h up to 24 h postoperatively. All patients had unrestricted access to opioid rescue medication via an IV patient-controlled analgesia ( PCA) device. Main outcome measures: The primary variables for clinical equivalence were the differences between the mean values for pain scores at rest and pain scores on coughing over 30 h postoperatively. The equivalence margin was determined as +/- 10 mm on the visual analogue scale ( VAS). Results: Regarding pain scores at rest, the 90% CI of the mean differences between the treatment groups over 30 h postoperatively was found to be within the predefined equivalence margin [+7.5/-6.2], and the CI values for pain scores on coughing [+7.3/-9.0] were similar. The two groups did not differ in cumulative opioid rescue consumption ( Dipy-Group 14.8 +/- 17.7 mg vs. Para Group 12.1 +/- 8.8 mg, p = 0.54) nor in piritramide loading dose ( Dipy Group 0.95 +/- 2.8 mg vs. Para Group 1.3 +/- 2.8 mg, p = 0.545). Five patients in the Dipy Group experienced hypotension in contrast to none in the Para Group ( p = 0.047). There were no significant between-treatment differences for other adverse events, patient satisfaction scores ( p = 0.4) or quality of recovery scores ( p = 0.3). Conclusion: IV paracetamol 1 g is clinically equivalent to IV dipyrone 1 g for postoperative analgesia after surgery for breast cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:1949 / 1954
页数:6
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   METAMIZOLE - REASSESSMENT OF ITS THERAPEUTIC ROLE [J].
ARELLANO, F ;
SACRISTAN, JA .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1990, 38 (06) :617-619
[2]   The effect of a single intravenous dose of metamizol 2 g, ketorolac 30 mg and propacetamol 1 g on haemodynamic parameters and postoperative pain after heart surgery [J].
Avellaneda, C ;
Gómez, A ;
Martos, F ;
Rubio, M ;
Sarmiento, J ;
de la Cuesta, FS .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2000, 17 (02) :85-90
[3]   Reliability of the visual analog scale for measurement of acute pain [J].
Bijur, PE ;
Silver, W ;
Gallagher, EJ .
ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2001, 8 (12) :1153-1157
[4]  
Camu F, 1992, Drugs, V44 Suppl 5, P42
[5]   ACTIVATION OF INHIBITION FROM THE PERIAQUEDUCTAL GRAY-MATTER MEDIATES CENTRAL ANALGESIC EFFECT OF METAMIZOL (DIPYRONE) [J].
CARLSSON, KH ;
HELMREICH, J ;
JURNA, I .
PAIN, 1986, 27 (03) :373-390
[6]  
Cruz P, 2002, Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim, V49, P391
[7]   THE MORPHINE-SPARING EFFECT OF PROPACETAMOL IN ORTHOPEDIC POSTOPERATIVE PAIN [J].
DELBOS, A ;
BOCCARD, E .
JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 1995, 10 (04) :279-286
[8]   The visual analog scale in the immediate postoperative period: Intrasubject variability and correlation with a numeric scale [J].
DeLoach, LJ ;
Higgins, MS ;
Caplan, AB ;
Stiff, JL .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1998, 86 (01) :102-106
[9]   TOLERANCE AND PHARMACOKINETICS OF PROPACETAMOL, A PARACETAMOL FORMULATION FOR INTRAVENOUS USE [J].
DEPRE, M ;
VANHECKEN, A ;
VERBESSELT, R ;
TJANDRAMAGA, TB ;
GERIN, M ;
DESCHEPPER, PJ .
FUNDAMENTAL & CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1992, 6 (06) :259-262
[10]  
Flouvat B, 2004, INT J CLIN PHARM TH, V42, P50