Selection bias and the Big Four premium: new evidence using Heckman and matching models

被引:62
作者
Clatworthy, Mark A. [1 ]
Makepeace, Gerald H. [1 ]
Peel, Michael J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Cardiff Univ, Cardiff Business Sch, Cardiff CF10 3EU, S Glam, Wales
关键词
audit fees; Big Four premium; matching estimators; propensity score matching; selection bias; two-step models; SAMPLE SELECTION; AUDIT FEES; LITIGATION RISK; QUALITY; FIRMS; CHOICE;
D O I
10.1080/00014788.2009.9663354
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Many prior studies have found that large auditors charge significantly higher fees for statutory audit services, potentially resulting from higher audit quality and/or a lack of competition in the audit market. However, recent research using a Heckman two-step procedure attributes the large auditor premium to auditor selection bias. In this paper we examine the limitations of the Heckman model and estimate the large auditor (Big Four) premium using decomposition and matching methods on a large sample of UK private companies. Our analysis suggests that Heckman two-step estimates are highly sensitive to changes in sample and model specification, particularly the presence of a valid identifying variable. In contrast, the propensity score and portfolio matching methods we employ point to a persistent large auditor premium, consistent with the majority of previous studies. Conclusions of the premium vanishing when selection bias is controlled for therefore appear premature. Since the Heckman model is increasingly used in auditing and other areas of accounting research, our discussion and findings are likely to be of more general interest.
引用
收藏
页码:139 / 166
页数:28
相关论文
共 59 条
[2]   How robust is the evidence on the effects of college quality? Evidence from matching [J].
Black, DA ;
Smith, JA .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 2004, 121 (1-2) :99-124
[3]   WAGE DISCRIMINATION - REDUCED FORM AND STRUCTURAL ESTIMATES [J].
BLINDER, AS .
JOURNAL OF HUMAN RESOURCES, 1973, 8 (04) :436-455
[4]   An analysis of cross-sectional differences in big and non-big public accounting firms' audit programs [J].
Blokdijk, Hans ;
Drieenhuizen, Fred ;
Simunic, Dan A. ;
Stein, Michael T. .
AUDITING-A JOURNAL OF PRACTICE & THEORY, 2006, 25 (01) :27-48
[5]  
Bryson A., 2002, The use of propensity score matching in the evaluation of active labor market policies
[6]  
Chan P., 1993, J BUSINESS FINANCE A, V20, P765
[7]  
Chaney P.K., 2005, Self-selection of auditors and size nonlinearities in audit pricing
[8]   Self-selection of auditors and audit pricing in private firms [J].
Chaney, PK ;
Jeter, DC ;
Shivakumar, L .
ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2004, 79 (01) :51-72
[9]   The effect of corporate status on external audit fees: Evidence from the UK [J].
Clatworthy, Mark A. ;
Peel, Michael J. .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS FINANCE & ACCOUNTING, 2007, 34 (1-2) :169-201
[10]  
Collis J., 2004, ACCOUNTING BUSINESS, V34, P87, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2004.9729955, DOI 10.1080/00014788.2004.9729955]