Psychometric Evaluation of the Chinese Version of the Patient Perceptions of Empowerment Scale (PPES)

被引:19
作者
Yeh, Mei-Yu [1 ]
Lin, Sieh-Hwa [2 ]
Tung, Tao-Hsin [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Chang Gung Univ Sci & Technol, Grad Inst Hlth Care, Taoyuan 33303, Taiwan
[2] Natl Taiwan Normal Univ, Dept Educ Psychol & Counseling, Taipei 10610, Taiwan
[3] Fu Jen Catholic Univ, Sch Med, Dept Publ Hlth, Taipei 24205, Taiwan
[4] Cheng Hsin Gen Hosp, Dept Med Res & Educ, Taipei 11220, Taiwan
关键词
CULTURAL-ADAPTATION; HEALTH-CARE; RELIABILITY; VALIDITY;
D O I
10.1155/2014/867451
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Objectives. To evaluate the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Patient Perceptions of Empowerment Scale (PPES) and to perform a cross-cultural validity assessment. Methods. In this cross-sectional survey, 554 inpatients in three general hospitals in northern Taiwan were recruited. Principal component analysis was used to examine the factor structure of the scale. Confirmatory factor analyses were conducted on the measurement model of the Chinese version of the PPES. Results. Confirmatory factor analyses supported the presence of a second-order four-factor model (information, decision, individual, and self-management) of the Chinese version of the PPES when used with a Taiwanese inpatient population. The results indicate that the 11-item, second-order, four-factor Chinese version of the PPES provided best goodness-of-fit for the data in this study. Conclusion. The 11-item four-factor Chinese version of the PPES is a self-completion scale. This study demonstrated that the Chinese version of the PPES is a reliable and valid self-report instrument for the assessment of patient perceptions of empowerment in clinical practice. Further adaptation and evaluation of the scale will hopefully stimulate further studies on PPES in the fields of psychometrics in Taiwan.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE - A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED 2-STEP APPROACH [J].
ANDERSON, JC ;
GERBING, DW .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1988, 103 (03) :411-423
[2]  
Anderson R, 2000, NAT HIST, V109, P23
[3]   The diabetes empowerment scale-short form (DES-SF) [J].
Anderson, RM ;
Fitzgerald, JT ;
Gruppen, LD ;
Funnell, MM ;
Oh, MS .
DIABETES CARE, 2003, 26 (05) :1641-1642
[4]   Patient empowerment: Myths and misconceptions [J].
Anderson, Robert M. ;
Funnell, Martha M. .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2010, 79 (03) :277-282
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1989, STRUCTURAL EQUATION
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1998, Using LISREL for structural equation modeling: A researcher's guide
[7]  
Bagozzi R. P., 1988, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, V16, P74, DOI [DOI 10.1007/BF02723327, 10.1007/bf02723327]
[8]   Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures [J].
Beaton, DE ;
Bombardier, C ;
Guillemin, F ;
Ferraz, MB .
SPINE, 2000, 25 (24) :3186-3191
[9]  
Browne M.W., 1993, SOCIOL METHOD RES, P445
[10]   The psychometrics of developing the patient empowerment scale [J].
Bulsara, Caroline ;
Styles, Irene ;
Ward, Alison M. ;
Bulsara, Max .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOCIAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 24 (02) :1-16