Measuring Acute Poverty in the Developing World: Robustness and Scope of the Multidimensional Poverty Index

被引:487
作者
Alkire, Sabina [1 ]
Emma Santos, Maria [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Oxford Poverty & Human Dev Initiat, Oxford OX1 2JD, England
[2] Univ Nacl Sur, CONICET, RA-8000 Bahia Blanca, Buenos Aires, Argentina
关键词
poverty measurement; multidimensional poverty; capability approach; MDGs; basic needs; developing countries; MISSING WOMEN; DEPRIVATION; REDUCTION; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.01.026
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
This paper presents the Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI), a measure of acute poverty, understood as a person's inability to meet minimum international standards in indicators related to the Millennium Development Goals and to core functionings. It constitutes the first implementation of the direct method to measure poverty for over 100 developing countries. After presenting the MPI, we analyze its scope and robustness, with a focus on the data challenges and methodological issues involved in constructing and estimating it. A range of robustness tests indicate that the MPI offers a reliable framework that can complement global income poverty estimates. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:251 / 274
页数:24
相关论文
共 85 条
  • [1] Alkire S., 2010, 38 0PHI
  • [2] Alkire S., 2010, 22A OPHI RES PROGRES, V22a
  • [3] Alkire S., 2013, 60 OPHI
  • [4] Alkire S., MULTIDIMENS IN PRESS
  • [5] ALKIRE S., 2007, 7 OPHI
  • [6] Alkire S., 2011, 32A OPHI RES PROGRES, V32a
  • [7] Alkire S., 2013, OPHI RES BRIEFING
  • [8] Alkire S, 2012, GLOBAL CHILD POVERTY AND WELL-BEING: MEASUREMENT, CONCEPTS, POLICY AND ACTION, P103
  • [9] Where did identification go?
    Alkire, Sabina
    Foster, James
    Emma Santos, Maria
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC INEQUALITY, 2011, 9 (03) : 501 - 505
  • [10] Understandings and misunderstandings of multidimensional poverty measurement
    Alkire, Sabina
    Foster, James
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC INEQUALITY, 2011, 9 (02) : 289 - 314