Patient engagement in type 2 diabetes mellitus research: what patients want

被引:11
作者
Simacek, Kristina F. [1 ]
Nelson, Tanya [2 ]
Miller-Baldi, Mignon [3 ]
Bolge, Susan C. [2 ]
机构
[1] PatientsLikeMe, 160 2nd St, Cambridge, MA 02142 USA
[2] Janssen Sci Affairs LLC, Raritan, NJ USA
[3] Janssen Med Informat Ctr, Titusville, NJ USA
来源
PATIENT PREFERENCE AND ADHERENCE | 2018年 / 12卷
关键词
qualitative research; patient engagement; patient involvement; research priorities; diabetes mellitus; social networking; social media; RESEARCH PRIORITIES; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; POWERED RESEARCH; RESEARCH AGENDA; FOCUS GROUP; HEALTH; PERSPECTIVES; COMMUNITY; PEOPLE; CANCER;
D O I
10.2147/PPA.S159707
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: As patients are the ultimate stakeholder in their health, their perspectives should be included along with researchers, providers, and fenders of research design, execution, and interpretation. Despite the high prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), patients are rarely directly included in these decisions. Purpose: We sought to determine areas of research most important to patients with T2DM, identify ways through which patients with T2DM want to engage in research, and evaluate online patient research networks as a source for obtaining patient perspectives on research engagement. Patients and methods: This study used an online patient community forum (PatientsLikeMe) to host two asynchronous moderated discussions, each with three to four prompted discussion posts. A qualitative summary of themes was derived from the posts. Results: Eighty-eight participants with T2DM took part. Participants were mostly white (86%), averaged 58.6 years of age, half were female (50%), and over half (62%) resided in the US. Research priorities included managing T2DM with comorbidities, controlling blood sugar levels, finding a cure, and understanding causes of T2DM. Participants wanted to see direct applications of research to their lives. Clinical research was perceived to have overly restrictive eligibility criteria and to measure outcome sets that do not adequately address patient health concerns. Participants indicated broad interest in partnering in research and a willingness to apply their skills and educational background to specific stages in the research process. Conclusion: Patients with T2DM would like researchers to address outcomes that have meaning in patients' daily lives. Initiatives to involve patients in research should leverage and enable patients to contribute as participants, advisors, or co-investigators, going beyond research topic prioritization to full participation throughout the research process based on their abilities and interest. This study provides support for the use of online patient research network discussions to generate rich qualitative data to engage patients in research.
引用
收藏
页码:595 / 606
页数:12
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], RES INVOLV ENGAGEM
  • [2] [Anonymous], PATIENT PREFERENCE A, DOI DOI 10.2147/PPA.S104259
  • [3] Spectrum of Diabetes Research does not Reflect Patients' Scientific Preferences: A Longitudinal Evaluation of Diabetes Research Areas 2010-2013 vs. a Cross-sectional Survey in Patients with Diabetes
    Arnolds, S.
    Heckermann, S.
    Heise, T.
    Sawicki, P. T.
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & DIABETES, 2015, 123 (05) : 299 - 302
  • [4] Accessing support and empowerment online: The experiences of individuals with diabetes
    Brady, Ellen
    Segar, Julia
    Sanders, Caroline
    [J]. HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2017, 20 (05) : 1088 - 1095
  • [5] Brown K, 2006, BRIT J GEN PRACT, V56, P206
  • [6] Health behavior changes after colon cancer: A comparison of findings from face-to-face and on-line focus groups
    Campbell, MK
    Meier, A
    Carr, C
    Enga, Z
    James, AS
    Reedy, J
    Zheng, B
    [J]. FAMILY & COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2001, 24 (03) : 88 - 103
  • [7] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2014, NAT DIAB STAT REP ES
  • [8] The rise of people power
    Chafe, Roger
    Born, Karen B.
    Slutsky, Arthur S.
    Laupacis, Andreas
    [J]. NATURE, 2011, 472 (7344) : 410 - 411
  • [9] How to increase value and reduce waste when research priorities are set
    Chalmers, Iain
    Bracken, Michael B.
    Djulbegovic, Ben
    Garattini, Silvio
    Grant, Jonathan
    Guelmezoglu, A. Metin
    Howells, David W.
    Ioannidis, John P. A.
    Oliver, Sandy
    [J]. LANCET, 2014, 383 (9912) : 156 - 165
  • [10] The worldwide epidemiology of type 2 diabetes mellitus-present and future perspectives
    Chen, Lei
    Magliano, Dianna J.
    Zimmet, Paul Z.
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2012, 8 (04) : 228 - 236