Prospective Comparative Study Between Proximal Femoral Nail vs. Screw Augmented Proximal Femoral Nail in Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures of Femur

被引:2
作者
Rajput, Ajay K. [1 ]
Gupta, Pradeep K. [1 ]
Gill, Simrat Pal S. [1 ]
Singh, Santosh Kumar [2 ]
Raj, Manish [3 ]
Singh, Jasveer [1 ]
Dubey, Pawan [1 ]
Sharma, Pranav [1 ]
机构
[1] Uttar Pradesh Univ Med Sci UPUMS, Dept Orthopaed, Etawah, India
[2] Employees State Insurance Corp ESIC Hosp, Dept Orthopaed & Traumatol, Kanpur, India
[3] All India Inst Med Sci, Dept Orthopaed, Deoghar, India
关键词
pfn; screw-augmented; proximal femoral nail; unstable; trochanteric fractures; lateral wall augmentation; intertrochanteric; INTRAMEDULLARY NAIL; HIP-FRACTURES; WALL; RISK;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.32791
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction The proximal femoral nail (PFN) is a widely accepted fixation method for the management of unstable intertrochanteric fractures. Reconstructing the lateral trochanteric wall and ensuring the stability of the trochanteric fragments are considered to be essential for enhancing the prognosis of unstable intertrochanteric fractures. The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the results of the management of unstable intertrochanteric fracture of the femur using PFN and the screw-augmented PFN (aPFN).Methods This prospective comparative study was undertaken from January 2020 to July 2021 and included 60 patients presenting with unstable intertrochanteric fractures (AO/OTA type 31-A2.2 and 31-A2.3) at a tertiary care teaching institute in northern India. The enrolled patients were randomly divided into two groups (group 1 and group 2) and were managed with screw-augmented PFN and PFN, respectively. Functional outcome was evaluated using the Salvati and Wilson score at the 12-month follow-up. SPSS version 24.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) was used for statistical analysis. A p-value less than 0.05 was regarded as significant.Results The average time to union of the fractures in group 1 was 12.66 +/- 1.68 weeks, while it was 13.47 +/- 1.47 weeks in group 2 (p = 0.055). At the 12-month follow-up, the average functional outcome, as evaluated by Salvati and Wilson score, was 34 +/- 2.40 in group 1, whereas it was 31.58 +/- 4.4 in group 2; and the difference was observed to be statistically significant (p = 0.011). Group 1 had 28 patients (93.33%) with excellent to good results, while group 2 had 25 patients (83.33%) with excellent to good results. One patient in group 1 and five patients in group 2 had poor outcomes at the 12-month follow-up.Conclusion Screw-augmented PFN has better functional outcomes as compared to PFN alone for the management of unstable intertrochanteric fractures. Hence, in our opinion, screw augmentation of PFN may be the better fixation technique for most unstable intertrochanteric femur fractures.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   A Comparison of the Clinicoradiological Outcomes of Intertrochanteric Fractures Treated Using Proximal Femoral Nail and Proximal Femoral Nail Anti-rotation [J].
Bhardwaj, Shubham ;
Sakale, Harshal ;
Agrawal, Alok C. ;
Kar, Bikram ;
Dash, Rudra Narayan ;
Rai, Alok ;
Garg, Ankit Kumar .
CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (05)
[22]   A Comparative Study of Screw and Helical Proximal Femoral Nails for the Treatment of Intertrochanteric Fractures [J].
Park, Jung Ho ;
Lee, Yong Seuk ;
Park, Jong Woong ;
Wang, Joon Ho ;
Kim, Jae Gyoon .
ORTHOPEDICS, 2010, 33 (02) :81-85
[23]   PROXIMAL FEMORAL NAIL IN THE MANAGEMENT OF INTERTROCHANTRIC FRACTURES: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY [J].
Maruthi, C. V. ;
Shivanna .
JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2015, 4 (75) :13063-13069
[24]   A comparative study of Proximal Femoral Nail (PFN) versus Dynamic Condylar Screw (DCS) in management of unstable trochanteric fractures [J].
Jamil, Md Faraz ;
Mohd, Julfiqar ;
Abbas, Mazhar ;
Siddiqui, Yasir Salam ;
Khan, Mohammad Jesan .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BURNS AND TRAUMA, 2022, 12 (03) :83-92
[25]   Biomechanical evaluation of a new intramedullary nail compared with proximal femoral nail antirotation and InterTAN for the management of femoral intertrochanteric fractures [J].
Wang, Chaofeng ;
Duan, Ning ;
Li, Zhong ;
Ma, Teng ;
Zhang, Kun ;
Wang, Qian ;
Huang, Qiang .
FRONTIERS IN BIOENGINEERING AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2024, 12
[26]   Biomechanical outcome of proximal femoral nail antirotation is superior to proximal femoral locking compression plate for reverse oblique intertrochanteric fractures: a biomechanical study of intertrochanteric fractures [J].
Ma, Jian-Xiong ;
Wang, Jie ;
Xu, Wei-Guo ;
Yu, Jing-Tao ;
Yang, Yang ;
Ma, Xin-Long .
ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA ET TRAUMATOLOGICA TURCICA, 2015, 49 (04) :426-432
[27]   Stabilisation of unstable trochanteric femoral fractures.: Dynamic hip screw (DHS) with trochanteric stabilisation plate vs. proximal femur nail (PFN) [J].
Nuber, S ;
Schönweiss, T ;
Rüter, A .
UNFALLCHIRURG, 2003, 106 (01) :39-47
[28]   INTERTAN nail versus proximal femoral nail antirotation-Asia for intertrochanteric femur fractures in elderly patients with primary osteoporosis [J].
Zhang, Hui ;
Zeng, Xianshang ;
Zhang, Nan ;
Zeng, Dan ;
Xu, Ping ;
Zhang, Lili ;
Chen, Deng ;
Yu, Weiguang ;
Zhang, Xinchao .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2017, 45 (04) :1297-1309
[29]   Proximal femoral nail for the treatment of reverse obliquity intertrochanteric fractures compared with gamma nail [J].
Min, Woo-Kie ;
Kim, Shin-Yoon ;
Kim, Tae-Kong ;
Lee, Kyu-Bong ;
Cho, Myung-Rae ;
Ha, Yong-Chan ;
Koo, Kyung-Hoi .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 2007, 63 (05) :1054-1060
[30]   Comparative biomechanical study of reversed less invasive stabilization system and proximal femoral nail antirotation for unstable intertrochanteric fractures [J].
Chen Ying ;
Liu Shouyao ;
Lin Peng ;
Wang Yunting ;
Wang Jinhui ;
Tao Jianfeng ;
Cai Rongrong .
CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2014, 127 (23) :4124-4129