Prospective Comparative Study Between Proximal Femoral Nail vs. Screw Augmented Proximal Femoral Nail in Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures of Femur

被引:0
|
作者
Rajput, Ajay K. [1 ]
Gupta, Pradeep K. [1 ]
Gill, Simrat Pal S. [1 ]
Singh, Santosh Kumar [2 ]
Raj, Manish [3 ]
Singh, Jasveer [1 ]
Dubey, Pawan [1 ]
Sharma, Pranav [1 ]
机构
[1] Uttar Pradesh Univ Med Sci UPUMS, Dept Orthopaed, Etawah, India
[2] Employees State Insurance Corp ESIC Hosp, Dept Orthopaed & Traumatol, Kanpur, India
[3] All India Inst Med Sci, Dept Orthopaed, Deoghar, India
关键词
pfn; screw-augmented; proximal femoral nail; unstable; trochanteric fractures; lateral wall augmentation; intertrochanteric; INTRAMEDULLARY NAIL; HIP-FRACTURES; WALL; RISK;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.32791
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction The proximal femoral nail (PFN) is a widely accepted fixation method for the management of unstable intertrochanteric fractures. Reconstructing the lateral trochanteric wall and ensuring the stability of the trochanteric fragments are considered to be essential for enhancing the prognosis of unstable intertrochanteric fractures. The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the results of the management of unstable intertrochanteric fracture of the femur using PFN and the screw-augmented PFN (aPFN).Methods This prospective comparative study was undertaken from January 2020 to July 2021 and included 60 patients presenting with unstable intertrochanteric fractures (AO/OTA type 31-A2.2 and 31-A2.3) at a tertiary care teaching institute in northern India. The enrolled patients were randomly divided into two groups (group 1 and group 2) and were managed with screw-augmented PFN and PFN, respectively. Functional outcome was evaluated using the Salvati and Wilson score at the 12-month follow-up. SPSS version 24.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) was used for statistical analysis. A p-value less than 0.05 was regarded as significant.Results The average time to union of the fractures in group 1 was 12.66 +/- 1.68 weeks, while it was 13.47 +/- 1.47 weeks in group 2 (p = 0.055). At the 12-month follow-up, the average functional outcome, as evaluated by Salvati and Wilson score, was 34 +/- 2.40 in group 1, whereas it was 31.58 +/- 4.4 in group 2; and the difference was observed to be statistically significant (p = 0.011). Group 1 had 28 patients (93.33%) with excellent to good results, while group 2 had 25 patients (83.33%) with excellent to good results. One patient in group 1 and five patients in group 2 had poor outcomes at the 12-month follow-up.Conclusion Screw-augmented PFN has better functional outcomes as compared to PFN alone for the management of unstable intertrochanteric fractures. Hence, in our opinion, screw augmentation of PFN may be the better fixation technique for most unstable intertrochanteric femur fractures.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparative efficacy of proximal femoral nail vs dynamic condylar screw in treating unstable intertrochanteric fractures
    Mohamed, Ahmed Mohamed Yousif
    Salih, Monzir
    Abdulgadir, Mohanad
    Abbas, Ayman E.
    Turjuman, Duha Lutfi
    WORLD JOURNAL OF ORTHOPEDICS, 2024, 15 (08): : 796 - 806
  • [2] Proximal Femoral Nail versus Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation: Functional and Radiological Outcome in Intertrochanteric Fractures of Femur
    Singh, Siddhartha
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 13 (10)
  • [3] Comparative Study of the Management of Intertrochanteric Fracture Femur With Proximal Femoral Nail vs. the Dynamic Hipscrew With Derotation Screw in Elderly Population
    Singh, Daljinder
    Singh, Akashdeep
    Singh, Gitesh
    Singh, Manjit
    Sandhu, Annie
    Sandhu, Kuldip S.
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 13 (11)
  • [4] TREATMENT OF UNSTABLE INTERTROCHANTERIC FRACTURE OF FEMUR WITH DYNAMIC HIP SCREW VERSUS PROXIMAL FEMORAL NAIL: A COMPARATIVE STUDY
    Chander, S. G.
    Kanagasarathy, K.
    Chander, Vijaysharathy
    Reddy, Narayana M.
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2015, 4 (59): : 10284 - 10293
  • [5] Proximal Femoral Nail vs. Dynamic Hip Screw in Treatment of Intertrochanteric Fractures: A Meta-Analysis
    Zhang, Kairui
    Zhang, Sheng
    Yang, Jun
    Dong, Weiqiang
    Wang, Shengnan
    Cheng, Yirong
    Al-Qwbani, Mohammed
    Wang, Qiang
    Yu, Bin
    MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR, 2014, 20 : 1628 - 1633
  • [6] OUTCOME ANALYSIS OF PROXIMAL FEMORAL NAIL IN STABLE INTERTROCHANTERIC FEMUR FRACTURES
    Tandon, Suneet
    Vijayvargiya, Mayank
    Pathak, Abhishek
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2015, 4 (15): : 2553 - 2560
  • [7] A STUDY ON COMPARISON OF RESULTS OF PROXIMAL FEMORAL NAIL AND DHS IN UNSTABLE PROXIMAL FEMORAL FRACTURES
    Bajpai, Himanshu
    Singh, Sanjeev Kumar
    Gupta, Pankaj
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2019, 8 (07): : 441 - 446
  • [8] EVALUATION OF CLINICAL AND RADIOLOGICAL OUTCOME OF INTERTROCHANTERIC FRACTURES OF FEMUR TREATED WITH PROXIMAL FEMORAL NAIL, A PROSPECTIVE STUDY
    Krishna, Radha A. M.
    Shivanand, S.
    Jha, Vivek
    Jayaram, B. S.
    Lokesh, M.
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2015, 4 (17): : 2922 - 2936
  • [9] Trochanteric gamma nail vs proximal femoral nail for pertrochanteric fractures: A comparative study
    Megas, P
    Kaisidis, A
    Zouboulis, P
    Papas, M
    Panagopoulos, A
    Lambiris, E
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR ORTHOPADIE UND IHRE GRENZGEBIETE, 2005, 143 (02): : 252 - 257
  • [10] Proximal femoral bionic nail (PFBN)-an innovative surgical method for unstable femoral intertrochanteric fractures
    Zhao, Haiyue
    Deng, Xiangtian
    Liu, Weijian
    Chen, Wei
    Wang, Lei
    Zhang, Yiran
    Wang, Zhongzheng
    Wang, Yuchuan
    Lian, Xiaodong
    Hou, Zhiyong
    Zhang, Qi
    Zhang, Yingze
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2023, 47 (04) : 1089 - 1099