Patient engagement in type 2 diabetes mellitus research: what patients want

被引:11
作者
Simacek, Kristina F. [1 ]
Nelson, Tanya [2 ]
Miller-Baldi, Mignon [3 ]
Bolge, Susan C. [2 ]
机构
[1] PatientsLikeMe, 160 2nd St, Cambridge, MA 02142 USA
[2] Janssen Sci Affairs LLC, Raritan, NJ USA
[3] Janssen Med Informat Ctr, Titusville, NJ USA
来源
PATIENT PREFERENCE AND ADHERENCE | 2018年 / 12卷
关键词
qualitative research; patient engagement; patient involvement; research priorities; diabetes mellitus; social networking; social media; RESEARCH PRIORITIES; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; POWERED RESEARCH; RESEARCH AGENDA; FOCUS GROUP; HEALTH; PERSPECTIVES; COMMUNITY; PEOPLE; CANCER;
D O I
10.2147/PPA.S159707
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: As patients are the ultimate stakeholder in their health, their perspectives should be included along with researchers, providers, and fenders of research design, execution, and interpretation. Despite the high prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), patients are rarely directly included in these decisions. Purpose: We sought to determine areas of research most important to patients with T2DM, identify ways through which patients with T2DM want to engage in research, and evaluate online patient research networks as a source for obtaining patient perspectives on research engagement. Patients and methods: This study used an online patient community forum (PatientsLikeMe) to host two asynchronous moderated discussions, each with three to four prompted discussion posts. A qualitative summary of themes was derived from the posts. Results: Eighty-eight participants with T2DM took part. Participants were mostly white (86%), averaged 58.6 years of age, half were female (50%), and over half (62%) resided in the US. Research priorities included managing T2DM with comorbidities, controlling blood sugar levels, finding a cure, and understanding causes of T2DM. Participants wanted to see direct applications of research to their lives. Clinical research was perceived to have overly restrictive eligibility criteria and to measure outcome sets that do not adequately address patient health concerns. Participants indicated broad interest in partnering in research and a willingness to apply their skills and educational background to specific stages in the research process. Conclusion: Patients with T2DM would like researchers to address outcomes that have meaning in patients' daily lives. Initiatives to involve patients in research should leverage and enable patients to contribute as participants, advisors, or co-investigators, going beyond research topic prioritization to full participation throughout the research process based on their abilities and interest. This study provides support for the use of online patient research network discussions to generate rich qualitative data to engage patients in research.
引用
收藏
页码:595 / 606
页数:12
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [11] Patients’, clinicians’ and the research communities’ priorities for treatment research: There is an important mismatch
    Crowe S.
    Fenton M.
    Hall M.
    Cowan K.
    Chalmers I.
    [J]. Research Involvement and Engagement, 1 (1)
  • [12] Patient-powered research networks: building capacity for conducting patient-centered clinical outcomes research
    Daugherty, Sarah E.
    Wahba, Santa
    Fleurence, Rachael
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2014, 21 (04) : 583 - 586
  • [13] The qualitative research interview
    DiCicco-Bloom, B
    Crabtree, BF
    [J]. MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2006, 40 (04) : 314 - 321
  • [14] Patient engagement in research: a systematic review
    Domecq, Juan Pablo
    Prutsky, Gabriela
    Elraiyah, Tarig
    Wang, Zhen
    Nabhan, Mohammed
    Shippee, Nathan
    Brito, Juan Pablo
    Boehmer, Kasey
    Hasan, Rim
    Firwana, Belal
    Erwin, Patricia
    Eton, David
    Sloan, Jeff
    Montori, Victor
    Asi, Noor
    Abu Dabrh, Abd Moain
    Murad, Mohammad Hassan
    [J]. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2014, 14
  • [15] Consumer involvement in setting the health services research agenda: persistent questions of value
    Entwistle, Vikki
    Calnan, Michael
    Dieppe, Paul
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH & POLICY, 2008, 13 : 76 - 81
  • [16] How The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute Is Engaging Patients And Others In Shaping Its Research Agenda
    Fleurence, Rachael
    Selby, Joe V.
    Odom-Walker, Kara
    Hunt, Gail
    Meltzer, David
    Slutsky, Jean R.
    Yancy, Clyde
    [J]. HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2013, 32 (02) : 393 - 400
  • [17] Patient-Powered Research Networks Aim To Improve Patient Care And Health Research
    Fleurence, Rachael L.
    Beal, Anne C.
    Sheridan, Susan E.
    Johnson, Lorraine B.
    Selby, Joe V.
    [J]. HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2014, 33 (07) : 1212 - 1219
  • [18] Launching PCORnet, a national patient-centered clinical research network
    Fleurence, Rachael L.
    Curtis, Lesley H.
    Califf, Robert M.
    Platt, Richard
    Selby, Joe V.
    Brown, Jeffrey S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2014, 21 (04) : 578 - 582
  • [19] Patient and Stakeholder Engagement in the PCORI Pilot Projects: Description and Lessons Learned
    Forsythe, Laura P.
    Ellis, Lauren E.
    Edmundson, Lauren
    Sabharwal, Raj
    Rein, Alison
    Konopka, Kristen
    Frank, Lori
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2016, 31 (01) : 13 - 21
  • [20] Patient and clinician views on comparative effectiveness research and engagement in research
    Forsythe, Laura P.
    Frank, Lori
    Walker, Kara Odom
    Anise, Ayodola
    Wegener, Natalie
    Weisman, Harlan
    Hunt, Gail
    Beal, Anne
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH, 2015, 4 (01) : 11 - 25