Evidence-based patient information about treatment of multiple sclerosis- : A phase one study on comprehension and emotional responses

被引:50
作者
Kasper, Juergen
Koepke, Sascha
Muehlhauser, Ingrid
Heesen, Christoph
机构
[1] Univ Hamburg, Unit Hlth Sci & Educ, D-20146 Hamburg, Germany
[2] Univ Hamburg Hosp, Dept Neurol, Eppendorf, Germany
关键词
patient education; evidence-based medicine; multiple sclerosis; uncertainty; decision; decision making;
D O I
10.1016/j.pec.2005.06.002
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective: This study analysis the comprehension and emotional responses of people suffering from multiple sclerosis when provided with an evidence-based information module. It is a core module of a comprehensive decision aid about immunotherapy. The core module is designed to enable patients to process scientific uncertainty without adverse effects. It considers existing standards for risk communication and presentation of data. Methods: Using a mailing approach we investigated 169 patients with differing courses of disease in a before-after design. Items addressed the competence in processing relative and absolute risk information and patients' emotional response to the tool, comprising grade of familiarity with the information, understanding, relevance, emotional arousal, and certainty. Results: Overall, numeracy improved (p < 0.001), although 99 of 169 patients did not complete the numeracy task correctly. Understanding depended on the relevance related to the course of disease. A moderate level of uncertainty was induced. No adverse emotional responses could be shown, neither in those who did comprehend the information, nor in those who did not develop numeracy skills. Conclusion: In conclusion, the tool supports people suffering from multiple sclerosis to process evidence-based medical information and scientific uncertainty without burdening them emotionally. Practice implications: This study is an example for the documentation of an important step in the development process of a complex intervention. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:56 / 63
页数:8
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   PREDICTION OF GOAL-DIRECTED BEHAVIOR - ATTITUDES, INTENTIONS, AND PERCEIVED BEHAVIORAL-CONTROL [J].
AJZEN, I ;
MADDEN, TJ .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 22 (05) :453-474
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2003, COCHRANE DB SYST REV
[3]  
[Anonymous], GESUNDHEITSPSYCHOLOG
[4]  
[Anonymous], Decisional Conflict Scale
[5]   Understanding why decision aids work: linking process with outcome [J].
Bekker, HL ;
Hewison, J ;
Thornton, JG .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2003, 50 (03) :323-329
[6]   Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health [J].
Campbell, M ;
Fitzpatrick, R ;
Haines, A ;
Kinmonth, AL ;
Sandercock, P ;
Spiegelhalter, D ;
Tyrer, P .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 321 (7262) :694-696
[7]   Sharing decisions with patients: Is the information good enough? [J].
Coulter, A ;
Entwistle, V ;
Gilbert, D .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1999, 318 (7179) :318-322
[8]  
Degner L F, 1997, Can J Nurs Res, V29, P21
[9]   Writing wrongs? An analysis of published discourses about the use of patient information leaflets [J].
Dixon-Woods, M .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2001, 52 (09) :1417-1432
[10]   Explaining risks: turning numerical data into meaningful pictures [J].
Edwards, A ;
Elwyn, G ;
Mulley, A .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2002, 324 (7341) :827-830